Case law

McCafferty v. Oxford American Literary Project, Inc.

484 S.W.3d 662 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Mar 31, 2016

Dist. v. … Chapman v.

Hinkle v. Broadwater

73 Ark. 489 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jan 7, 1905

Gaty v. Holcomb, 44 Ark. 216 ; Brown. v. Wyandotte & S. E. Ry. Co., 68 Ark. 134 ; Mooney v. Tyler, 68 Ark. 314 . The land conveyed was the homestead. … Stanley v. Snyder, 43 Ark. 434 ; Blythe v. Jett, 52 Ark. 549 . As to such property, there are no creditors. Then why should an intent to defraud them be predicated upon sqch an- act? We cannot see.

Washington County v. Davis

162 Ark. 335 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 11, 1924

We do not think that the case of Board of Education of Marion Township v. State (Ohio), 25 L. R. A. 770, has any application to the facts in the case at bar. … Wheeler v. Chicago (Ill.), 76 Am. Dec. 736 ; Smalley v. Paine, 102 Tex. 304 , 116 S. W. 38 ; People v. Board of Supervisors, 68 N. Y. 114 ; People v. Board of Supervisors, 51 N. Y. 401 , and Supervisors v.

Coleman v. Lofton

289 Ark. 573 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Sep 15, 1986

Barker v. Wingo, supra. … Coleman testified he lived on Brown Street in Wrightsville, not Little Rock.

Hestand v. Erke

227 Ark. 309 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 4, 1957

The Board has appealed. … King v. Abbott, et al., 43 Del. 472 , 48 A. 2d 745 , but the facts in that case distinguish it from the case under consideration.

Arkansas Transit Homes, Inc. v. Stone

301 Ark. 323 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 12, 1990

If we find that the evidence is evenly balanced, the Board’s view must prevail on appeal. Jones Truck Lines v. Camden-El Dorado Express, 282 Ark. 50 , 665 S.W.2d 867 (1984). … Corp. v. Bankers Dispatch Corp., 188 Neb. 584 , 198 N.W.2d 195 (1972); Matador Serv., Inc. v. Missouri Basin Well Service, 367 N.W.2d 749 (N.D. 1985); Stephens v. Public Service Comm’n, 356 S.E.2d 191 (W.

McDaniel v. Ashworth

137 Ark. 280 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 24, 1919

Justice Brewer in Railway v. … In Garland Power & Development Company v.

Nettles v. Hazelwood Road Improvement District No. 2

144 Ark. 632 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jul 5, 1920

Dist. v. Dudley, ante, p. 169. … Reitzammer v. Desha Road Imp. Dist. No. 2, 139 Ark. 168 .

Williams v. Dent

207 Ark. 440 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jun 12, 1944

American Jurisprudence, v. 43, § 212, p. 52. In Lucas v. Futrall, 84 Ark. 540 , 106 S. … In Carswell v. Hammock, 127 Ark. 110 , 191 S.

McQuay v. Guntharp

336 Ark. 534 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Mar 11, 1999

In Bailey v. … In so holding, this court overruled its previous decision in Brown v. St. Paul Mercury Ins. Co., 292 Ark. 558 , 732 S.W.2d 130 (1987).

Johnson v. Lane

199 Ark. 740 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jan 22, 1940

We have ■concluded under the authority of Pettit v. Stuttgart Normal Institute, 67 Ark. 430 , 55 S. W. 485 , that the deed from W. T. … Lane, Jr., and his wife to the Home Mission Board of the Southern Baptist Convention.

Bowman v. Phillips

260 Ark. 496 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 25, 1976

Restatement of Property, § 157, Comment j (1936); see also Steele v. Robinson, 221 Ark. 58 , 251 S.W. 2d 1001 (1952). The chancellor correctly found that W. D. … Phelps v. Domville, 303 S.W. 2d 601, 606 (Mo. 1957); Brown v. Brown, 67 W. Va. 251 , 67 S.E. 596 , 21 Ann. Cas. 263, 28 L.R.A. (n.s.) 125 (1910). That option is open to W. D.

Finn v. McCuen

303 Ark. 418 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 26, 1990

See also Ferstl v. … The cases In Rambo v.

Maxey v. Mack

30 Ark. 472 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 15, 1875

Walker v. Tarrant County, 20 Texas, 16 ; Sanders v. Metcalf, 1 Cooper Tenn. Ch. R., 424; Rice v. Smith, County Judge, 9 Iowa, 570 ; People ex rel. v. Mitchell & Warfield, 20 Illinois, 163; Sweat v. … Faville, 23 Iowa, 326 ; Board of Supervisors v. Keady et al., 34 Ill., 293 ; Edwards et al. v. Hall et al. (Prairie county seat case), ante.

Cain v. Carllee

168 Ark. 64 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 23, 1925

-.as May Browning, when she appeared on the list as Mrs. … Co. v. Randle, 85 Ark. 127 ; Thompson v. Southern Lbr. Co., 113 Ark. 380 ; Patterson v. Risher, 143 Ark. 376 ; New York Life Ins. Co. v. Adams, 151 Ark. 123 ; Davis v. Kelly, 152 Ark. 151 ; Gage v. Arkansas Central R.

U.S. Bank, N.A. v. Milburn

352 Ark. 144 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Apr 10, 2003

See, e.g., Fisher v. Chavers, 351 Ark. 318 , 92 S.W.3d 30 (2002); Chapman v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 351 Ark. 1 , 89 S.W.3d 906 (2002); Dodge v. Lee, 350 Ark. 480 , 88 S.W.3d 843 (2002); Sharp v. … In Crockett & Brown, P.A. v. Wilson, 321 Ark. 150 , 901 S.W.2d 826 (1995), the court discussed the requirements of Rule 11. We stated: . . . Rule 11 does not require that the legal theory espoused in a filing prevail.

Owens v. Atkins

163 Ark. 82 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Mar 3, 1924

Sorrels, 50 Ark 456 ; Taylor v. Armstrong, 24 Ark. 102 ; Matthews v. Bloodworth, 111 Ark. 545 , and other cases. … In Ruffner v.

Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Simpson

117 Ark. 156 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 22, 1915

Prior to the decision of the Supreme Court of the United States in the case of Western Union Telegraph Company v. Brown, 234 U. S. 542 , 58 L. … The sole question there considered was the application of the doctrine of Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Brown, supra, to the facts of that ease.

Blackwell v. State

36 Ark. 178 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 15, 1880

Wilson v. … In Shover v.

Rodriquez v. State

262 Ark. 659 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jan 16, 1978

The second was a brown car, pulling a U-Haul trailer and being driven by the appellant, who appeared to be a Mexican. … Upon that issue we fully agree with the position taken by the New York Court of Appeals in a similar case, People v.