Case law

Wilson v. State

364 Ark. 550 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jan 12, 2006

State v. Brown, 356 Ark. at 466 , 156 S.W.3d at 726 . The Brown court held that the Arkansas Constitution requires law enforcement officers to advise home dwellers of their right to refuse consent to search. Id. … Under these circumstances, we conclude that State v. Brown, supra, is inapposite. In conjunction with her Brown argument, Wilson claims that the police violated Rule 2.2 of the Arkansas Rules of Criminal Procedure.

Andres v. First Ark. Development Finance Corp.

230 Ark. 594 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · May 18, 1959

In Halbert v. … Some of the cases are: McConnell v. City of Lebanon (Tenn.), 314 S. W. (2d) 12 ; Albritton v. City of Winona, 181 Miss. 75 , 178 So. 799 ; Dyche v. City of London (Ky.), 288 S. W. (2d) 648 ; and Miller v.

Bell v. Howard County Training School District No. 38

236 Ark. 742 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jun 3, 1963

No. 47 of Sevier and Polk Counties v. Millard, 203 Ark. 1121 , 160 S.W.2d 215 . … This act was held valid in the case of Dove v. Parham, D.C., 176 F.Supp. 242 . .

Noble v. Davis

204 Ark. 156 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Apr 27, 1942

Appellants rely on the case of Nebbia v. New York, supra; West Coast Hotel Co. v. Parrish, 300 U. S. 379 , 57 S. Ct. 578 , 81 L. Ed. 707 , 108 A. L. R. 1330; Board of Barber Examiners v. … Cr. 104 , 93 Pac. 2d 21 ; Arnold v. Board of Barbers, 45 N. M. 57, 109 Pac. 2d 779 .

Carr v. Young

231 Ark. 641 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 8, 1960

Such investigations are the usual practice among private employers, and, as the court pointed out in Garner v. Board of Public Works of Los Angeles, 341 U. … The prima facie validity of Act 10 is pretty well settled by the holding in Adler v. Board of Education of New York, 342 U.

St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co. v. Henson

61 Ark. 302 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 23, 1895

As a part of the necessary and customary equipment for such work, plaintiff was furnished with boarding cars, in which he lived, and boarded the crew of men working under him. … Co. v. Vick, id. 609; St. Louis, etc. R. Co. v. Welch, 10 S. W. 529 , and authorities cited.

Rogers v. Reliable Feed Company

169 Ark. 391 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 5, 1925

Brown, who had leased it to him. Mrs. Mada R. Brown filed ’an intervention, in the attachment proceeding for said property, claiming to be the owner thereof. Hpon the trial of the cause, H. N. … Adams v. Jacoway, 34 Ark. 542 ; McDonald v. Lowen, 130 S. W. 52 (Mo.); Lee v. Newton, 87 S. W. 790 (Ky.); Ourand v. Johnson, 98 S. W. 127 .

Jobe v. Urquhart

102 Ark. 470 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jan 15, 1912

State v. Thompson, 10 Ark. 61 ; United States v. North Carolina, 136 U. S. 211 ; United States v. Sherman, 98 U. S. 565 ; Angarica v. Bayard, 127 U. S. 251 ; Western & Atl. Rd. Co. v. State, 14 L. R. A. 438; Sawyer v. … Colgan, 102 Cal. 283 ; Molineux v. State, 109 Cal. 378 ; Auditorial Board v. Arles, 15 Tex. 72 . The act under discussion is silent on the question of interest.

Dell Special School District No. 23 v. Johnson

129 Ark. 211 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · May 21, 1917

School District v. Jackson, 110 Ark. 262 ; School District v. Hundley, 126 Ark. 622 , 191 S. W. 238 . … Texarkana v. Friedell, 82 Ark. 531 ; First National Bank of Waldron v. Whisenhunt, 94 Ark. 583 .

Harrill & Sutter, PLLC v. Kosin

378 S.W.3d 135 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 9, 2011

See Crockett & Brown, P.A. v. Courson, 312 Ark. 363, 368 , 849 S.W.2d 938, 941 (1993). … In Mobley Law Firm, P.A. v.

Read's Drug Store v. Hessig-Ellis Drug Co.

93 Ark. 497 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jan 31, 1910

Brown did not think any amount should be specified, as he hoped to make Read’s Drug Store a regular and permanent customer of his house for staple drugs. … Isham v. Greenham, 1 Hardy 361, quoted in Dodd v. Bartholomew, 44 Ohio St. 171 ; Union Central Life Ins. Co. v. Caldwell, 68 Ark. 521 ; Weinberg v. Naher, 22 L. R. A. (N. S.) 956, and 28 Am. & Eng. Ency. Law, p. 8.

Ward v. McMath

153 Ark. 506 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · May 15, 1922

The court also found a vacancy existing in the board of trustees, and appointed Captain M. D. Brown, a member of the camp, to fill the vacancy. … By analogy to the1 doctrine announced in Monk v.

Paschal v. State

388 S.W.3d 429 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Mar 29, 2012

BROWN, Justice, dissenting in part and concurring in part. … State v. McKenzie-Adams, 281 Conn. 486 , 915 A.2d 822, 832 (2007) (emphasis added), overruled on other grounds by State v. Payne, 303 Conn. 538 , 34 A.3d 370 (2012). Along the same lines, in State v.

Dinning v. Moore

90 Ark. 5 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Mar 22, 1909

In Byer v. … Aurora v. Fox, 78 Ind. 1 .

Dickinson v. Housley

130 Ark. 259 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jul 9, 1917

Sanders v. Simmons, 30 Ark. 275 ; First National Bank of Fort Smith v. … Nelson v. Meek, Assessor, 127 Ark. 349 , 192 S. W. 202 .

Hope Education Ass'n v. Hope School District

310 Ark. 768 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 2, 1992

Miller v. City of Lake City, 302 Ark. 267 , 789 S.W.2d 440 (1990); Foote’s Dixie Dandy v. McHenry, Adm’r, 270 Ark. 816 , 607 S.W.2d 323 (1980). … Arkansas Alcoholic Beverage Control Div. v. Person, 309 Ark. 588 , 832 S.W.2d 249 (1992); Arkansas Power & Light Co. v. Arkansas Pub. Serv. Comm., 275 Ark. 164 , 628 S.W.2d 555 (1982).

Nathan Special School District No. 4 v. Bullock Springs Special School District No. 36

183 Ark. 706 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Apr 27, 1931

That part of the act relevant to the question is as follows: “Any and all acts and proceedings heretofore done and had by the county boards of education are hereby ratified and declared valid.” In Allen v. … Williams v. Citizens, 40 Ark. 290 ; McCullough v. Blackwell, 51 Ark. 164 , 10 S. W. 259 ; Bordwell v. Dills, 70 Ark. 175 , 66 S. W. 646 . Thus stood the law at the time of this proceeding.

Lewis v. United Order of Good Samaritans

182 Ark. 914 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Dec 15, 1930

Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Richey, (Tex. Civ. App.) 18 S. W. (2d) 231 ; Bonnet-Brown Sales Service v. Utt (Mo.) 19 S. W. (2d) 888 ; 2 Black on Judgments, p. 1250. … Miller v. Brown, 170 Ark. 949 , 281 S. W. 904 . See Pickett v. Ferguson, 44 Ark. 177 ; National Exchange Bank of Tiffin v. Wiley, 195 U. S. 257 , 25 S. Ct. 76 ; Chicago Life Ins. Co. v. Cherry, 244 U. S. 25 , 37 S.

Duffield v. Benton County Stone Co., Inc.

369 Ark. 314 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Apr 5, 2007

See Matson, Inc. v. Lamb & Assocs. Packaging, Inc., 328 Ark. 705 , 947 S.W.2d 324 (1997) (holding that an order denying intervention is appealable); Cupples Farms P’ships v. Forrest City Prod. … See Billabong Products, Inc. v. Orange City Bank, 278 Ark. 206 , 644 S.W.2d 594 (1983). However, an order granting intervention is not appealable. See Corning Bank v.

Newton v. Calhoun County School District

232 Ark. 943 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Dec 19, 1960

No. 7 v. Johnson, 225 Ark. 982 , 286 S. W. 2d 841 . A waiver was found to have occurred in Sirmon v. Roberts, 209 Ark. 586 , 191 S. … No. 65 of Randolph County v. Wright, 184 Ark. 405 , 42 S. W. 2d 555 .