Case law

Saxon v. Purma

256 Ark. 461 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Apr 29, 1974

The writ was placed in the hands of Sheriff Saxon and he levied the execution on a number of mobile homes belonging to the defendant, Brown Enterprises. … We agree with the appellant that the rule of law announced in Lowrey v. Yates, 212 Ark. 399 , 206 S.W. 2d 1 , applies to the facts in the case at fc?ar.

City of Newport v. Owens

213 Ark. 513 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · May 17, 1948

W. 577 ; Barnwell v. Gravette, 87 Ark. 430 , 112 S. W. 973 ; Batesville v. Ball, 100 Ark. 496 , 140 S. W. 712 , Ann. Cas. 1913C, 1317; Fowler v. Ratterree, 110 Ark. 8 , 160 S. W. 893 ; Brown v. … Some of the cases so holding are Brown v. Peach Orchard, supra, and Pine Bluff v. Mead, supra.

Kinco, Inc. v. Schueck Steel, Inc.

283 Ark. 72 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jun 25, 1984

Brown and Byron Freeland, Little Rock, for appellant. Owens, McHaney & Calhoun by John C. Calhoun, Jr., Little Rock, for appellee. DUDLEY, Justice. … Walt Bennett Ford, Inc. v. Pulaski County Special School Dist, 274 Ark. 208 , 624 S.W.2d 426 (1981); Mason v. Funderbunk, 247 Ark. 521 , 446 S.W.2d 543 (1969).

Thomas v. Street Improvement District No. 296

158 Ark. 187 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Apr 9, 1923

Counsel for appellant rely upon the decision of this court in Kirst v. … Such is tiie effect of our decision in Ingram v.

Missouri Pac. R.R., Thompson, Trustee v. Hill

200 Ark. 253 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Apr 1, 1940

Co. v. Barham, 198 Ark. 158 , 128 S. W. 2d 353 , an action to recover damages for personal injuries growing out of an accident at Wild Cat Crossing, north of Prescott, on November 14, 1937. … At the second jail (one was the city jail and the other the county jail), he says he was whipped and beaten again by Brown-low and another man.

Muse v. Prescott School Dist.

233 Ark. 789 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 3, 1961

State Board of Education, 195 Ark. 222 , 112 S. W. 2d 18 , this Court said: “In Davis v. … See Arkansas Highway Commission v.

Files v. Hill

268 Ark. 106 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 25, 1980

Arnold sought to have the actions of the Boards of Election Commissioners of the State of Arkansas and of Pulaski . … The Board of Election Commissioners has no power to call or hold a new election and for the court to direct it to do so would be to confer a power that does not exist. See McFarlin v. Kelly, supra; McCoy v.

Kildow v. Baldwin Piano & Organ

333 Ark. 335 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · May 21, 1998

With a pair of pliers in her right hand, she would grab and twist wires around a post, pull one end of the wires through a hole in the board, flip the board over, twist and secure the wires to the back of the board, and send … the board down the line.

Hempstead County v. Grave

44 Ark. 317 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 15, 1884

Phillips County v. Lee County, 34 Ark., 240; Pulaski County v. County Judge, 37 Ib., 339. Thus, the ease of Monroe County v. … It was the plain duty of the board of supervi-■ sors, and of its successor, the county court of Howard, to act upon the statement furnished by Hempstead.

Evans v. McKinley

234 Ark. 472 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jan 15, 1962

In Pugsley v. Sellmeyer, 158 Ark. 247 , 250 S. W. 538 , 30 A. L. … In Johnson v. Robbins, 223 Ark. 150 , 264 S.

Tucker v. Wilamouicz

3 Ark. 157 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jul 15, 1847

The first case, in which the negative of the proposition was held, was Watson v. Shelly, 1 J. … The reason given by Lord MaNSFIeld in favor of the rule of Watson v. Shelly, will-not apply in the case before the court, to exclude Brown and Fenno as incompetent.

Price v. State

313 Ark. 96 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · May 3, 1993

Brown, Justice. … Herron v. Jones, 276 Ark. 493 , 637 S.W.2d 569 (1982); see also First American Carriers, Inc. v. The Kroger Co., 302 Ark. 86 , 787 S.W.2d 669 (1990); Gipson v. Brown, 288 Ark. 422 , 706 S.W.2d 369 (1986).

DeHart v. State

312 Ark. 323 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Mar 22, 1993

Jones v. State, supra; Toney v. State, 294 Ark. 473 , 743 S.W.2d 816 (1987); Lambert v. State, 286 Ark. 408 , 692 S.W.2d 238 (1985). … Prior to the revocation hearing on November 4,1991, a hearing was held before the parole board and a summary and finding of the parole board was filed on September 9, 1991.

Poe v. Case

263 Ark. 488 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · May 22, 1978

See Browning v. Tarwater, 215 Kan. 501 , 524 P. 2d 1135 (1974); Spencer v. Franks, supra; Matter of Fox, 567 P. 2d 985 (Okla., 1977); 2 Am. Jur. 2d 929, Adoption, § 85. … See Browning v. Tarwater, supra; Matter of Fox, supra. Besides, the new adoption statute is the most recent declaration of public policy with reference to adoptions. In Ark. Stat.

Maddox v. City of Fort Smith

346 Ark. 209 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 11, 2001

a manner inconsistent with a resolution passed by the Board in 1994. … Schueck Steel, Inc. v.

Easley v. Patterson

142 Ark. 52 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 2, 1920

This is illustrated by the decision of this court in the case of Pulaski Gas Light Co. v. … The latest case on this subject is Bush v. Road Improvement District of Lee County, ms. op. And another illustrative case is that of Hill v. Echols, 140 Ark. 474 .

McDonald v. Bryant

238 Ark. 338 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Sep 14, 1964

POWERS, DUTIES, FUNCTIONS AND AUTHORITY OF THE BOARD; APPOINTING THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE AS THE ATTORNEY FOR THE BOARD; AUTHORIZING THE APPROPRIATION OF FUNDS FOR EXPENSES AND■OPERATION OF THE BOARD; PROVIDING … , powers, duties, functions and authority of the board appointing the attorney general . of the state as the attorney for the board; authorizing the appropriation of funds for expenses and operation of the board; providing

Milsap v. Holland

184 Ark. 996 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Dec 21, 1931

Bledsoe v. McKeowen, 181 Ark. 584 , 26 S. W. (2d) 900 . … No. 21 v. Common School Dist. No. 87, 35 S. W. (2d) 587 ; and Nathan Special School Dist. No. 4 v. Bullock Springs Special Sch. Dist. No. 36, 183 Ark. 706 , 38 S. W. (2d) 19 .

Ark. Power & Light Co. v. McGowan, Admr.

227 Ark. 55 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Dec 10, 1956

Adams v. Barron G. … Dierks Lumber & Coal Company v. Brown, 8 Cir., 19 F. 2d 732 ; Arkansas Light & Power Company v. Cullen, 167 Ark. 379 , 268 S. W. 12 ; Arkansas General Utilities Company v. Shipman, 188 Ark. 580 , 67 S. W. 2d 178 .”

Hutto v. Rogers

191 Ark. 787 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 18, 1935

court of Faulkner County on November 14, 1934, to review their several actions resulting in a failure to place on the several ballots to be used in the general 'election on November 6, 1934, the ballot title furnished said board … Hester v. Bourland, 80 Ark. 145 , 95 S. W. 992 ; Gladish v. Lovewell, 95 Ark. 618 , 130 S. W. 579 ; Davis v. Wilson, 183 Ark. 271 , 35 S. W. (2d) 1020 .