Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersark

10,000+ results

1.11s

  • Fitzgerald v. Walker

    55 Ark. 148 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 21, 1891

    Board of Improvement, 42 Ark., 152; Davis v. Gaines, 48 Ark., 386; In re Livingston, 121 N. Y., 105, 106 ; Bond v. Mayor, 19 N. J. Eq., 376; Little Rock v. … In the Farmers' Bank v.

    Cited 38 timesPublished
  • Moore v. Moore

    486 S.W.3d 766 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Mar 10, 2016

    More recently, we applied this analysis in Farrell v. Farrell, 365 Ark. 465, 475-76 , 231 S.W.3d 619, 626-27 (2006); see also Brown v. Brown, 373 Ark. 333 , 284 S.W.3d 17 (2008). … Layman, 292 Ark. 539 , 731 S.W.2d 771 (1987); Farrell v. Farrell, 365 Ark. 465 , 231 S.W.3d 619 (2006); Brown v. Brown, 373 Ark. 333 , 284 S.W.3d 17 (2008).

    Cited 35 timesPublished
  • Turner v. Adams

    178 Ark. 67 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 22, 1928

    Co. v. Waterworks Improvement District, 134 Ark. 315 , 203 S. W. 696 ; Ingram v. Thames, 150 Ark. 443 , 234 S. W. 629 ; Henry v. Board of Improvement, 170 Ark. 673 , 280 S. W. 987 ; and Carney v. … Kirst v. Street Improvement District No. 120, 86 Ark; 1, 109 S. W. 526 ; Lee Wilson Co. v. Road Improvement District, 127 Ark. 210 , 192 S. W. 371 ; Sikes v. Douglas, 147 Ark. 469 , 227 S.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Hethcox v. Stewart

    178 Ark. 235 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 5, 1928

    Stewart that appellee had stolen a steer and butchered it; that three of them saw him, and that if they would give him $40 he would compromise with Brown and skip the grand jury. … Auto Co. v. Arkadelphia Milling Co., 140 Ark. 73 , 215 S. W. 641 ; Covill v. Gerschmay, 145 Ark. 269 , 224 S. W. 609 ; Ermon v. Thomason, 149 Ark. 669 , 235 S. W. 54 . No error appearing, the judgment is affirmed.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Lamar School District No. 39 v. Kinder

    278 Ark. 1 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Dec 13, 1982

    The fact that the school board was tolerant and did not terminate appellees at that time did not preclude it from nonrenewing at a later date if the coaches’ performance was still unsatisfactory. See School District v. … Partlow v. Ark. State Police Commission, 271 Ark. 351 , 609 S.W.2d 23 (1980). Here, there were several causes for appellees’ nonrenewal, none of which were arbitrary, capricious, or discriminatory.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • American Insurance v. McGehee Liquor Co.

    93 Ark. 62 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Dec 20, 1909

    Brown v. Scott, 51 Pa. St. 357; Mooring v. Mobile Marine Dock & Mutual Insurance Co., 27 Ala., 254, 258 ; Myatts v. Bell, 41 Ala. 222, 231 ; Brabazon v. Seymour, 42 Conn. 551, 553 ; Bank of Ohio Valley v. … In Brown v. Scott, 51 Pa. St. 864, Mr.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Donahue v. Cowdrey

    246 Ark. 1028 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · May 26, 1969

    Donahue and Brown were both employed by Olint Reynolds Plumbing Company. … Ry. v. Stacks, 97 Ark. 405 , 134 S.W. 315 (1911); St. Louis, I.M. & S. Ry. v. Garter, 93 Ark. 589 , 126 S.W. 99 (1910).

    Disapproved by Steel Erectors, Inc. v. Lee, 253 Ark. 151 (1972)Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Allen v. Texarkana Public Schools

    303 Ark. 59 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jul 16, 1990

    It is not the function of this court to substitute its judgment for the circuit court or for that of the school board. Leola School Dist. v. McMahan, 289 Ark. 496 , 712 S.W.2d 903 (1986); Green Forest Pub. Schools v. … No. 39 v. Kinder and Wright, 278 Ark. 1 , 642 S.W.2d 885 (1982). In Ottinger v. School Dist.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Lindsay v. White

    212 Ark. 541 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Dec 15, 1947

    American Exchange Trust Co. v. Trumann Special School List., 183 Ark. 1041 , 40 S. W. 2d 770 ; A. H. Andrews Co. v. Delight Special School Dist., 95 Ark. 26 , 128 S. W. 361 ;” and again in Lewis v. … Post v. Board of Education of Clarksburg School Dist. et al., 71 W. Va. 52 , 76 S. E. 127 , and Ann. Cas. 1914B, p. 1238.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Watkins v. Griffith

    59 Ark. 344 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jun 23, 1894

    In State v. … Denver, 10 Col. 122 ; Jefferson Co. v. Mt. Vernon, 145 Ill. 80 ; Mulligan v. Smith, 59 Cal. 206 ; Hudson v. Jefferson Co. 28 Ark. 360 ; Ladd v. Spencer, 31 Pacific R. 474; Holland v. Baltimore, 11 Md. 186 ; Bouldin v.

    Cited 18 timesPublished
  • Henderson v. Little Rock School District

    333 Ark. 448 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jun 4, 1998

    Brown, Justice. This appeal arises out of appellant Sherry Lou Henderson’s employment with the appellee Little Rock School District as a fine arts-music teacher. … The circuit court granted summary judgment in favor of the School District and appellee Litde Rock School District Board Members.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Green v. Blanchard

    138 Ark. 137 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Mar 24, 1919

    In the case of State Medical Board of Arkansas Medical Society v. … The principle under discussion is well stated in the case of Czarra v. Board of Medical Supervisors, supra.

    Cited 21 timesPublished
  • Nance v. State

    433 S.W.3d 872 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · May 8, 2014

    She relies on this court’s decision in State v. | wBrovm, 356 Ark. 460 , 156 S.W.3d 722 (2004), and asserts that “the sensitivity of the Brown court to, and acknowledgment of, the coercive nature of the presence of law enforcement … Nance’s argument is wholly misplaced, as Brown is clearly distinguishable.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Seubold v. Fort Smith Special School District

    218 Ark. 560 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Mar 26, 1951

    We take judicial notice of the rules of the State Board of Health. (See State v. Martin, supra, and cases there cited.) … The Act 169 contains no express repeal of the powers theretofore exercised by the State Board of Health and sustained in State v. Martin (supra), and Allen v. Ingalls (supra).

    Cited 19 timesPublished
  • Howard v. State

    154 Ark. 430 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jul 3, 1922

    Rider v. State, 126 Ark. 501 ; Cazort v. State, 130 Ark. 453 ; Palmer v. State, 137 Ark. 160 . … The board and its personnel was provided for by section 8026 of Crawford & Moses’ Digest. Judicial notice will, therefore, be taken of its existence and personnel. Williams v. State, 37 Ark. 463 ; McCamey v.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Nall v. Kelley

    120 Ark. 277 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 11, 1915

    Butler v. Board of Directors of Fourche Drainage District, 99 Ark. 100 ; Alexander v. Board of Directors of Crawford County Levee District, 97 Ark. 322 ; Cox v. … In the case of Cox v.

    Cited 21 timesPublished
  • Frensley v. State

    291 Ark. 268 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 23, 1987

    Cook v. State, 283 Ark. 246 , 675 S.W.2d 366 (1984). Factors to be considered in lineup identification cases are set out in both federal and state law. See Manson v. Brathwaite, 432 U.S. 98 (1977); Cook v. … Among the cases cited is People v.

    Cited 21 timesPublished
  • Harbison v. State

    302 Ark. 315 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · May 21, 1990

    In Schraeder v. … In Isner v.

    Cited 31 timesPublished
  • Grimmett v. Askew

    48 Ark. 151 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 15, 1886

    Could the board of supervisors adjourn the meetings to another day beyond the six alloted them ? In Dunn v. State, 2 Ark., 229, this court upon the authority of Mechanics’ Bank v. … Latham v. Edgerton, 9 Cowen, 227; Borden v. Fitch, 15 John., 141 ; Mills v. Martin, 19 John., 33 . 3.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Firemen's Relief & Pension Fund v. Hughes

    229 Ark. 730 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Dec 1, 1958

    This Court cited the earlier cases of Atkinson v. Burt, 65 Ark. 316 , 53 S. W. 404 , and Perry County Bank v. Rankin, 73 Ark. 589 , 84 S. … Some of the subsequent cases citing' Lawhon v. Crow (supra) are: Ford Hardwood Lumber Co. v. Bryant, 178 Ark. 807 , 13 S. W. 2d 1 ; McCoy & Son v. Atkins, 167 Ark. 250 , 267 S. W. 779 ; and Haffke v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.