Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
5.48s
278 Ark. 41 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Dec 13, 1982
Roberts, Circuit Judge, 243 Ark. 987 , 423 S.W.2d 271 (1968); International Harvester Co. v. Lyle Brown, Circuit Judge, 241 Ark. 452 , 408 S.W.2d 504 (1966). … International Harvester Co. v. Lyle Brown, Circuit Judge, supra. Writ granted. Purtle, J., dissents.
Cited 8 timesPublished23 L.R.A. 264 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 3, 1894
In State v. Brown & Sharpe Manufacturing Company, 25 Atl. … As said in State v. Brown & Sharpe Manufacturing Co. 25 Atl.
Cited 67 timesPublished153 Ark. 188 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Apr 17, 1922
Hall v. Bledsoe, 126 Ark. 125 . … Lewis v. Young, 116 Ark. 291 ; Mitchell v.
Cited 10 timesPublished158 Ark. 247 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Apr 9, 1923
, this court took occasion to say, in the case of Maddox v. … Many cases supporting this text are collected in the following annotated cases: Wilson v. Board of Education, 13 Ann. Cas. 330 Kinzer v. Directors, 6 Ann. Cas. 996.
Cited 42 timesPublishedCity of Fayetteville v. Washington County
369 Ark. 455 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Apr 26, 2007
Brown, Justice. … In City of Hot Springs v.
Cited 18 timesPublishedSikes v. General Publishing Co.
264 Ark. 1 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jul 17, 1978
The Board was not required by law to make its determination after notice and a hearing. The Board heard no testimony. It made to findings of fact or conclusions of law. … Massey v. Enfield, 259 Ark. 85 , 531 S.W. 2d 706 (1976).
Cited 14 timesPublishedSt. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. Hydrick
109 Ark. 231 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jul 7, 1913
Brown v. Brown, 16 Ark. 202 . See also Hamilton-Brown Shoe Co. v. Choctaw Mercantile Co., 80 Ark. 440 . There was no prejudicial error in the ruling of the court in granting appellee’s prayer for instruction No. 6. … Co. v.
Cited 4 timesPublishedKirst v. Street Improvement District No. 120
86 Ark. 1 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Mar 30, 1908
This view of the meaning of the phrase "ad valorem” in our Constitution was adopted in Ahern v. Board, 69 Ark. 76 . See Chamberlain v. Cleveland, 34 Ohio St. 565 ; Jersey City v. Vreeland, 43 N. J. D. 638. … Here the facts cry out so loudly against the conclusion reached that we find no difficulty in agreeing with the court’s estimate of the board’s procedure.” See also People v. Reis, 96 N. Y. S. 597; People v.
Cited 40 timesPublishedCorbin v. Special School District
250 Ark. 357 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Apr 5, 1971
In Pugsley v. Sellmeyer, 158 Ark. 247 , 250 S. … And in White v. Jenkins, 213 Ark. 119 , 209 S.
Cited 9 timesPublishedMcLeod, County Judge v. Richardson
204 Ark. 558 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jun 22, 1942
Validity of Act 234, approved March 11, 1919, was upheld in Stafford v. Cook, 159 Ark. 438 , 252 S. W. 597 . (■See § 11 of the Act). … It was held in Gibson v. Davis, 199 Ark. 456 , 134 S. W. 2d 15 (December, 1939) the Act had not been repealed.
Cited 7 timesPublishedWashington Regional Medical Center v. Medical Care International, Inc.
289 Ark. 198 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jun 9, 1986
Statewide Health Coordinating Council v. General Hospitals of Humana, 280 Ark. 443 , 660 S.W.2d 906 (1983), cert. denied, 104 S.Ct. 2386 (1984).
Cited 2 timesPublishedJohnson, Administrator v. Murphy
204 Ark. 980 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 30, 1942
Simpson v. Brown-Desnoyers Shoe Co., 70 Ark. 598 , 70 S. W. 305 ; Brown v. Hutchings, 14 Ark. 83 .” In Kory v. East Arkansas Lumber Co., 181 Ark. 478 , 26 S. … Slagle v. Box, 124 Ark. 43 , 186 S. W. 299 ; Simpson v. Brown-Desnoyers Shoe Co., 70 Ark. 598 , 70 S. W. 305 , Brown v. Hutchings, 14 Ark. 83 .
Cited 4 timesPublished55 Ark. 148 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 21, 1891
Board of Improvement, 42 Ark., 152; Davis v. Gaines, 48 Ark., 386; In re Livingston, 121 N. Y., 105, 106 ; Bond v. Mayor, 19 N. J. Eq., 376; Little Rock v. … In the Farmers' Bank v.
Cited 38 timesPublished486 S.W.3d 766 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Mar 10, 2016
More recently, we applied this analysis in Farrell v. Farrell, 365 Ark. 465, 475-76 , 231 S.W.3d 619, 626-27 (2006); see also Brown v. Brown, 373 Ark. 333 , 284 S.W.3d 17 (2008). … Layman, 292 Ark. 539 , 731 S.W.2d 771 (1987); Farrell v. Farrell, 365 Ark. 465 , 231 S.W.3d 619 (2006); Brown v. Brown, 373 Ark. 333 , 284 S.W.3d 17 (2008).
Cited 35 timesPublishedKillian v. Hayes Bros. Lbr. Co.
251 Ark. 121 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 4, 1971
Brown, that the land was for sale. Oh January 18, 1969 Killian telephoned Charlie A. … Clay v. Brand, 236 Ark. 236 , 365 S. W. 2d 256 (1963).
Cited 5 timesPublished178 Ark. 67 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 22, 1928
Co. v. Waterworks Improvement District, 134 Ark. 315 , 203 S. W. 696 ; Ingram v. Thames, 150 Ark. 443 , 234 S. W. 629 ; Henry v. Board of Improvement, 170 Ark. 673 , 280 S. W. 987 ; and Carney v. … Kirst v. Street Improvement District No. 120, 86 Ark; 1, 109 S. W. 526 ; Lee Wilson Co. v. Road Improvement District, 127 Ark. 210 , 192 S. W. 371 ; Sikes v. Douglas, 147 Ark. 469 , 227 S.
Cited 6 timesPublished220 Ark. 755 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jun 16, 1952
See Baldwin v. State, 119 Ark. 518 , 178 S. W. 409 . (c). The appellant asked the witness, Vestal, a question, and this occurred: “The Court: You need not answer that question. “Mr. Brown: Save our exceptions.” … Brown: Objections. “The Court: I think it is a collateral matter — objection overruled. “Mr. Brown: Save our exceptions.”
Cited 8 timesPublished178 Ark. 235 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 5, 1928
Stewart that appellee had stolen a steer and butchered it; that three of them saw him, and that if they would give him $40 he would compromise with Brown and skip the grand jury. … Auto Co. v. Arkadelphia Milling Co., 140 Ark. 73 , 215 S. W. 641 ; Covill v. Gerschmay, 145 Ark. 269 , 224 S. W. 609 ; Ermon v. Thomason, 149 Ark. 669 , 235 S. W. 54 . No error appearing, the judgment is affirmed.
Cited 3 timesPublishedLamar School District No. 39 v. Kinder
278 Ark. 1 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Dec 13, 1982
The fact that the school board was tolerant and did not terminate appellees at that time did not preclude it from nonrenewing at a later date if the coaches’ performance was still unsatisfactory. See School District v. … Partlow v. Ark. State Police Commission, 271 Ark. 351 , 609 S.W.2d 23 (1980). Here, there were several causes for appellees’ nonrenewal, none of which were arbitrary, capricious, or discriminatory.
Cited 14 timesPublishedAmerican Insurance v. McGehee Liquor Co.
93 Ark. 62 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Dec 20, 1909
Brown v. Scott, 51 Pa. St. 357; Mooring v. Mobile Marine Dock & Mutual Insurance Co., 27 Ala., 254, 258 ; Myatts v. Bell, 41 Ala. 222, 231 ; Brabazon v. Seymour, 42 Conn. 551, 553 ; Bank of Ohio Valley v. … In Brown v. Scott, 51 Pa. St. 864, Mr.
Cited 5 timesPublished
Ask Donna