Case law

Franklin v. Healthsource of Arkansas

328 Ark. 163 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Apr 21, 1997

NEWBERN, BROWN and IMBER, JJ., dissent. BROWN, Justice, dissenting. I dissent because I disagree that Higginbotham v. … NEWBERN and BROWN, J.J., join in this dissent.

Stith v. Pinkert

217 Ark. 871 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 13, 1950

Duggan v. Ogden, 278 Mass. 432 , 180 N. E. 301 , 82 A. L. R. 765. As stated by this court in Foster v. Graves, 168 Ark. 1033 , 275 S. … This Court held in Stout v. Brown, 64 Ark. 96 , 40 S.

Binns v. State

233 Ark. 259 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Mar 13, 1961

Brown v. State, 198 Ark. 920 , 132 S. W. 2d 15 . The undisputed evidence shows that the defendant was questioned almost continuously for a period of 52 hours before giving the first confession. … Brown v. State, 198 Ark. 920 , 132 S. W. 2d 15 ; Barnes and York v. State, 217 Ark. 244 , 229 S. W. 2d 484 .

Universal CIT Credit Corporation v. Stanley

225 Ark. 96 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · May 23, 1955

As was said in the similar ease of General Contract Corp. v. Duke, 223 Ark. 938 , 270 S. … Stats. 1947, § 68-609; Bailey v. Commerce Union Bank, 223 Ark. 686 , 269 S. W. 2d 314 . Affirmed. Seamster, C. J., not participating.

Caldwell v. Meshew

44 Ark. 564 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 15, 1884

Meshew, Brown and wife, Henderson and Avandana Brothers were made defendants to the bill. … (Heartman v. Franks, 36 Ark., 501.) But certainly in equity the assignee of choses in action must be permitted to enforce his rights in his own name.

Sanders v. State

259 Ark. 329 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 23, 1976

Appellant relies on Brown v. Illinois, 422 U.S. 590 , 95 S. Ct. 2254 , 45 L. Ed. 2d 416 (1975), wherein it was held that the giving of the warnings prescribed by Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 , 86 S. Ct. 1602 , 16 L. … App. 664 , 190 N.W. 2d 250 (1971); State v. Morsette, 7 Wash. App. 783 , 502 P. 2d 1234 (1972); State v. Brown, 261 Ia. 656 , 155 N.W. 2d 416 (1968); People v. Murphy, 28 Mich.

Wells, Fargo & Company's Express v. Crawford County

37 L.R.A. 371 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Mar 20, 1897

Sanford v. Poe, 17 Supreme Court Rep. 305; Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Taggart, 163 U. S. 1 ; Pittsburg Railway Co. v. Backus, 154 U. S. 421 ; Pullman Car Co. v. Pennsylvania, 141 U. S. 18 ; W. U. Tel. Co. v. … Ry. v. Worthen, 46 Ark. 312 . The rejection of such provision would not justify either the courts or board in treating the whole act as void.

CONSUMERS CO-OP. ASS'N v. Hill

233 Ark. 59 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 6, 1961

Cummins v. Bentley, 5 Ark. 9 ; Crane v. Randolph, 30 Ark. 579 ; Chapman & Dewey v. Osceola Dist., 127 Ark. 318 , 191 S. W. 220 ; Bassett v. Mutual Benefit, 178 Ark. 906 , 12 S. W. 2d 893 . … In Hall v. Bledsoe, 126 Ark. 125 , 189 S.

Jones v. Reed

267 Ark. 237 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Dec 3, 1979

Hall v. Bledsoe, 126 Ark. 125 , 189 S.W. 1041 ; Howell v. Todhunter, 181 Ark. 250 , 25 S.W. 2d 21 ; Pine Bluff Water & Light Co. v. City of Pine Bluff, 62 Ark. 196 , 35 S.W. 227 ; State v. … National Labor Relations Board v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp., 301 U.S. 1 , 57 S. Ct. 615 , 81 L. Ed. 893 (1936).

Brunson v. State

368 Ark. 313 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Dec 14, 2006

She testified that Brunson arrived home about an hour later, carrying the brown zippered bag. … IV The State’s Challenge of Prospective Juror Brown For his fourth argument, Brunson argues that the circuit court erred in allowing the State to challenge prospective juror Susan Brown for cause.

Lael v. Crook

192 Ark. 1115 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 5, 1936

The next case relied on by appellant is Clark v. Brown, 108 S. W. 421 . … The next case to which appellant calls attention is Douthit v. Stinson, 63 Mo. 268 . In this case it was said: “In Austin v.

Farm Bureau Lumber Corporation v. McMillan

211 Ark. 951 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jun 30, 1947

Co. v. Wallis, 82 Ark. 447 , 102 S. W. 390 ; Brown v. Arkebauer, 182 Ark. 354 , 31 S. W. 2d 530 ; Mo. Pac. R. Co. v. Benham, 192 Ark. 35 , 89 S. W. 2d 928 . … Airline, etc., v. Brown, an Alabama case, reported in 158 Ala. 607 , 48 So. 73 ; Risse v. Collins, 12 Idaho 689 , 87 Pac. 1006 ; Evans v. Highland, etc., Co., 27 Utah 475 , 76 Pac. 1135 ; Byrne v.

Loyd v. Knight

288 Ark. 474 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Apr 7, 1986

Arkansas State Highway Commission v. Mabry, 229 Ark. 261 , 315 S.W.2d 900 (1958). To require annexation to the adjoining districts is reasonable and practical. … We affirmed annexation to an adjoining school district across county lines under Act 229 of 1969, the precursor of Act 445 of 1983, in Saline County Board of Education v.

Graham v. Cawthorn

427 S.W.3d 34 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Apr 18, 2013

Brown v. City of Golden Valley, 574 F.3d 491 (8th Cir.2009). … E.g., State v. Brown, 356 Ark. 460, 466-70 , 156 S.W.3d 722, 727-29 (2004); Scott v. State, 347 Ark. 767, 784-88 , 67 S.W.3d 567, 579-82 (2002) (Hannah & Thornton, JJ., concurring).

Chapman v. Hamburg Public Schools

274 Ark. 391 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Dec 14, 1981

We are not backing away from our decision in Maxwell v. Southside School District, 273 Ark. 89 , 618 S.W. 2d 148 (1981). … In Maxwell we were unable to determine from the record all of the matters considered by the Board prior to voting not to renew Maxwell’s contract. The present case is factually similar to McElroy v.

Jackson v. Buchman

338 Ark. 467 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jul 22, 1999

See Campbell v. Vinjamuri, 19 F.3d 1274 (8th Cir. 1994); Gipson v. Younes, 724 So.2d 530 (Ala. Civ. App. 1998); Williams v. Memorial Medical Ctr., 460 S.E.2d 558 (Ga. Ct. App. 1995); Gossard v. … App. 4 Dist. 1997); Beis v. Dias, 859 S.W.2d 835 (Mo. Ct. App. S.D. 1993); Ward v. Epting, 351 S.E.2d 867 (S.C. Ct. App. 1986); Sommers v. Friedman, 493 N.W.2d 393 (Wis. Ct. App. 1992).

ARKANSAS VOTERS FIRST, A BALLOT QUESTION COMMITTEE BONNIE MILLER, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF ARKANSAS VOTERS FIRST AND OPEN PRIMARIES ARKANSAS, A BALLOT QUESTION COMMITTEE

2020 Ark. 265 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Aug 27, 2020

See Miller v. Thurston, CV-20-454 (Ark. July 28, 2020). Today, we concluded in a companion case that the criminal-background affidavit was fatally flawed for both proposed amendments. Miller v. … See Shipp v. Franklin, 370 Ark. 262, 267, 258 S.W.3d 744, 748 (2007). We will not address moot issues or issue advisory, academic opinions. Zook v. Martin, 2018 Ark. 304, at 2.

Ouachita Power Co. v. Donaghey

106 Ark. 48 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Dec 23, 1912

.” • In Gilmore v. City of Utica, 24 N. … Fitch v. McDiarmid, 26 Ark. 482 ; State v. Anderson, 76 N. W. 482 ; Am. & Eng. Ency. of Law, p. 753-b; 25 Cyc. 155; State v. Fagan, 27 Atl. (N. J.) 1089.

Arkansas Beverage Retailers Ass'n v. Moore

369 Ark. 498 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · May 3, 2007

State, supra, and Arkansas Alcoholic Beverage Control v. Muncrief, 74 Ark. … Moreover, a review of this court’s case law reveals a sole reference to the federal Administrative Procedure Act in Arkansas Savings & Loan Ass’ns Board v.

Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. Daniel

169 Ark. 23 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jun 15, 1925

Co. v. … Carter v. K. C. S. Ry. Co., 155 S. W. 638 . In E. L. Bruce Co. v.