Case law

Miller v. Missouri Pacific Transportation Co.

225 Ark. 475 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 31, 1955

Co. v. Cunningham, 129 Ark. 346 , 196 S. … Our holding in the case of Moline Lumber Company v. Harrison, 128 Ark. 260 , 194 S. W. 25 , 11 A. L.

Merchants & Farmers Bank v. Harris Lumber Co.

103 Ark. 283 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Apr 22, 1912

Wolfe v. Irwin & Ward Co., 71 Ark. 438 ; Stiewel v. Webb Press Co., 79 Ark. 45 ; 10 Cyc. 1001. … In the case of Estes v.

Staton v. American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance

362 Ark. 96 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Apr 21, 2005

The issues in this case are virtually identical to those in Old Republic Surety Company v. … Cummings v. Big Mac Mobile Homes, Inc., 335 Ark. 216 , 980 S.W.2d 550 (1998).

Phillips v. Giddings

278 Ark. 368 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 11, 1983

The act provides: Certain school boards to be elected by zone. — The County Board of Education of each county encompassing a school district which may now or hereafter having [have] an average daily attendance in excess of … Dist. v. West Side Sch. Dist., 269 Ark. 151 , 599 S.W.2d 371 (1980).

Arkansas Department of Education Jacob Oliva, in His Official Capacity as Arkansas Secretary of Education Randy Henderson, Jeff Wood, Adrienne Woods, Steve Sutton, O. Fitzgerald Hill, Ouida Newton, Sarah Moore, Kathy McFetridge, and Lisa Hunter, in Their Official Capacities as Members of the Arkansas State Board of Education Friendship Education Foundation And Marvell-Elaine School District v. Doris Ivy Jackson Laverne Sims Jesselia Maples Diamacious Sims Darryl Harris Sylvia Moore Danielle Wright Derashaun McGhee Vivian Davis James Carruth Iola Hoskins Steven Grappe Veronica McClane And Citizens for Arkansas Public Education and Students (Capes), a Ballot Question Committee

2023 Ark. 140 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 12, 2023

ARKANSAS STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION; FRIENDSHIP EDUCATION FOUNDATION; AND MARVELL-ELAINE SCHOOL DISTRICT APPELLANTS V. … New Hampshire Sec’y of State, 136 A.3d 101, 106 (N.H. 2016); Brown v. Owen, 165 Wash. 2d 706, 722 (2009); Jefferson Cty. Comm’n v.

Perry v. Sadler

76 Ark. 43 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jun 17, 1905

written contract on November 11, 1890, containing, among many other clauses, this one: “Said Perry to deed, unincumbered, to said Sadler the Keywoód place, say about 68 acres, more or less, and 32 acres off lower side of Brown … Towell v. Etter, 69 Ark. 34 .

Davis v. State

330 Ark. 501 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 13, 1997

Witness Steve Brown Next, the appellant asserts that the trial court erred in permitting Steve Brown, Coordinator of the Fifth Judicial District Drug Task Force, to offer opinion testimony during the sentencing phase that … See Poyner v. State, supra. 7.

Mutual Aid Union v. Perdue

162 Ark. 551 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 18, 1924

See also Hogan v. Pacific Endowment League, 99 Cal. 248 ; Tobin v. Western Mutual Aid Society, 72 Iowa 261 ; Underwood v. Iowa Legion of Honor, 66 Iowa 134 , 23 N. W. 300 ; Baker v. Citizens’ Mut. Fire Ins. … W. 391 ; Bates v. Detroit Mut. Ben. Assn., 51 Mich. 587 , 17 N. W. 67 .

Spainhour v. Dover Public School District

331 Ark. 53 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jan 15, 1998

Citing Green Forest Public Schools v. … Hannon v. Armorel Sch. Dist. #9, 329 Ark. 267 , 946 S.W.2d 950 (1997); Lester v. Mount Vernon-Enola Sch. Dist., 323 Ark. 728 , 917 S.W.2d 540 (1996); Hamilton v. Pulaski County Special Sch.

Quattlebaum v. Davis

265 Ark. 588 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Apr 23, 1979

Green v. Shell, 239 Ark. 1161 , 397 S.W. 2d 363 (1965). As we view Ark. Stat. … Appellants rely on Lewis v.

Russell v. Pope

461 S.W.3d 681 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · May 7, 2015

Brown v. Gibson, 2012 Ark. 285, 423 S.W.3d 34 (per curiam). A court does have a ministerial duty to timely act upon pleadings filed in that court, regardless of the merit of those pleadings. Id. … Wells v. Laser, 2010 Ark. 142 (per curiam). An applicant for the writ carries the burden to demonstrate that the relief he seeks is merited. Brown, 2012 Ark. 285, 423 S.W.3d 34.

Hall v. State

161 Ark. 453 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Dec 3, 1923

Cook v. State, 130 Ark. 90 , and Kent v. State, 143 Ark. 439 . … Nash v. State, 120 Ark. 157 ; Bledsoe v. State, 130 Ark. 122 ; Monk v. State, 130 Ark. 358 ; Cole v. State, 156 Ark. 9 , and Cain v. State, 149 Ark. 616 .

Arkansas State Highway Comm'n v. Manning

252 Ark. 10 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Mar 6, 1972

Brown relating to damages to the landoiener’s house due to the noise from traffic and the hazard of trucks running onto appellee’s property. … See Clark County v. Mitchell, 223 Ark. 404 , 266 S. W. 2d 831 (1954). Point IV. The trial court erred in not striking the landowner’s testimony as to values. Appellant relies heavily on Arkansas State Highway Comm’n. v.

Patrick v. State

104 Ark. 255 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jun 24, 1912

Evans v. State, 58 Ark. 52 . … the statements made by Hugh Jett Patrick to his wife immediately after the difficulty and just before leaving the dance, notwithstanding they were made in the presence of appellant, as well as his statement and request of Brown

Jackson County Agricultural Credit Corp. v. Emrich

191 Ark. 1054 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jan 13, 1936

On April 12, 1934, Jess Brown who occupied the mortgaged premises during the foreclosure proceedings and one J. H. … The case of Clark v. Dickey, 190 Ark. 192 , 78 S. W. (2d) 824 , cited and relied upon by appellee is not opposed to these views.

Martin v. Frazier

291 Ark. 120 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jan 26, 1987

Yet they argue, citing Dunn v. Forrester, 181 Ark. 696 , 27 S.W.2d 1005 (1930), that the lack of a specified time limit implies a “reasonable” time limit. … Woodcock v. First Commercial Bank, 284 Ark. 490 , 683 S.W.2d 605 (1985); Ragland v. Alpha Aviation, Inc., 285 Ark. 182 , 686 S.W.2d 391 (1985).

State Use Calhoun County v. Poole

185 Ark. 370 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Mar 14, 1932

Several members of the board testified that Mr. … Board of Education v.

Reddick v. Scott

217 Ark. 38 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Apr 10, 1950

With respect to the Federal law the National Labor Relations .Board has held, in a decision rendered after that of the Board of Review, that the five men were not discriminated against on the basis of their union activity … Co. v. Mitchell, 206 Ark. 854 , 177 S. W. 2d 920 ; Paragould Laundry & Dry Cl. Co. v. Rogers, 210 Ark. 764 , 197 S. W. 2d 567 .

Ferguson v. McLain

113 Ark. 193 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jun 1, 1914

The first question presented was decided in the case of Shibley v. … It was decided in Little Rock v.

Warren v. Reed

231 Ark. 714 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 15, 1960

Jur. and in the case of McLain v. Miller County, 180 Ark. 828 , 23 S. … In the case of Smith v. Dandridge, 98 Ark. 38 , 135 S.