Case law

Hall v. Callaway

94 Ark. 49 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 21, 1910

The act of March 23, 1909, gives to the city council the right to fill all vacancies on such boards. … Board of Directors, etc. v. Moreland, post p. 380. In Morrilton Waterworks Improvement District v.

Colquitt v. Stevens

111 Ark. 314 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 9, 1914

This holding is not in conflict with any ruling made in the cases of Ahern v. Board of Improvement, 69 Ark. 68 ; Earl v. Board of Improvement. 70 Ark. 211 , and Board of Improvement v. Offenhauser, 84 Ark. 257 . … Rector v. Board, 50 Ark. 116 .

Kennard v. Fudge

219 Ark. 157 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jun 18, 1951

Two cases involving that Statute are: Primrose v. Brown, 173 Ark. 632 , 292 S. W. 1003 , and Wilkerson v. White, 182 Ark. 1014 , 33 S. W. 2d 365 . In Primrose v. … premises would get through the unrepaired portion of the-division fence . . . ” In Wilkerson v.

Green v. Carder

276 Ark. 591 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jul 19, 1982

Williams v. Westinghouse, supra, citing Sharpp v. Stodghill, supra. … Jones Co. v.

Newboles v. State

214 Ark. 240 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Dec 6, 1948

Brown v. State, 208 Ark. 180 , 185 S. W. 2d 274 . These two young women appeared before the jury and were vigorously cross-examined. … See Long v. State, 76 Ark. 493 , 89 S. W. 93 , 91 S. W. 26 ; Lomax v. State, 165 Ark. 386 , 264 S. W. 823 ; George v. State, 148 Ark. 638 , 231 S. W. 9 . IV.

Commercial Energy Users Group v. Arkansas Public Service Commission

369 Ark. 13 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 15, 2007

AWG cites Brown v. Arkansas Public Service Commission, 17 Ark. … See Campbell v.

Capps v. Judsonia & Steprock Road Improvement District

154 Ark. 46 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jun 5, 1922

Boyd v. Bryant, 35 Ark. 69 ; Nall v. Kelly, 120 Ark. 277 .” We also quoted from the Supreme Court of Ohio in the case of Cincinnati, etc., Rd. Co. v. … Bennett v. Johnson, 130 Ark. 507 -514; Tarvin v. Road Imp. Dist. 137 Ark. 354 -364; Sallee v. Dalton, 138 Ark. 549 -553; Booe v. Simms, 139 Ark. 595 -602-3; Van Dyke v. Mack, 139 Ark. 524 ; Easley v.

City of Little Rock v. Smith

204 Ark. 692 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jul 13, 1942

In Williams v. State, 85 Ark. 464 , 108 S. W. 838 , 26 L. R. A., N. S. 482, 122 Am. St. … These rules have been upheld by this court in Allen v. Ingalls, 182 Ark. 991 , 33 S. W. 2d 1099 , and State v. Martin & Lipe, 134 Ark. 420 , 204 S. W. 622 .

Perry v. Gill

184 Ark. 1099 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jan 11, 1932

The discretion to form snch new districts is vested in the several boards of education. Bledsoe v. McKeowan, 181 Ark. 584 , 26 S. W. (2d) 900 . … it appears that such order is arbitrary or unreasonable as held in Bledsoe v.

Browning v. Browning

319 Ark. 205 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jan 9, 1995

Brown, Justice. This appeal concerns a suit for negligence brought by appellant Sheridan Browning against his brother, appellee Dwain Browning. … Young v. Paxton, supra; Cox v. McLaughlin, 315 Ark. 338 , 867 S.W.2d 460 (1993).

State Highway Commission v. Saline County

205 Ark. 860 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · May 17, 1943

County Board of Education, 177 Ark. 734 , 7 S. … To the same effect is the decision in the case of Faulkner County Board of Education v. Common School District No. 103, 183 Ark. 846 , 39 S.

Pifer v. Single Source Transportation

347 Ark. 851 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Mar 7, 2002

Edens v. Superior Marble & Glass, 346 Ark. 487 , 58 S.W.3d 369 (2001); Lawhon Farm Servs. v. Brown, 335 Ark. 272 , 984 S.W.2d 1 (1998). … Lawhon Farm Servs. v. Brown, supra; Sawyer v. State, 327 Ark. 421 , 938 S.W.2d 843 (1997). Although aware of our interpretation of the term “employment services” in White v.

Milsap v. Holland

186 Ark. 895 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jan 20, 1933

W. (2d) 631 ; Shook v. Morrison, Ib. 522, 47 S. W. (2d) 1089 , and Ellis v. Gann, Ib. 625, 48 S. … The opinion in Milsap v.

Shipley Baking Company v. Hartford

182 Ark. 503 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 27, 1930

city board of health of the city in which the bakery was located, and manufactured and shipped its products under the supervision of such State and city boards of health. … As applying this principle according to the facts of the particular case, we cite the following: Carpenter v. Little Rock, 101 Ark. 238 , 142 S. W. 162 ; State v. Haynes, 175 Ark. 645 , 300 S. W. 380 ; Duncan v.

Lavaca School District No. 3 v. Charleston School District No. 9

304 Ark. 104 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Dec 10, 1990

Again, in Carter Special District v. … In Magnolia School District No. 14 v.

City of Little Rock v. Evans

213 Ark. 522 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · May 24, 1948

Upon the authority of the case of City of Little Rock v. Joyner, 212 Ark. 508 , 206 S. W. 2d 446 , and the even more recent case of City of Little Rock v. Griffin, ante, p. 465, 210 S. … Dowsey v. Village of Kensington, 257 N. Y. 221 , 177 N. E. 427 , 86 A. L. R. 642.

Morris v. State

333 Ark. 466 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jun 4, 1998

Abdullah v. State, 302 Ark. 506 , 790 S.W.2d 440 (1990). … In a similar case, the Superior Court of New Jersey concluded that a parole board’s miscalculation of a prisoner’s parole-eligibility date could be corrected at any time. New Jersey State Parole Board v.

Canal Ins. Co. v. First Nat. Bank of Fort Smith

268 Ark. 356 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Apr 14, 1980

Canal Insurance Co. v. First National Bank, 266 Ark. 1044 , 596 S.W. 2d 710 (Ark. App. 1979). … on behalf of the Board was in order.

Flippo v. Mode O'Day Frock Shops of Hollywood

248 Ark. 1 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 9, 1970

See, inter alia, Kapp v. Sullivan Chevrolet Company, 234 Ark. 395 , 353 S. W. 2d 5 ; Ford Motor Company v. Fish, 232 Ark. 270 , 335 S. W. 2d 713 . In one case, Chapman Chemical Company v. … See Delta Oxygen Company v. Scott, 238 Ark. 534 , 383 S. W. 2d 885 (1964).

Carroll v. Saunders

38 Ark. 216 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 15, 1881

Gantt’s Digest, sec. 4694; Garribaldi v. Carroll, 33 Ark., 568. Unless made so by bill of exceptions, a motion for a new trial is no part of the record. White v. Prigmore, 28 Ark., 450; Nisbett v. … Brown & Norton, 30 Ark., 585; Farquharson v. Johnson, 35 Ark., 536. The record presents no question for our determination. Affirmed.