Case law

WARREN WHOLESALE CO. v. McLane Co., Inc.

374 Ark. 171 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Sep 11, 2008

(the Board) as section 15 of the Rules and Regulations of the Board. … Appellants rely on Gray v.

Erwin v. Erwin

179 Ark. 192 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Mar 18, 1929

'Counsel for appellant relies upon the principles of law decided in Brown v. Brown, 38 Ark. 324 ; Casteel v. Casteel, 38 Ark. 477 ; and Williams v. Williams, 150 Ark. 319 , 234 S. W. 169 . … Cohen v. Cohen, 150 Cal. 99 , 88 Pac. 270 , 11 Ann. Cas. 520; and Kistler v. Kistler, 141 Wis. 491 , 124 N. W. 1028 .

Sugar Grove School District No. 19 v. Booneville Special School District No. 65

208 Ark. 722 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · May 14, 1945

Perryman v. Bethune, 89 Mo. 158 , 1 S. W. 231 ; Noble v. White (Ky.), 77 S. W. 678 ; Gentle v. Board of School Inspectors, 73 Mich. 40 , 40 N. W. 928 ; Fractional School Dist. No. 3, etc., v. … Board of Inspectors, etc., 63 Mich. 611 , 30 N. W. 198 ; State v. Supervisors of Town of Clifton, 113 Wis. 107 , 88 N. W. 1019 .” In the later case of Acree v. Patterson, 153 Ark. 188 , 240 S.

Spear v. State

184 Ark. 1047 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Dec 21, 1931

In an interchange of shots between the two Brown was killed. … Co. v. Brown, 62 Ark. 254 , 35 S. W. 225 ; Whaley v. Vannatta, 77 Ark. 238 , 91 S. W. 191 ; Roberts v. State, 96 Ark. 58 , 131 S. W. 60 .

Allen v. Ingalls

182 Ark. 991 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Dec 22, 1930

In Auten v. School Board of Little Rock, 83 Ark. 431 , 104 S. … S.) 709; State v. Martin & Lipe, supra.

Block v. Allen

241 Ark. 970 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 6, 1967

Appellant contends that the apportionment made by The Board of Apportionment following the cases of Yancey v. Faubus, supra, and Faubus v. Kinney, 239 Ark. 443 , 389 S. … Following Faubus v. Kinney, supra, The Board of Apportionment, pursuant to the directions of Yancey v.

Pulaski County v. Commercial National Bank

210 Ark. 124 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · May 20, 1946

See Minneapolis Brewing Co. v. McGillivray (C.C.), 104 F. 258 ; State v. Miller, 146 Iowa 521 , 124 N.W. 167 ; City of Beatrice v. … Coe v.

Reed v. Alcoholic Beverage Control Division

295 Ark. 9 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Mar 14, 1988

Arkansas Cemetery Board v. Memorial Properties, Inc., 272 Ark. 172 , 616 S.W.2d 713 (1981). The ABC director put out a pickup order on the appellant’s permit because she had failed to pay a fine previously imposed. … We do not substitute our judgment for that of the board. Breed v. Carder, 282 Ark. 239 , 667 S.W.2d 660 (1984).

State Auto Property & Casualty Insurance v. Swaim

338 Ark. 49 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jun 10, 1999

State Auto sent another adjuster, Martin Brown, to handle these items. On October 9, 1996, Brown determined that $19,892.80 was an appropriate amount to pay the Swaims for these claims. … Ins. v. Allen, 326 Ark. 1023 , 934 S.W.2d 527 (1996); Parker v. Southern Farm Bureau Ins. Co., supra; Affiliated Foods Southwest, Inc. v. Moran, supra.

Mullinax v. State

327 Ark. 41 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jan 21, 1997

See Sitz, 496 U.S. 444 ; Brown, 443 U.S. 47 ; Delaware v. Prouse, 440 U.S. 648 (1979); and Martinez-Fuerte, 428 U.S. 543 . … Delaware v. Prouse, supra, at 663 . See United States v. Martinez-Fuerte, 428 U.S. 543, 558-562 (1976). Brown, 443 U.S. at 51 (emphasis added).

Starnes v. Sadler

237 Ark. 325 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Dec 2, 1963

W. 573 ; Collins v. McClendon, 177 Ark. 44 , 5 S. W. 2d 734 ; Fulkerson v. Refunding Board of Arkansas, 201 Ark. 957 , 147 S. W. 2d 981 ; Smith v. Faubus, 230 Ark. 831 , 327 S. W. 2d 562 ; Jones v. … County Judges v.

School District v. Bennett

52 Ark. 511 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 15, 1889

No notice of a regular meeting is necessary where the board has fixed stated times for them. Our views find support in many adjudged cases. Aikman v. School Dist., 27 Kan., 129 ; Hazen v. Lerche, 47 Mich., 626 ; Schl. … Dist. v. Jennings, 10 Ill., Ap., 643; Ballard v. Davis, 31 Miss., 533 ; Downing v. Rugor, 21 Wend., 178 .

Payne v. Jones

242 Ark. 686 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · May 29, 1967

We pointed out in Brown v. Brown, 218 Ark. 624 , 238 S. W. 2d 482 (1951), that a divorce decree awarding a child to the mother merely establishes the right of custody during the lives of the two parents. … J., and Brown, J., dissent.

Blackwell v. State

338 Ark. 671 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 7, 1999

United States v. Brown, 763 F.2d 984 (8th Cir. 1985). 3 In Brown, the court dealt with a pharmacist, Paul S. Brown, and his corporation that provided services under the Arkansas Medicaid Program. … Citing United States v.

Brasher v. Taylor

109 Ark. 281 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jun 30, 1913

Brown v. Bocquin, 57 Ark. 97 . … And we hold that the holding in Brown v.

Menser v. Danner

219 Ark. 130 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jun 11, 1951

Brown v. Parker, 217 Ark. 700 , 233 S. W. 2d 66 . Appellant argues that Brown v. Parker does not apply here because that case does not take into consideration § 75-623, Ark. … Also, in Brown v.

Warren v. McRae

165 Ark. 436 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Sep 29, 1924

Vincenheller v. Reagan, 69 Ark. 460 ; Lucas v. Futrall, 84 Ark. 540 ; Bruce v. Matlock, 86 Ark. 555 ; Middleton v. Miller County, 134 Ark. 514 ; McClendon v. Board of Health, 141 Ark. 114 . In the ease of Lucas v. … Patton v. Vaughan, 39 Ark. 211 ; Lucas v. Futrall, supra. The order of the State Board of Election Commissioners attempting to remove appellants from office was void.

Independence Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Citizens Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n

265 Ark. 203 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 26, 1979

Where such evidence exists, it automatically follows that the decision of The Board cannot be classified as unreasonable or arbitrary. Bockman v. … As stated in Arkansas Savings And Loan Association Board, et al v.

Heard Ex Rel. Heard v. Payne

281 Ark. 485 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Mar 5, 1984

City of North Little Rock v. Montgomery, 261 Ark. 16 , 546 S.W.2d 154 (1977) and Black v. Cockrill, Judge, 239 Ark. 367 , 389 S.W.2d 881 (1965). … Shinn v. Heath, Director, 259 Ark. 577 , 535 S.W.2d 57 (1976) and Duty v. City of Rogers & Benton County, 255 Ark. 309 , 500 S.W.2d 347 (1973).

Little Rock & Fort Smith Railway Co. v. Barker

33 Ark. 350 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 15, 1878

In Allen v. … This instruction is substantially in the language of one approved by the Supreme Court of Missouri in Brown v. Hannibal & St. Joseph R. R. Co., 50 Mo., 465 , and we see no valid objection to it.