Case law

Dickinson v. Housley

130 Ark. 259 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jul 9, 1917

Sanders v. Simmons, 30 Ark. 275 ; First National Bank of Fort Smith v. … Nelson v. Meek, Assessor, 127 Ark. 349 , 192 S. W. 202 .

Dowell v. State

191 Ark. 311 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Sep 23, 1935

Brown v. State, 154 Ark. 604 , 243 S. W. 867 , is cited and relied upon by appellant as supporting his contention in this behalf, and so it does, but must be overruled. Brown v. … Turner v. State, 100 Ark. 199 , 139 S. W. 1124 ; Turner v. State, 128 Ark. 565 , 195 S. W. 5 ; Smedley v. State, 130 Ark. 149 , 197 S. W. 275 ; Kyles v. State, 143 Ark. 419 , 220 S. W. 458 ; Pearrow v.

Nathan Special School District No. 4 v. Bullock Springs Special School District No. 36

183 Ark. 706 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Apr 27, 1931

That part of the act relevant to the question is as follows: “Any and all acts and proceedings heretofore done and had by the county boards of education are hereby ratified and declared valid.” In Allen v. … Williams v. Citizens, 40 Ark. 290 ; McCullough v. Blackwell, 51 Ark. 164 , 10 S. W. 259 ; Bordwell v. Dills, 70 Ark. 175 , 66 S. W. 646 . Thus stood the law at the time of this proceeding.

Williams Manufacturing Co. v. Walker

206 Ark. 392 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 29, 1943

Co. v. Emmons, 205 Ky. 21 , 265 S. … E. 248 ; Johansen v. Union, etc., Co., 99 Neb. 328 , 156 N. W. 511 ; Vandalia Coal Co. v. Holtz, 68 Ind. App. 670 , 120 N. E. 386 ; Schneider on Workmen’s Compensation, § 541; McGuire v.

Kirkwood v. Carter

252 Ark. 1124 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jul 17, 1972

Howard v. McDiarmid, 26 Ark. 100 ; Fitch v. McDiarmid, 26 Ark. 482 . … The appellees state in their brief that no one questions the duties of the Board to purchase voting machines; that the Board has never denied its duties to purchase voting machines and does not do so on this appeal.

City of Paragould v. Leath

266 Ark. 390 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jul 9, 1979

In spite of the language of Wenderoth v. City of Ft. Smith, 251 Ark. 342 , 472 S.W. 2d 74 (1971); and City of Batesville v. … Appeals to the circuit court from the Board of Adjustment are permitted. See Quapaw Quarter Assn. v. Bd. of Zoning Adj., 261 Ark. 74 , 546 S.W. 2d 427 (1977); and Arkansas Power & Light v.

Special School District No. 60 v. Special School District No. 2

181 Ark. 253 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Mar 10, 1930

Mitchell v. School District No. 13, 153 Ark. 50 , 239 S. W. 371 ; Acree v. Patterson, 153 Ark. 188 , 240 S. W. 33 ; and Manley v. Moon, 177 Ark. 260 , 6 S. W. (2d) 281 ; Swift v. … Manley v. Moon, 177 Ark. 260 , 6 S. W. (2d) 281 : School District No. 14 v. County Board of Education, 177 Ark. 734 , 7 S. W. (2d) 798 ; and Consolidated School District No. 2 v.

Nucor-Yamato Steel Co. v. CIRCUIT COURT FOR OSCEOLA DIST. OF MISSISSIPPI CTY.

317 Ark. 493 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jul 5, 1994

Brown, Justice. … He was injured at night when a crane operated by Nucor employee Tim Brown tipped over and struck him.

Book v. Polk

81 Ark. 244 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Dec 17, 1906

Searcy v. Yarnell, 47 Ark. 269 ; Newport v Railway Co., 58 Ark. 270 ; Prick v. Brinkley, 61 Ark. 402 ; 1 Beach, Pub. … . § § 457, 458; School District v. Goodwin, ante p. 143. The case of Hitchcock v. Galveston, 96 U. S. 341 , is much in point.

Attwood v. Estate of Attwood

276 Ark. 230 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · May 24, 1982

Brown v. … Rambo v. Rambo, 195 Ark. 832 , 114 S.W.2d 468 (1938). In the next instance we upheld an action based upon an adoptive father's having deliberately poisoned his adoptive son—an intentional tort. Brown v.

Boyles v. Knox

211 Ark. 426 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Apr 7, 1947

See, also, Reeder v. Epps, 112 Ark. 566 , 166 S. W. 747 ; Lasker-Morris Bank & Trust Co. v. Jones, 131 Ark. 576 , 199 S. W. 900 ; Emerson v. E. A. Strout Farm Agency, 161 Ark. 378 , 256 S. W. 61 . In Branch v. … Brown testified that he declined to join in the suit with appellee for recovery of his (Brown’s) part of the commission.

Duffield v. Benton County Stone Co., Inc.

369 Ark. 314 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Apr 5, 2007

See Matson, Inc. v. Lamb & Assocs. Packaging, Inc., 328 Ark. 705 , 947 S.W.2d 324 (1997) (holding that an order denying intervention is appealable); Cupples Farms P’ships v. Forrest City Prod. … See Billabong Products, Inc. v. Orange City Bank, 278 Ark. 206 , 644 S.W.2d 594 (1983). However, an order granting intervention is not appealable. See Corning Bank v.

Paschal v. State

388 S.W.3d 429 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Mar 29, 2012

BROWN, Justice, dissenting in part and concurring in part. … State v. McKenzie-Adams, 281 Conn. 486 , 915 A.2d 822, 832 (2007) (emphasis added), overruled on other grounds by State v. Payne, 303 Conn. 538 , 34 A.3d 370 (2012). Along the same lines, in State v.

Stay Strong, Status Quo, a Local Option Ballot Question Committee, and Bevans Family Limited Partnership v. Pam Bradford in Her Official Capacity as County Clerk of Van Buren County, Arkansas

609 S.W.3d 367 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 15, 2020

P. 12; Hargis v. Hargis, 2019 Ark. 321, 587 S.W.3d 208; Loveless v. Agee, 2010 Ark. 53, at 3 (citing Smith v. … Reeve v. Carroll Cty., 373 Ark. 2 I also note that in Stay Strong, Status Quo v.

Cole and Jones v. State

214 Ark. 387 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jan 10, 1949

See Smith and Brown v. State, 207 Ark. 104 , 179 S. W. 2d 185 and Guerin v. State, 209 Ark. 1082 , 193 S. W. 2d 997 . In Smith and Brown v. State we said : “. . . … In Smith and Brown v. State, 207 Ark. 104 , 179 S. W. 2d 185 the late and beloved Mr.

Fortman v. Texarkana School District No. 7

257 Ark. 130 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 21, 1974

Andrews Co. v. Delight Spec. Sch. Dist., 95 Ark. 26 , 128 S.W. 361 (1910). Our school laws unquestionably impose upon school boards the duty of providing orderly educational institutions. … The courts have been reluctant to interfere with the authority of local school boards to handle local problems. Our position was well stated in Safferstone v.

Jones v. State

498 S.W.3d 720 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Sep 15, 2016

Jones v. … Anthony Brown, Jones’s stepfather, testified that he had encouraged Jones to take the that the petitioner is entitled to no relief. Sparkman v. State, 373 Ark. 45, 48, 281 S.W.3d 277, 280 (2008).

School District No. 18 v. Grubbs Special School District

184 Ark. 863 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 30, 1931

The fact that he was a member of the county board of education did not preclude his signing the petition. In Carroll v. Lemon Special School District, 175 Ark. 274 , 299 S. … Hatfield v. School Dist., 178 Ark. 260 , 10 S. W. (2d) 374 ; Rural Special School Dist. v. First Nat. Bank, 173 Ark. 604 , 292 S. W. 1012 .

Gipson v. Crawfis

225 Ark. 903 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jan 30, 1956

In the case of Nixon v. Allen, 150 Ark. 244 , 234 S. … The case of Barber v. Edwards, 200 Ark. 940 , 141 S.

Ingram v. Thames

150 Ark. 443 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 14, 1921

It is essential that the board of improvement form plans and procure estimates (for the cost of the improvement. Mo. Pac. Ry. Co. v. Waterworks Imp. Dist., 134 Ark. 315 . … Board of Imp. Dist. v. Offenhauser, 84 Ark. 257, 268 ; Boles v. Kelly, 90 Ark. 29 ; Webster v. Ferguson, 95 Ark. 575 ; Bd. of Imp. v. Pollard, 98 Ark. 543 . The decree is therefore correct, and it is affirmed.