Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.32s
73 Ark. 194 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Dec 3, 1904
If he was a member of the board, under the decisions in Burns v. Thompson, 64 Ark. 489 , and School District v. … School District v. Bennett, 52 Ark. 511 .
Cited 17 timesPublished147 Ark. 252 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jan 31, 1921
Any other contract is unauthorized, in excess of the powers vested in the board and voidable at the election of the State.” Again in Hodges v. Lawyers’ Co-operative Pub. … Such is the holding of the Supreme Court of Montana in State v. Hogan, 56 Pac. 818 , and State v. Smith, 57 Pac. 445 .
Cited 27 timesPublishedOliver v. Ft. Smith Light & Traction Co.
89 Ark. 222 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jan 25, 1909
The seats were full when he boarded the car, but the running or foot boards were down, and there were then only three or four persons on the foot board. After this the car filled till it was very much crowded. … Little Rock Traction & Electric Co. v. Kimbro, 75 Ark. 211 .
Cited 6 timesPublished246 Ark. 293 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Mar 3, 1969
It provides as follows: “The board [State Penitentiary Board] shall prescribe- the mode- and extent of punishments to be inflicted on convicts for the violation of the prison rules; and any superintendent, subordinate officer … Walden v. Hart, 243 Ark. 650 , 420 S.W. 2d 868 (1967). Affirmed. Harris, O.J., disqualified. Holt, J., not participating.
Cited 4 timesPublishedOverstreet v. Levee District No. 1
80 Ark. 462 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 15, 1906
Stiewel v. Fencing District, 71 Ark. 17 . Copies of the records ©f the board of directors and assessors of the district were introduced in evidence. … Co. v. Waterworks Improvement District, 68 Ark. 276 ; Stiewel v. Fencing District, supra; Ritter v. Drainage Dist. No. 1, 78 Ark. 580 ; State v. Kidd, 125 Ala. 413 ; McCrory v. Manes, 47 Ga. 90 ; Smith v.
Cited 5 timesPublished114 Ark. 559 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 26, 1914
Co. v. Brown, 73 Ark. 42 , and Harkey v. Mechanics & Traders Ins. Co., 62 Ark. 274 . There was no necessity in this Industrial. Mutual Indemnity Co. v. … Co. v. Brown, 73 Ark. 42 .
Cited 13 timesPublishedNorth Hill Memorial Gardens v. Hicks
230 Ark. 787 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jun 1, 1959
We said in Newton v. American Sec. Co., 201 Ark. 943 , 148 S. … In addition to the above we found in Fentress v. Sicard, 181 Ark. 173 , 25 S. W. 2d 18 , and Blair v. Yancy et al, 229 Ark. 745 , 318 S.
Cited 2 timesPublished170 Ark. 366 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 8, 1926
One of the cases (Newton v. Altheimer) was formerly here on appeal under' the style of Moyer v. … Co. v. Wendell, 261 U.
Cited 12 timesPublishedSt. Louis Southwestern Railway Co. v. Kendall
114 Ark. 224 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jul 13, 1914
Co. v. … Co. v. Brown, 100 Ark. 123 ; Aluminum Company v. Ramsey, 89 Ark. 541 .
Cited 14 timesPublished306 Ark. 385 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Sep 9, 1991
When Stone returned to Arkansas from a five-week stay in Ohio, Patterson and Stone got back together, and Patterson asked Brown to stop seeing him. Brown persisted, however, and was with Patterson when he killed Dunham. … In Peals v.
Cited 12 timesPublishedR.K. Enterprises, LLC v. Pro-Comp Management, Inc.
372 Ark. 199 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jan 24, 2008
Brown, Justice. R.K. … Byme, Inc. v. Ivy, 367 Ark. 451, 457 , 241 S.W.3d 229, 235 (2006).
Cited 7 timesPublishedRoad Improvement District No. 4 v. Southern Trust Co.
152 Ark. 422 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Mar 13, 1922
(In commercial Law)” and cases there cited; Blevins v. Blevins, 4 Ark. 441 ; Huyck v. Meador, 24 Ark. 191 . … See Riggin v. Hilliard, 56 Ark. 476 ; Plummer v. School Dist. of Marianna, 90 Ark. 236 ; Bayou Meto Drainage Dist. v. Chapline, 143 Ark. 446 ; Henslee v.
Cited 10 timesPublished150 Ark. 244 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 24, 1921
Snetzer v. Gregg, supra; Sallee v. Dalton, 138 Ark. 549 ; Milwee v. Tribble, 139 Ark. 574 . … Cain v. Woodruff County, 89 Ark. 456 ; Humphrey v. Sadler, 40 Ark. 100 ; Throop on Public Officers, § 500. The General Assembly cannot delegate this legislative power to any individual, officer, or board.
Cited 41 timesPublished282 Ark. 43 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Mar 12, 1984
The appellant cites our decision in Brown v. Cheney, Commissioner, 233 Ark. 920 , 350 S.W.2d 184 (1961) in which we upheld the constitutionality of the residence requirement in the same statute at issue here. … Brown v. Cheney, supra, at 922 . There is nothing in the record to show that this evil is present in the instant case.
Cited 2 timesPublishedWilloughby v. Hot Springs Ice Co.
180 Ark. 231 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 28, 1929
Co. v. Benton, 86 Ark. 289 , 110 S. W. 1037 . … In the case of Manning v. Sherman, 110 Me. 32 , 86 Atl. 245 , 46 L. R. A. N.
Cited 3 timesPublished168 Ark. 1108 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jun 8, 1925
Mondschein v. State, 55 Ark. 389 ; and Abney v. Warren, 143 Ark. 572 . … Co. v. Hanniford, 49 Ark. 291 , and Little Rock v. North Little Rock, 72 Ark. 195 .
Cited 22 timesPublished199 Ark. 814 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jan 15, 1940
In a case cited and relied on by appellees, State v. Gallagher, 101 Ark. 593 , 143 S. W. 98 , 38 L. R. A., N. … Shenk v. State Board of Examiners in the Basic Sciences, et al., 189 Minn. 1 , 250 N.
Cited 7 timesPublishedWalters-Southland Institute v. Walker
217 Ark. 602 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jun 19, 1950
Norden v. McCallister, 207 Ark. 1101 , 184 S. W. 2d 459 . In the early case of Bryan v. … After citing the rule stated in Bryan v.
Cited 8 timesPublishedSchool District No. 29 v. Perkins
21 Kan. 536 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jan 15, 1879
~V. Colt and A. … On the back of said paper writing there was the following receipt, to wit: v Drywood Township, Oct. 21, 1873.
Cited 2 timesPublished225 Ark. 1059 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 27, 1956
Hughes v. State, 209 Ark. 125 , 189 S. W. 2d 713 ; Casteel v. State, 151 Ark. 69 , 235 S. W. 386 ; Larkin v. State, 131 Ark. 445 , 199 S. W. 382 ; Lowery v. State, 135 Ark. 159 , 203 S. W. 838 ; Burrell v. … Brown, alleging: “The juryman clearly displayed that he was prejudiced against the defendant. . . .” We have carefully examined the record, and it does not show any prejudice on the part of Mr. Brown.
Cited 2 timesPublished
Ask Donna