Case law

Pennington v. Oliver

245 Ark. 251 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Sep 30, 1968

This is in accord with the holdings of this Court in Faucette, Mayor v. Gerlach, 132 Ark. 58 , 200 S.W. 279 . … The Gerlach case also cited McClendon v. State, ex rel, 129 Ark. 286 , 195 S.W. 686 as holding “that the qualifications of a de facto alderman could not be inquired into in a collateral proceeding...”

Newton, Cir. Clk. v. American Security Company

201 Ark. 943 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 17, 1941

While the clerk is the nominal party, yet the planning boards are the real parties in interest. In discussing the constitutionality of zoning ordinances, this court said in the case of City of Little Rock v. … Co. v. Williams, ante, p. 895, 148 S. W. 2d 644 ; Jernigan, Commissioner, v. Loid Rainwater Co., 196 Ark. 251 , 117 S. W. 2d 18 ; Lion Oil Refining Co. v. Bailey, 200 Ark. 436 , 139 S.

Shepherd v. Washington County

331 Ark. 480 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 19, 1998

We recently set out the test for determining whether a case was correctly dismissed under Rule 12(b)(6) in Brown v. … Brown, 330 Ark. 435 , 954 S.W.2d 262 .

Commercial Printing Co. v. Rush

261 Ark. 468 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Apr 11, 1977

Laman v. McCord, 245 Ark. 401 , 432 S.W. 2d 753 (1968). … See U.S. v. Nixon, 418 U.S. 683 , 94 S. Ct. 3090 , 41 L. Ed. 2d 1039 (1974).

Gardner v. North Little Rock Special School District

161 Ark. 466 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Dec 10, 1923

In the case of Gates v. … In a case note to Manley v. Scott, 29 L. R. A. (N.

Lamar School District No. 39 v. Kinder

278 Ark. 1 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Dec 13, 1982

The fact that the school board was tolerant and did not terminate appellees at that time did not preclude it from nonrenewing at a later date if the coaches’ performance was still unsatisfactory. See School District v. … Partlow v. Ark. State Police Commission, 271 Ark. 351 , 609 S.W.2d 23 (1980). Here, there were several causes for appellees’ nonrenewal, none of which were arbitrary, capricious, or discriminatory.

Shepard v. McDonald

189 Ark. 29 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Apr 9, 1934

This proceeding is a continuation of the case of Shepard v. … In Westbrook v.

Worthington v. Roberts

304 Ark. 551 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 18, 1991

He observed that they were damaged by chemical drift which caused “a burning effect — browning of the leaves — defoliation.” The damage was “moderate to severe.” … As we pointed out in Turrise v.

Berry v. Saline Memorial Hospital

322 Ark. 182 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 23, 1995

Baxter County Newspapers v. Baxter Gen. Hosp. Staff, 273 Ark. 511 , 622 S.W.2d 495 (1981). … A member of a hospital’s board of directors holds a fiduciary relationship with the hospital. Warren v. Wheatley, 231 Ark. 707 , 331 S.W.2d 843 (I960).

Green v. Blanchard

138 Ark. 137 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Mar 24, 1919

In the case of State Medical Board of Arkansas Medical Society v. … The principle under discussion is well stated in the case of Czarra v. Board of Medical Supervisors, supra.

Stafford v. Cook

159 Ark. 438 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jun 18, 1923

We have decided that the Legislature did not exceed its powers in creating the board and conferring those duties upon it. Mitchell v. Directors of School District No. 13, 153 Ark. 50 . … Ferguson v. Wolchansky, 133 Ark. 516 .

Goodwin v. State

342 Ark. 161 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Sep 28, 2000

See Byrd v. State, 337 Ark. 413 , 992 S.W.2d 759 (1999); McElhanon v. State, 329 Ark. 261 , 948 S.W.2d 89 (1997); Brown v. State, 325 Ark. 504 , 929 S.W.2d 146 (1996); Thompson v. … . § 5-1-110 (b) (Repl. 1997)), and not the following cases cited in the majority opinion: Byrd v. State, 337 Ark. 413 , 992 S.W.2d 759 (1999); McElhanon v. State, 329 Ark. 261 , 948 S.W.2d 89 (1997); Brown v.

Smith Arkansas Traveler Co. v. Simmons

181 Ark. 1024 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jun 16, 1930

Brown- here really is the one that employed me. Court: I will ask Mr. Brown — Is there any insurance company interested in this case? Mr. Brown: Yes, sir. Court: The objection is overruled. … Pekin Stave & Manufacturing Co. v. Ramsey, 104 Ark. 1 .

Head v. Caddo Hills School District

277 Ark. 482 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Dec 6, 1982

Maxwell v. Southside School District, supra. The Act provides that a nonprobadonary teacher, “aggrieved by a decision of the school board”, has a right to appeal to the circuit court and then to this court. Ark. Stat. … But we have not decided a probationary teacher has a statutory right to appeal from a decision of the school board. In fact, we held that the statutory language quoted did not apply to a probationary teacher. Nordin v.

Haynes v. Riales

226 Ark. 370 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · May 14, 1956

The question presented is whether the position of auditor for Arkansas Burial Association Board is a civil office or a mere employment. In the case of Rhoden v. Johnston, 121 Ark. 317 , 181 S. … “An apt definition is given by the Supreme Court of the United States in the case of United States v.

Argenta Special School District v. Strickland

152 Ark. 215 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 27, 1922

The undisputed testimony shows that the appellant on August 8, 1919, at a meeting of its board of directors, by a majority of the board, discharged the appellee on the ground that his services were unsatisfactory. … J. sec. 768; Campbell Printing Press Co. v. Thorp, 36 Fed. 414 ; 1 L. R. A. 645 and note; Tiffany v. Pacific Sewer Pipe Co., 182 Pac. 428 , 6 A. L. R. 1493.

Arkansas Bank & Trust Co. v. Douglass

318 Ark. 457 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 31, 1994

Id.; Brimer v. Ark. Contractors Licensing Board, 312 Ark. 401 , 849 S.W.2d 948 (1993). … Cheney v.

Lee v. Big Flat Public Schools

280 Ark. 377 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 17, 1983

No. 39 v. Kinder, 278 Ark. 1 , 642 S.W.2d 885 (1982). We must affirm the trial court’s decision if not clearly erroneous. ARCP Rule 52. … Safferstone v. Tucker, 235 Ark. 70 , 357 S.W.2d 3 (1962). No basis for relief is established by this second contention. Affirmed. Adkisson, C.J., and Hickman and Hays, JJ., dissent.

Brad Hunter Smith v. State of Arkansas

2020 Ark. 410 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Dec 10, 2020

Henington v. … It is also not the role of the courts to add words to a statute to convey a meaning that is not there. 3 Rivers Logistics, Inc. v. Brown-Wright Post No. 158 of Am.

Three States Lumber Co. v. Moore

132 Ark. 371 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 25, 1918

Parsel v. Barnes, 25 Ark. 261 ; Jacoway v. Insurance Co., 49 Ark. 320 ; Liddell v. Sahline, 55 Ark. 627 ; Forrester-Duncan Land Co. v. Evatt, 90 Ark. 301 ; Brown v. Brown, 96 Ark. 456 . … Liddell v. Sahline, supra; Mutual Life Insurance Co. v. Reynolds, 81 Ark. 202 ; Jonesboro, Lake City & Eastern Rd. Co. v. McClelland, 104 Ark. 150 .