Case law

Dare v. Frost

540 S.W.3d 281 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Mar 8, 2018

Brown v. Brown , 2012 Ark. 89 , 387 S.W.3d 159 . We also give special deference to the circuit court's superior position in evaluating the witnesses, their testimony, and the child's best interest. Id. … See Brown , 2012 Ark. 89 , 387 S.W.3d 159 .

Linker-Flores v. Arkansas Department of Human Services

356 Ark. 369 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Mar 4, 2004

. § 9-27-316 (h)(1) (Supp. 2003); see also Brown v. Arkansas Dep’t of Human Servs., 330 Ark. 497 , 954 S.W.2d 270 (1997). Because Appellant is entitled to representation on appeal, we deny Smith’s motion to be relieved. … Further, we order the parties to this matter to brief the issue of whether counsel representing a parent in a termination proceeding should be required to file a no-merit brief, comparable to that required under Anders v.

Black Bros. Lumber Co. v. Varner

164 Ark. 103 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Apr 28, 1924

Co. v. … In Millsaps v.

St. Louis Union Trust Co. v. Smith

207 Ark. 815 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 30, 1944

Brown died in 1934 and his widow, Janie Brown, in the same year, married Fred Merrell, and she and Fred Merrell thereafter lived on the land until about March 9, 1937. … In the case of Kirby v. Boaz, 103 Tex. 525 , 131 S.

Giss v. Apple

239 Ark. 1124 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Dec 13, 1965

The vote taken Oct. 26, 1964, validily authorized the Board to make the exchange. III. Under the articles of incorporation and bylaws the Board has authority independently to enter into the proposed exchange. IV. … The above sections give the Corporation the above powers but do not confer this power expressly on the governing Board of such Corporations. In the case of Rives v. McGaughey, 210 Ark. 658 , 197 S.

Sherman v. State

308 S.W.3d 614 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · May 14, 2009

State v. Brown, 356 Ark. 460 , 156 S.W.3d 722 (2004). … In such cases, the heightened protection of privacy against unlawful intrusion into a citizen’s home that this court adopted in State v. Brown does not apply.

Gibson v. Lawrence County

155 Ark. 319 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 23, 1922

of the township board, whose testimony tended to show that these lands were assessed on that basis, and that they were in uniformity with other assessments in the county. … Co. v. Fort Smith & Van Buren Bridge Dist., 113 Ark. 492 . Upon consideration of tbe testimpny, we are of tbe opinion tbat it is legally sufficient to support the finding of tbe trial court.

Arkansas State Game & Fish Commission v. Kizer

222 Ark. 673 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 23, 1953

Pierce v. Scott, 37 Ark. 308 ; Greenfield v. Peay, 137 Ark. 552 , 209 S. W. 730 . Yet here the board of engineers neither took testimony nor confined themselves to the record. … Thorn v. Glendenin, 12 Ark. 60 ; Wilson v. Fussell, 60 Ark. 194 , 29 S. W. 277 ; Boynton Land & Lbr. Co. v. Hawkins, 122 Ark. 374 , 183 S. W. 959 .

Isgrig v. Srygley

210 Ark. 580 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 4, 1946

Antell v. Stokes, (1934) 287 Mass. 103 , 191 N. E. 407 , is annotated in 134 A. L. R., p. 1274. … Wright, et al. v. Board of Education, 295 Mo. 466 , 246 S. W. 43 , 27 A. L. R. 1061.

Pulaski Gas Light Co. v. Remmel

97 Ark. 318 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jan 23, 1911

In the case of Hughes v. Arkansas & Oklahoma Rd. Co., 74 Ark. 194 , the court said: “In Fitzgerald v. … When that object was accomplished, the street became subj ect to the control of the city, and the board of commissioners no longer had control over it. Pine Bluff Water Co. v. Sewer District, 56 Ark. 205 .

Boyd v. Story

350 Ark. 56 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Sep 12, 2002

Swanberg v. Tart, 300 Ark. 304 , 778 S.W.2d 931 (1989); Brown v. McDaniel, 244 Ark. 362 , 427 S.W.2d 193 (1968). … In Brown, the court had four days to consider the taxpayers’ request to enjoin the election, and accordingly, it concluded that the best course was to let the election be held, leaving the parties to their post-election remedies

Willey v. State Ex Rel. Attorney General

178 Ark. 662 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Dec 10, 1928

When the new board came in and demand was made for payment, appellants had no right to withhold payment for fear that the State might breach the second contract. John A. Gauger & Co. v. … W. 157 , and cases cited therein; Famous Store Co. v. Lund-Mauldin Co., 149 Ark. 663 , 233 S. W. 767 .

Crews v. Crews

68 Ark. 158 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Apr 28, 1900

It is contended by appellant that this finding of the chaixcellor is tantamount to finding that both are equally at fault, and that, under the x'ule laid down in Cate v. … In Rose v. Rose, 9 Ark. 507 , it was held that it is not necessary that one be'entirely without blame to entitle him or her to a divorce.

West v. Belin

314 Ark. 40 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jul 12, 1993

See Liles v. Liles, 289 Ark. 159 , 711 S.W.2d 447 (1986); Brown v. Kennedy Well Works, Inc., 302 Ark. 213 , 788 S.W.2d 948 (1990). … See also Gipson v. Brown, 288 Ark. 422 , 706 S.W.2d 369 (1986); Gipson v. Brown, 295 Ark. 371 , 749 S.W.2d 297 (1988).

Craig v. Barron

225 Ark. 433 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 24, 1955

Stats. 1947, §§ 48-820 and 3-1205; Hubbard v. Watson, 218 Ark. 737 , 238 S. W. 2d 656 . Thus the appellees’ petition should have been filed in the county court by June 14, 1954. … We must conclude that the appellees’ petition was originally filed with the County Board of Election Commissioners, which was the wrong forum. The case of Casey v. Burdine, 214 Ark. 680 , 217 S.

Allred v. Arkansas Department of Correction School District

322 Ark. 772 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Dec 18, 1995

See also Love v. Smackover Sch. Dist., 322 Ark. 1 , 907 S.W.2d 136 (1995). … The Board of Correction acts as the school board for the district. § 12-29-301(c).

Chapman & Dewey Lumber Co. v. Bryan

183 Ark. 119 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 9, 1931

This rule was announced in the early case of Murphy v. Williams, 1 Ark. 376 , and has since been followed; indeed, the rule appears to be universal. Foohs v. Bilby, 95 Ark. 302 , 129 S. W. 1104 ; Harris v. … W. 244 ; Sager v. Jung & Sons Co., 143 Ark. 506 , 220 S. W. 801 ; Payne & Stockton, 147 Ark. 598 , 229 S. W. 44 ; J. C. Engleman, Inc., v. Briscoe, 172 Ark. 1088 , 291 S. W. 795 ; Fidelity Mut. Life Ins. Co. v.

Spencer v. Spencer

275 Ark. 112 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 8, 1982

Appellant appeals on the ground that the chancellor erred in granting her a divorce from bed and board and in making disposition of the property. … We held in the recent case of Mooney v. Mooney, 265 Ark. 253 , 578 S.W. 2d 195 (1979), that the property belonging to the parties could not be divided unless a divorce was granted.

Reeves v. Been

217 Ark. 67 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Apr 10, 1950

See Williams v. State, 160 Ark. 587 , 255 S. W. 314 ; Jewett v. Norris, 170 Ark. 71 , 278 S. W. 652 ; and Scaramuzza v. McLeod, Commissioner of Revenues, 207 Ark. 855 , 183 S. W. 2d 55 . … We recognize the legislative control thus given over matters of education in Little River County Board of Education v. Ashdown Special School District, 156 Ark. 549 , 247 S. W. 70 .

Washington v. State

319 Ark. 583 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 20, 1995

Appellant relies on Glover v. … The instant case is similar to Whitener v.