Case law

Pitts v. Stuckert

111 Ark. 388 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 9, 1914

See Kirby’s Digest, § § 2836-7; Howard v. McDiarmid, 26 Ark. 100 ; Patton v. Coats, 41 Ark. 111 ; Clark v. Board of Examiners, 126 Mass. 285 , and other authorities cited in the brief of counsel for appellees. … The cases of Shibley v. Van Buren Bridge Co., 96 Ark. 410 , and Collier v. Board of Improvement, etc., 106 Ark. 151 , have no application.

Donaghey Foundation v. Little Rock University

231 Ark. 748 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 29, 1960

In Greene v. Thompson, 1 227 Ark. 1089 , 305 S. … of the Supreme Court of Arkansas in the case of Greene v.

Nashville Lumber Co. v. Howard County

89 Ark. 53 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jan 18, 1909

erroneous proceedings of the board while in session. … Young v. Gaut, 69 Ark. 114 . The case does not fall within the rule announced in St. Louis, I. M. & S. Ry. Co. v. Godby, 45 Ark. 485 , or Lesser v. Banks, 46 Ark. 482 , which are relied on by counsel for appellee.

Arkansas Department of Human Services v. Cole

380 S.W.3d 429 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Apr 7, 2011

BROWN, Justice. | ¡Appellants, the Arkansas Department of Human Services and its Director and his successors, and the Arkansas Child Welfare Agency Review Board and its Chairman and his successors, appeal an Order and Judgment … The State and FCAC maintain that unlike the sodomy statute in Jegley and the DHS regulation' preventing homosexuals from being foster parents in Department of Human Services & Child Welfare Agency Review Board v.

Johnson v. Dawson

365 S.W.3d 913 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jun 24, 2010

Board of Zoning Adjustment v. Cheek, 328 Ark. 18 , 942 S.W.2d 821 (1997). … BROWN, J., concurs. CORBIN, J., not participating. .

Wessell Brothers Foundation Drilling Co. v. Crossett Public School District

287 Ark. 415 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Dec 9, 1985

See Campbell v. Commonwealth of Pa.,_Pa._, 471 A.2d 1331 (1984). This arbitration board was chaired by Mr. … Had the board intended the award to be applied jointly, we think it would have expressly stated it in appropriate terms. The decision of the arbitration board on all questions of law and fact is conclusive. Kirsten v.

Jarvis v. Pague

137 Ark. 475 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jan 27, 1919

In Keith v. Herchberg Optical Co., 48 Ark. 138 -145 (see, also, Liddell v. Sahline, 55 Ark. 627 -29), the court said: “A special agency exists where there is a delegation of authority to do a single act. … In the recent case of Brown v. Gone, 130 Ark. 86 , the facts were, that one Cone, living at Montrose, Arkansas, sent his agent, John Shaw, to Eudora, Arkansas, to sell a carload of mules for him.

Linwood & Auburn Levee District v. State

121 Ark. 489 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Dec 13, 1915

The statute authorized the election of a board of levee inspectors which is constituted the governing board of the district. … Cole v. White County, 32 Ark. 45 -51; Martin v. Roesch, 57 Ark. 474 ; United States v. Herron, 20 Wall. 263 .

Jones v. Duckett

234 Ark. 990 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Apr 9, 1962

Rosser v. City of Russellville, 306 Ky. 462 , 208 S. W. 2d 322 . … This mandate was given effect in Wood v. Miller, 154 Ark. 318 , 242 S. W. 573 , and in Collins v. McClendon. 177 Ark. 44 , 5 S. W. 2d 734 . We recently held in Johnson v. Darnell, 220 Ark. 625 , 249 S.

Manila School District No. 15 v. Wagner

356 Ark. 149 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 19, 2004

AJ & K Operating Co., Inc. v. Smith, 355 Ark. 510 , 140 S.W.3d 475 (2004); Custom Microsystems, Inc. v. Blake, 344 Ark. 536 , 42 S.W.3d 453 (2001). … United Food and Commercial Workers Int’l Union v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 353 Ark. 902, 906 , 120 S.W.3d 89, 92 (2003) (citing Wilson v.

Henderson v. State

284 Ark. 493 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 4, 1985

Specifically, the records indicated that the appellant and Jeff Brown were not at the jail at the same time. … Russell and Davis v. State, supra; Thomas v. State, 273 Ark. 50 , 615 S.W.2d 361 (1981).

Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality v. Brighton Corp.

352 Ark. 396 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Apr 3, 2003

Brown v. Arkansas Dep’t of Correction, 339 Ark. 458 , 6 S.W.3d 102 (1999); Malone v. Trans-States Lines, Inc., 325 Ark. 383 , 926 S.W.2d 659 (1996); Hollingsworth v. … In Brown v. Arkansas Department of Correction, supra, this court again affirmed the trial court’s granting of a motion to dismiss.

Arkansas Uniform & Linen Supply Co. v. Institutional Services Corp.

287 Ark. 370 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 25, 1985

Appellants cite two cases: Adams v. Bryant, 236 Ark. 865 , 370 S.W.2d 432 (1963), and Halpert v. … In Adams v.

Cotton v. Ingram

114 Ark. 300 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 5, 1914

Peer v. Ryan, 54 Mich. 224 . A text book on the law of animals lays down a 'different rule, to the effect that under such circumstances it devolves upon the owner of the injured mare to prove negligence. … It is equally well settled in the law, however, that the principal is liaMe for the acts of Ms agent done within the apparent scope of his authority (Brown v.

Road Improvement District No. 1 v. Glover

86 Ark. 231 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · May 11, 1908

Railway Company v. Smith, 60 Ark. 221 ; Martin v. State, 79 Ark. 236 . … See also Cleveland v. Tripp, 13 R. I. 50; Davis v. Lynchburg, 84 Va. 861 ; Williams v. Detroit, 2 Mich. 560 ; Gatch v. Des Moines, 63 Ia. 718 ; Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. Pittsburgh, Wheeling, etc., Railroad, 17 W.

Robinson v. Felts

2015 Ark. 174 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Apr 16, 2015

Sims v. State, 2015 Ark. 41 (per curiam). … Hinkston v. State, 2014 Ark. 504 (per curiam).

Fausett & Co. v. Bullard

217 Ark. 176 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Apr 24, 1950

Hunt v. Davis, 98 Ark. 44 , 135 S. W. 458 ; Brown v. LeMay, 101 Ark. 95 , 141 S. W. 759 ; Whaley v. Niven, 175 Ark. 839 , 1 S. W. 2d 3 . … For instance, in Brown v. LeMay, 101 Ark. 95 , 141 S. W. 759 , the seller represented that a tract contained 35 acres when in fact there were only 30.9.

Smith v. City of Little Rock

279 Ark. 4 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Mar 28, 1983

Taylor v. City of LR, 266 Ark. 384 , 583 S. W.2d 72 (1979). … These objections were transcribed and furnished to the City Board before the meeting at which the rezoning decision was made. Hence, this case is unlike Wenderoth v.

Bailey v. ARKANSAS STATE BD. OF COLLECTION AGENCIES

283 S.W.3d 206 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Apr 17, 2008

See Franklin v. Ark. … See Richardson v. Perales, 402 U.S. 389, 402 , 91 S.Ct. 1420 , 28 L.Ed.2d 842 (1971); see also Smith v.

City of North Little Rock v. Pfeifer

515 S.W.3d 593 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Apr 6, 2017

The City petitioned the Pulaski County Board of Equalization (“the Board”) to reassess the properties after Pfeifer’s petition had been filed. … Barrows v. City of Fort Smith, 2010 Ark. 73 , 360 S.W.3d 117 ; Vanderpool v. Fidelity & Cas. Ins. Co., 327 Ark. 407 , 939 S.W.2d 280 (1997). In support of its position, the City cites Powell v.