Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersark

10,000+ results

1.90s

  • Bland v. Verser

    299 Ark. 490 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jul 10, 1989

    In Dean v. … Verser’s separate contention that his remarks to the Board were privileged. See Navarro-Monzo v. Hughes, 297 Ark. 444 , 763 S.W.2d 635 (1989); Ikani v. Bennett, 284 Ark. 409 , 682 S.W.2d 747 (1985). Dr.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Willard v. Willard

    134 Ark. 197 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · May 20, 1918

    In the case of Bauer v. … But, as stated in Bauer v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Watson Chapel School District v. Russell

    367 Ark. 443 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 12, 2006

    See Fullerton v. Southside School Dist., 272 Ark. 288 , 613 S.W.2d 827 (1981). 1 In Maxwell v. … See also Lee v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • City of Little Rook v. Leawood Property Owners Ass'n

    242 Ark. 451 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Apr 24, 1967

    With respect to the Board of Adjustment it provides as follows (Ark. Stat. … Co., Thompson, Trustee, v.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Waggoner v. Weaver

    175 Ark. 1110 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jan 16, 1928

    In Brown v. Welch, 151 Ark. 142 , 235 S. … A majority of the court agree that the decision in Brown v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Kimbley v. State

    315 Ark. 653 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jan 31, 1994

    In Brown v. State, 304 Ark. 98 , 800 S.W.2d 424 (1990), we were presented with a similar question. Mr. Brown was charged and convicted of two robberies. … In Henry v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Tri-County Solid Waste District v. Arkansas Pollution Control & Ecology Commission

    365 Ark. 368 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Mar 2, 2006

    For example, in Arkansas State Racing Board v. … Arkansas State Racing Board, 346 Ark. at 375 . See also Arkansas State Police Comm’n v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Westchester Fire Insurance Company v. Tidwell

    199 Ark. 621 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jan 8, 1940

    Jack McKenzie, on behalf of appellants, testified that he was a special agent for the National Board of Fire Underwriters; that shortly after the fire he made an investigation as to the cause of it. … Riley Brown, on behalf of appellants, testified that he was assistant chief of the fire department of Hot Springs and had been for twenty-seven years.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Shofner, Administrator v. Jones

    201 Ark. 540 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Dec 9, 1940

    [See, also, Outlaw v. Yell, 5 Ark. 468 ; Dooley v. Watkins, 5 Ark. 705 ; McMorrin v. Overholt, 14 Ark. 244 ; Wright v. Campbell, 27 Ark. 637 ; Wolf v. Banks, 41 Ark. 104 ; Scott v. Penn, 68 Ark. 492 , 60 S. … W. 235 ; Hoshall v. Brown, 102 Ark. 114 , 143 S. W. 1081 ; James v. Gibson, 73 Ark. 440 , 84 S. W. 485 ; Brown v. Hanauer, 48 Ark. 277 , 3 S.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Paepcke-Leicht Lumber Co. v. Talley

    106 Ark. 400 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 3, 1913

    McDonough v. Williams, 77 Ark. 261, 272 ; Mann v. Urquhart, 89 Ark. 239 . … In Wood v.

    Cited 25 timesPublished
  • Lusk v. Perkins & George

    48 Ark. 238 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 15, 1886

    Cannon v. Davies, 33 Ark., 56; Abbott v. Rowan, ib., 593. … Allen v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • IN RE RULES FOR MINIMUM CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION (RULE 4 AND REGULATIONS OF THE ARKANSAS CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION BOARD (RULE 4.04)

    2020 Ark. 259 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jun 18, 2020

    (G) The Board is authorized to establish regulations that grant credit for pro bono publico service. … Access to Justice Foundation; (ii) The Arkansas Access to Justice Commission; (iii) The Arkansas Bar Association or a local bar association; (iv) Any state or federal court in Arkansas; or (v)

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Virden v. Roper

    302 Ark. 125 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Apr 23, 1990

    Brown emerged as the successful applicant. Following the hiring of Robert Brown, Roper filed an action in the United States District Court against the appellants individually and in their official capacities. … See Drake v. Scott, supra.

    Cited 24 timesPublished
  • Blanton v. Jonesboro Building & Loan Ass'n

    176 Ark. 315 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 20, 1928

    This view receives support from the following cases: Altheimer v. Board of Directors Plum Bayou Levee Dist., 79 Ark. 229 , 96 S. W. 140 ; Board of Directors St. Francis Levee District v. Fleming, 93 Ark. 490 , 125 S. … Francis Levee District v. Cottonwood Lumber Company, 86 Ark. 221 , 110 S. W. 805 , and Ritter v. Board of Directors of St. Francis Levee District, 128 Ark. 324 , 194 S. W. 13 . We do not think these cases apply.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Ferguson v. State

    362 Ark. 547 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jun 9, 2005

    Brown v. State, 719 So. 2d 882 (Fla. 1998). … Brown v. State, 719 So. 2d 882, 884 (Fla. 1998).

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Carswell v. Hammock

    127 Ark. 110 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jan 22, 1917

    Pine Bluff Water & Light Co. v. City of Pine Bluff, 62 Ark. 196 ; State ex rel. Attorney General v. Railroad Commission of Arkansas, 109 Ark. 101 . (2) It is admitted that the council has authority under Act. … Catlett v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. Hesterly

    98 Ark. 240 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 27, 1911

    Co. v. Brown, 67 Ark. 295 ; Northern Pac. R. Co. v. Babcock, 154 U. S. 190 , 38 L. Ed. 958 ; Slater v. Mex. Nat. R. Co., 194 U. S. 120 , 48 L. Ed. 900 ; 26 Cyc. 1079. … In Railway Co. v.

    Cited 18 timesPublished
  • McGhee v. STATE BD. OF COLLECTION AGENCIES

    243 S.W.3d 278 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 16, 2006

    Co. v. McGhee, 360 Ark. 562 , 203 S.W.3d 94 (2005); Arkansas Profl Bail Bondsman Licensing Bd. v. Frawley, 350 Ark. 444 , 88 S.W.3d 418 (2002); Cummings v. … In Lincoln v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Park v. Rural Special School District No. 26

    173 Ark. 892 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · May 2, 1927

    This contention is without merit, since that board had no authority to dissolve a special school district formed by an act of the Legislature. School District No. 25 v. Pyatt Special School Dist., 172 Ark. 602 . … No. 30 v. Pine Bluff, 142 Ark. 279 , 218 S. W. 661 ; Robertson v. Rural Spl. Sch. Dist. No. 9, 155 Ark. 161 , 244 S. W. 15 . Section 8840, C. & M.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Potocki v. City of Fort Smith

    279 Ark. 19 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Mar 28, 1983

    On February 3, 1981 the board of directors overruled its planning commission and rezoned the two lots. The chancery court sustained the board of directors in an order entered on April 7, 1982. … Maxwell v. Southside School Dist., 273 Ark. 89 , 618 S.W.2d 148 (1981). In the recent case of Taggart Taggart Seed Company, Inc. v.

    Cited 16 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.