Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersark

10,000+ results

4.25s

  • Maples v. State

    225 Ark. 785 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jan 9, 1956

    In reference to this statute in Brown v. State, 55 Ark. 593 , 18 S. … In commenting on the Brown case in the opinion in Hall v. State, 113 Ark. 454 , 168 S. W. 1122 , Judge Hart, speaking for the court, said: “In the case of Brown v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Hughes v. Lawson

    31 Ark. 613 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 15, 1876

    Brown Stat. Frauds, sec. 187 ; Deltz v. Parke, 1 South., 219 ; Simpson v. Nance, 1 Speer, 4; State Bank v. Mettler, 2 Boser, 392. … Kurtz v. Adams, 12 Ark., 174; Elder v. Warfield, 7 Har. & John., 391; Tileston v. Nettleton, 6 Pick., 509 ; 2 Par. Con., 9 ; Brown Stat. Frauds, sec. 212.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Attwood v. Estate of Attwood

    276 Ark. 230 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · May 24, 1982

    Brown v. … Rambo v. Rambo, 195 Ark. 832 , 114 S.W.2d 468 (1938). In the next instance we upheld an action based upon an adoptive father's having deliberately poisoned his adoptive son—an intentional tort. Brown v.

    Cited 26 timesPublished
  • Arkansas Power & Light Co. v. City of Little Rock

    243 Ark. 290 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 23, 1967

    Fidelity Deposit Company v. Fairfield, 169 Ark. 997, 278 S. W. 658. The circuit court does, however, try cases de novo on appeal from a municipal Board of Adjustment. Ark. Stat. Ann. § 19-2830.1 (Supp. 1965). … This point was very recently settled in the case of City of Little Rock v. Leawood Property Owners Association, 242 Ark. 451 , 413 S. W. 2d 877 , wherein we said: “Act 186 of 1957 was amended by Act 134 of 1965 (Ark.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Fort Smith v. Giant Manufacturing Co.

    190 Ark. 434 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 25, 1935

    Fort Smith v. United Rubber Co., 184 Ark. 588 , 42 S. W. (2d) 1004 . The court in that case also said: “The city, however, kept the machinery and continued to use it. … In other words, it should not retain the materials and use the structure, and refuse to pay the value thereof, when that result can reasonably be avoided. ’ ’ Howard County v. Lambright, 72 Ark. 330 , 80 S. W. 148 .

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Wilson v. State

    320 Ark. 142 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Mar 27, 1995

    Brown v. State, 316 Ark. 724 , 875 S.W.2d 828 (1994); Patton v. State, 281 Ark. 36 , 660 S.W.2d 939 (1983); Hinton v. State, 260 Ark. 42 , 537 S.W.2d 800 (1976). … Brown v. State, supra.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Read v. State

    63 Ark. 618 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Mar 27, 1897

    To sustain his contention he cited McClellan v. State, 32 Ark. 609 . … As said in Myers v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Doniphan Lumber Co. v. Cleburne County

    138 Ark. 449 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Apr 28, 1919

    The assessor or assessment boards cannot discriminate against one tract of land in favor of all other property of the same kind in the county. Drew County Timber Co. v. … Co. v. Ft. Smith & Van Buren Bridge Dist., 113 Ark. 493 ; Mo. Pac. Rd. Co. v. Conway County Bridge Dist., 134 Ark. 292 ; C. R. I. & P. R. Co. v. Road Imp. Dist. No. 1, 137 Ark. 587 , 209 S. W. 725 .

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Chapman v. Henderson

    188 Ark. 714 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jan 29, 1934

    Booth & Flynn Co. v. Pearsall, 182 Ark. 854 , 32 S. W. (2d) 404 ; International Harvester Co. of America v. Hawkins, 180 Ark. 1056 , 24 S. W. (2d) 340 . … Co. v. Hughes, 55 Kan. 491 , 40 Pac. 919 .

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • School District No. 49 v. Adams

    69 Ark. 159 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Mar 26, 1901

    of a meeting of the board of school directors, and protested against their action as a board, as in this case, the two could make no legal contract to bind the district. … This question was fully considered in Burns v. Thompson, 64 Ark. 489 , and this case is within the ruling in that, to which we adhere. The judgment is reversed, and the .cause is remanded for a new trial.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Waggoner v. Weaver

    175 Ark. 1110 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jan 16, 1928

    In Brown v. Welch, 151 Ark. 142 , 235 S. … A majority of the court agree that the decision in Brown v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Louisville, New Orleans & Texas Railroad v. Jackson

    123 Ark. 1 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Mar 6, 1916

    Levy v. Nash, 87 Ark. 41 ; McCoy v. … To the same effect see Brown v. Arkansas Central Ry. Co., 72 Ark. 456 ; Illinois Cent. Ry. Co. v. Allen, 39 Ill. 205 ; Toledo, Wabash & West. Ry Co. v. Morgan, 72 Ill. 155 ; Roberts v. Northern Pacific Rd. Co., 158 U.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Allstate Insurance Co. v. Dodson

    376 S.W.3d 414 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jan 27, 2011

    BROWN, Justice. | ¶Appellee and cross-appellant, Dr. Jon H. Dodson (Dodson), is a radiologist who built his medical practice in Little Rock and in Pine Bluff in the early 1980s. … Co. v.

    Cited 19 timesPublished
  • City of Little Rook v. Leawood Property Owners Ass'n

    242 Ark. 451 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Apr 24, 1967

    With respect to the Board of Adjustment it provides as follows (Ark. Stat. … Co., Thompson, Trustee, v.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Hertlein v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance

    323 Ark. 283 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 5, 1996

    GLAZE, BROWN, and ROAF, JJ., dissent. BROWN, Justice, dissenting. … Co., 245 Ark. 247 , 432 S.W.2d 485 (1968) and Brown v. St. Paul Mercury Ins. Co., 292 Ark. 558 , 732 S.W.2d 130 (1987), overruled in part by Bailey v.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • BNL Equity Corp. v. Pearson

    340 Ark. 351 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 10, 2000

    Brown, Justice. This is an appeal from an order by the trial court granting class certification to the proposed class under Ark. R. Civ. P. 23. … In Arthur v.

    Cited 31 timesPublished
  • Wisconsin & Arkansas Lumber Co. v. Fitzhugh

    151 Ark. 81 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Dec 12, 1921

    In the case of Wood v. … Jones v. Lewis, 89 Ark. 368 ; Massey v. Dickson, 81 Ark. 337 .

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • State Ex Rel. Attorney General v. Lovett-Carnahan Co.

    179 Ark. 43 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 25, 1929

    Pitcock v. State, 91 Ark. 527 , 121 S. W. 742 ; Jobe v. Urquhart, 98 Ark. 525 , 136 S. W. 663 ; and Allen Engine Company v. Kays, 106 Ark. 174 , 152 S. W. 992 . … Battle v. Thompson, 65 N. C. 406 ; Moore v. Tate, 87 Tenn. 725 , 10 Am. St. Rep. 712 , 11 S. W. 935 ; Commonwealth v. Owensboro N. & R. Company, 81 Ky. 572 ; and Commonwealth v. Todd, 9 Bush 708 .

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • O'Kane v. O'Kane

    103 Ark. 382 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Apr 29, 1912

    In regard to this question in the case of Brown v. Brown, 38 Ark. 324 , Mr. … Rose v. Rose, 9 Ark. 507 ; Magahay v. Magahay, 35 Mich. 210 .

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Young v. Young

    207 Ark. 36 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Mar 27, 1944

    W. 2d 29 ; White v. White, 196 Ark. 29 , 116 S. W. 2d 616 ; Carlson v. Carlson, 198 Ark. 231 , 128 S. W. 2d 242 ; Jones v. Jones, 199 Ark. 1000 , 137 S. W. 2d 238 ; Brooks v. Brooks, 201 Ark. 14 , 143 S. … Similar declarations are found in 2 Bishop on Marriage, Divorce and Separation, § 350, and in Brown on Divorce, p. 84.

    Cited 25 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.