Case law

Poe v. Case

263 Ark. 488 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · May 22, 1978

See Browning v. Tarwater, 215 Kan. 501 , 524 P. 2d 1135 (1974); Spencer v. Franks, supra; Matter of Fox, 567 P. 2d 985 (Okla., 1977); 2 Am. Jur. 2d 929, Adoption, § 85. … See Browning v. Tarwater, supra; Matter of Fox, supra. Besides, the new adoption statute is the most recent declaration of public policy with reference to adoptions. In Ark. Stat.

G.A.C. Trans-World Acceptance Corp. v. Jaynes Enterprises, Inc.

255 Ark. 752 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Dec 17, 1973

In Board of Equalization v. … GEORGE ROSE SMITH and BROWN, JJ., join in this opinion. NOTES [1] Our holdings in such cases as Smith v. Howard, 23 Ark. 203 , and Mandel v.

Shelton Ex Rel. Piccirilli v. Fiser

340 Ark. 89 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jan 20, 2000

Brown, Justice. This appeal involves the application of the statute of limitations to a medical malpractice action brought by a parent on behalf of a minor child. … See, e.g., Board of Trustees v. Stodola, 328 Ark. 194 , 942 S.W.2d 255 (1997); Donoho v Donoho, 318 Ark. 637 , 887 S.W.2d 290 (1994); Conway Corp. v Construction Eng’rs, Inc., 300 Ark. 225 , 782 S.W.2d 36 (1989).

Gardner v. Goss

147 Ark. 178 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jan 24, 1921

Counsel for appellant cité the case of Thompson v. Gibbs, 37 S. … This question was thoroughly considered by this court in the recent cases of McClendon v. State, 129 Ark. 286 ; Faucette v. Gerlach, 132 Ark. 58 ; Inland Construction Co. v. Rector, 133 Ark. 277 .

Releford v. Pine Bluff School District No. 3

355 Ark. 503 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jan 8, 2004

This court first considered this Act in the case of Small v. … of this opinion, the trial court appears to have relied on the case of McGough v.

Felton Oil Co., L.L.C. v. Gee

357 Ark. 421 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · May 20, 2004

Brown, Justice. Appellants Felton Oil Co., stice. … V.

Arkansas Game and Fish Commission and Jeff Crow, as Director of the Arkansas Game and Fish Commission v. Greg Heslep and Keith Heslep

2019 Ark. 226 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jun 20, 2019

Accordingly, I must dissent for the reasons stated in my dissent in Board of Trustees of University of Arkansas v. Andrews, 2018 Ark. 12, 535 S.W.3d 616, and its progeny. … McMullan& Brown, by: Marian M. McMullan and Amy Clemmons Brown, for appellees. 15 16

Hall v. Callaway

94 Ark. 49 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 21, 1910

The act of March 23, 1909, gives to the city council the right to fill all vacancies on such boards. … Board of Directors, etc. v. Moreland, post p. 380. In Morrilton Waterworks Improvement District v.

Moore v. Horsley

42 Ark. 163 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 15, 1883

Zachery v. Brown, 17 Ark., 442. Reversed and remanded, with directions to abate the action as premature.

Trimble v. State

316 Ark. 161 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 28, 1994

Brown v. State, 309 Ark. 503 , 832 S.W.2d 477 (1992); Black v. State, 306 Ark. 394 , 814 S.W.2d 905 (1991). … See United States v. Brown, 801 F.2d 352 (8th Cir. 1986). Here, that person is Young. Yet, the prosecutor also advised the circuit judge that he would not use the Young evidence against Trimble.

Milsap v. Holland

184 Ark. 996 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Dec 21, 1931

Bledsoe v. McKeowen, 181 Ark. 584 , 26 S. W. (2d) 900 . … No. 21 v. Common School Dist. No. 87, 35 S. W. (2d) 587 ; and Nathan Special School Dist. No. 4 v. Bullock Springs Special Sch. Dist. No. 36, 183 Ark. 706 , 38 S. W. (2d) 19 .

McDonald v. Bryant

238 Ark. 338 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Sep 14, 1964

POWERS, DUTIES, FUNCTIONS AND AUTHORITY OF THE BOARD; APPOINTING THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE AS THE ATTORNEY FOR THE BOARD; AUTHORIZING THE APPROPRIATION OF FUNDS FOR EXPENSES AND■OPERATION OF THE BOARD; PROVIDING … , powers, duties, functions and authority of the board appointing the attorney general . of the state as the attorney for the board; authorizing the appropriation of funds for expenses and operation of the board; providing

Commonwealth Farm Loan Co. v. Lester

179 Ark. 293 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Apr 1, 1929

A carbon copy of the certificate was kept on file by the superintendent of the board, and what was called the original was, filed by him in the office of the county clerk. … Davies v. Pettit, 11 Ark. 349 ; Brasch v. Western Tie & Timber Co., 80 Ark. 425 , 97 S. W. 445 ; and Woodruff v. State, 61 Ark. 157 , 32 S. W. 102 .

Crossett Lumber Company v. McCain, Comm. of Labor

205 Ark. 631 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Apr 5, 1943

Ry. v. Cooper, 111 Ark. 91 , 163 S. W. 160 ; Ark. Land & Lbr. Co. v. Secrist, 118 Ark. 561 , 177 S. W. 37 ; Harger v. Harger, 144 Ark. 375 , 222 S. W. 736 ; Harkins v. National Handle Co., 159 Ark. 15 , 250 S. W. 900 .” … Co. v. Phillips.

McClellan, Mayor v. Stuckey

196 Ark. 816 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 10, 1938

The case of Bush v. Echols, 178 Ark. 507 , 10 S. W. 2d 906 , is contrary to appellants’ contentions. … We said in Bush v.

Skokos v. Gray

318 Ark. 571 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 7, 1994

We varied from it in Brown v. … We repeated the quoted language in Shorey v. Thompson, 295 Ark. 664 , 750 S.W.2d 955 (1988). In neither the Brown case nor the Shorey case did we grant the writ.

Griffen v. ARK. JUD. DISC. AND DIS. COM'N

247 S.W.3d 816 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jan 25, 2007

BROWN, Justice. … Lynch v.

Earl v. Malone

80 Ark. 218 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 8, 1906

Bourland v. McKnight, 79 Ark. 427 . … Jones v. Eubanks, 86 Ga. 616 ; Trimble v. Durham, 70 Miss. 295 ; Brown v. Brown, 109 N. C. 124 . The testimony is not as full or satisfactory as it might be concerning the necessity for furnishing the supplies.

Heiskell v. H. C. Enterprise, Inc.

244 Ark. 857 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · May 13, 1968

It seems inescapable to me that the only inference to be drawn from the statement is that the Library Board agreed not to contend that acceptance of final payment waived any breach by the Library Board, as it might have contended … I am authorized to state that BrowN, J., joins in this dissent.

Graham v. State

296 Ark. 400 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 3, 1988

The appellant, as he appeared at the hearing, had brown hair. … At the trial some three days later, the witness said the person he saw at the crime scene had hair that was “blondish brown, brown, dark.” 260 Ark. at 760 , 543 S.W.2d at 936 .