Case law

Porter v. Waterman

77 Ark. 383 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jan 6, 1906

Scales v. State, 47 Ark. 481 ; Churchill v. Hill, 59 Ark. 54, 64 ; Leep v. Railway Company, 58 Ark. 407 ; St. Louis, I. M. & Sou. R. Co. v. Paul, 64 Ark. 95 , and cases cited; Watkins v. … Board of Levee Inspectors of Chicot County v. Crittenden, 94 Fed. Rep. 613. And it was competent for the Legislature to change its boundaries, as it did by the act of .April 24, 1905.

Green v. Abraham

43 Ark. 420 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 15, 1884

Wilson v. Traer, 20 Iowa, 231 ; Beaman v. Whitney, 20 Me., 413; Withers v. Baird, 7 Watts, 227 ; Brown v. Moore, 38 Texas, 645 ; Stevens v. Hampton, 46 Mo., 404 ; Hammers v. Dole, 61 Ill., 307 . … Watson v. Mercer, 8 Pet., 88 ; Chestnut v. Sham’s Lessee, 16 Ohio, 599; Newman v. Samuels, 17 Iowa, 528 ; Journeay v. Gibson, 56 Pa. St., 57; Shonk v. Brown, 61 Id., 327; Dulany v. Tilgman, 6 G. and J., 461; Deutzel v.

Bossen v. Woman's Christian National Library Ass'n

216 Ark. 334 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Dec 19, 1949

Ass’n. v. Fordyce, 79 Ark. 532 , 86 S. W. 417 , and Fordyce v. Woman’s Christian Nat’l. Lib. Ass’n., 79 Ark. 550 , 96 S. W. 155 , 7 L. R. A., N. S. 485. … W. 2d 605 ; State National Bank of Texarkana v. Bann, 202 Ark. 850 , 153 S. W. 2d 158 . In McCarroll v. Grand Lodge of I. O. O.

Hampton School District No. 1 v. Phillips

251 Ark. 90 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 4, 1971

Soderman v. Bell, 102 Ark. 83 , 143 S. W. 595 (1912). … Mason v. Jarrett, 218 Ark. 147 , 234 S. W. 2d 771 (1950).

GGNSC Holdings Inc. v. Chappel

453 S.W.3d 645 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Dec 22, 2014

Lamb; Betty Huebner, as Special Administrator of the Estate of Wilma Richey, deceased; Greg Brown, as Special Administrator of the Estate of Louise Brown, deceased; and Leon Robinson. 1 GGNSC argues on appeal Lthat the circuit … E.g., Bank of the Ozarks, Inc. v. Walker, 2014 Ark. 223 , 434 S.W.3d 357 .

Peterson v. Gresham

25 Ark. 380 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jun 15, 1869

Weaver v. Caldwell, exr., 9 Ark., 339. Owen, as admr., v. Jones, 14 ib., 503. Sharp v. Johnson, 22 ib., 79. Creary v. Sprague, 12 Wend., 41 . The defendant having proved by J. H. … Abraham v. Wilkins, 17 Ark., 292; Ingram v. Marshall, 23 Ark., 115; Wood v Wylds, 11 Ark., 754; Burton v. Merrick, 21 Ark., 357; McNeill v. Arnold, 22 Ark., 477.

Bourland v. Southard

185 Ark. 627 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Apr 18, 1932

McAdams v. Henley, 169 Ark. 97 , 273 S. W. 355 , 41 A. L. R. 629. … See Sudberry v. Graves, 83 Ark. 344 , 103 S. W. 728 .

Potlatch Corp. v. Arkansas City School District

311 Ark. 145 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 23, 1992

Tuthill v. … Board of Equalization v. Evelyn Hills Shopping Center, 251 Ark. 1055 , 476 S.W.2d 211 (1972). Because of the separation of powers doctrine, it is not within the province of state courts to assess property. Cook v.

Morris v. Torch Club, Inc.

278 Ark. 285 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 7, 1983

Motor Vehicle Commn. v. Cliff Peck Chevrolet, 277 Ark. 185 , 640 S.W.2d 453 (1982). This case is a sequel to Kemp-Bradford VFW Post 4764 v. … See Chandler v. Board of Trustees of the Teacher Retirement System, 236 Ark. 256 , 365 S.W.2d 447 (1963). Turning to the statutes, the initiated act prohibits the sale of intoxicating liquor in a dry county. § 48-802.

Carville v. Smith

211 Ark. 491 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Apr 14, 1947

If the board acts unfairly or oppressively, such conduct may call for a remedy ¿gainst the persons who compose the board, but it does not furnish ground for assailing the validity of the statute. . . . … On the question of the examination of plumbers as to their fitness and qualifications to ply their trade, the Supreme Court of Montana, in the case of State v.

Russell v. Watson Chapel School District

313 S.W.3d 1 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 19, 2009

Dist v. … See, e.g., Moffitt v. Batesville Sch. Dist, 278 |5Ark. 77, 643 S.W.2d 557 (1982); Ark. R. Civ. P. 52(a). See also Olsen v. East End Sch. Dist., 84 Ark.App. 439 , 143 S.W.3d 576 (2004).

Brewer v. Hall

36 Ark. 334 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 15, 1880

In the case of Walworth v. … In the case of Deloach v.

Stroud v. Crow

199 Ark. 814 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jan 15, 1940

In a case cited and relied on by appellees, State v. Gallagher, 101 Ark. 593 , 143 S. W. 98 , 38 L. R. A., N. … Shenk v. State Board of Examiners in the Basic Sciences, et al., 189 Minn. 1 , 250 N.

Fagg v. State

50 Ark. 506 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · May 15, 1888

In the cases of McPherson v. State, 29 Ark., 225 ; Winkler v. State, 82 Ib., 552; and Brown v. State, 34 Ib., 232, verdicts of manslaughter were returned without the degree of the offense being specified. … In Brown’s case these decisions were approved.

Walters-Southland Institute v. Walker

217 Ark. 602 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jun 19, 1950

Norden v. McCallister, 207 Ark. 1101 , 184 S. W. 2d 459 . In the early case of Bryan v. … After citing the rule stated in Bryan v.

Hal H. Peel & Co. v. Hawkins

175 Ark. 806 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Dec 12, 1927

This case was cited with approval in the case of Arkadelphia Milling Co. v. Green, 142 Ark. 565 , 219 S. … semimonthly for the purpose of checking up the bolts, staves and labor incurred in making them and for paying therefor by drawing checks against appellant to settle the labor accounts, and to pay Brown, or others at Brown

Marlin v. Harrison

218 Ark. 531 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Mar 12, 1951

Co. v. Linder, 207 Ark. 533 , 181 S. W. 2d 467 , in which we refused to set aside a judgment rendered against the company; (b) Better Way Life Ins. Co. v. Graves, 210 Ark. 13 , 194 S. … See Marlin v. Harrison, Receiver, 214 Ark. 342 , 216 S. W. 2d 45 .

Hill v. Gallagher

491 S.W.3d 458 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · May 5, 2016

See Hattison v. State, 324 Ark. 317, 920 S.W.2d 849 (1996); Klinger v. City of Fayetteville, 293 Ark. 128, 732 S.W.2d 859 (1987). 13. Furthermore, the Board finds that Ark. … Despite Gallagher’s and the Board’s evident disagreement with our decision in Davis, I take this opportunity to remind both Gallagher and the Board that it is for this court to decide what a statute means. Wagner v.

Hughes v. Firemen's Relief & Pension Fund

231 Ark. 877 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Mar 21, 1960

There the court granted the pension and the Board appealed to this Court. Firemen’s Relief v. Hughes, 229 Ark. 730 , 318 S. W. 2d 145 . … He was never awarded a pension by the Pension Board.

Improvement District No. 1 v. St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co.

99 Ark. 508 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jun 26, 1911

This holding is not in conflict with any ruling made in the cases of Ahern v. Board of Improvement, 69 Ark. 68 , Earl v. Board of Improvement, 70 Ark. 211 , and Board of Improvement v. Offenhauser, 84 Ark. 257 . … Overstreet v. Levee District, 80 Ark. 462 ; Driver v. Moore, 81 Ark. 80 ; Board of Imp. v. Offenhauser, supra; Osborne v. Board of Imp., 93 Ark. 563 ; Board of Imp. v. Pollard, 98 Ark. 543 . In the case of Moore v.