Case law

Dennis v. State

503 S.W.3d 761 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 17, 2016

Brown said that as he was putting, gas in the tank, “Red” got into the driver’s seat of the Prizm. Brown protested, and as he approached his vehicle, someone struck him in the head from behind. … Brown ran away, but two young men caught up with him and demanded at gunpoint that he turn over the key to .the Prizm. Brown threw the key and ran.

Rhodes v. State

332 Ark. 516 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Apr 16, 1998

We affirmed the denial of Brown’s motion to transfer his case to juvenile court in Brown v. State, 330 Ark. 518 , 954 S.W.2d 276 (1997). … See Brown v. State, supra; Maddox v. State, 326 Ark. 515 , 931 S.W.2d 438 (1996); Ark. Code Ann. § 9-28-208 (d) (Supp. 1995).

Harris v. Daniels

263 Ark. 897 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jul 10, 1978

Stillman v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 161 Pa. Super. 529 , 56 A. 2d 380 (1948); James v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 6 Pa. Commonwealth 489, 296 A. 2d 288 (1972); Hinkle v. … Stillman v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, supra; Zielenski v. Board of Review, 85 N.J. Super. 46 , 203 A. 2d 635 (1964); Gatewood v. Iowa Iron & Metal Company, 251 Iowa 639 , 102 N.W. 2d 146 (1960).

Hale v. Road Improvement District No. 1

148 Ark. 316 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Apr 18, 1921

Counsel, in petition for rehearing, attempts to distinguish the instant case from that of Edgar v. Brown, supra, by stating that here the motion to dismiss was oral, while there it was in writing. … Counsel says that no competent testimony could have been heard on that motion; but in this he is mistaken, as appears from what we said in Edgar v. Brown, supra.

Frank Wheeler v. State of Arkansas

2025 Ark. 198 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Dec 4, 2025

See Brown v. Ohio, 432 U.S. 161, 168 (1977). … See Wheeler v. State, 2025 Ark. App. 407, at 11–12 (citing Brown v. State, 347 Ark. 308, 65 S.W.3d 394 (2001)).

Lenard v. Kelley

519 S.W.3d 682 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · May 18, 2017

Crawford v. … Johnson v. State, 2012 Ark. 212, at 5.

Bruce v. Matlock

86 Ark. 555 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jun 15, 1908

Buffalo v. Mackay, 15 Hun, 204 ; Bryan v. Patrick, 124 N. C. 651 . Counsel for appellants rely upon People v. Kilbourn, 68 N. Y. 479 , as sustaining their contention, but such is not the effect of that decision. … Off. § 362; State v. Pritchard, 36 N. J. L. 101.

C. & B. Construction Co. v. Roach

220 Ark. 405 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Apr 21, 1952

Can it be reasonably insisted that the laborer’s regular course of employment required him only to carry the board up to where it was to be used and that it was no part of Ms regular employment to put the board in place? … Second, a good rule already announced by this court appears in Simmons National Bank v. Brown, 210 Ark. 311 , 195 S.

Burnette v. Elsesser

180 Ark. 750 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Dec 23, 1929

Brown for a consideration of $350. … Davis v. Murphy, 177 Ark. 183 , 5 S. W. (2d) 936 . Appellant says he went into possession, made valuable improvements, and that appellee ratified the conveyance.

Maxwell v. Southside School District

273 Ark. 89 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jul 20, 1981

The board reversed proper procedure by making its decision first and then hearing the evidence. That action cannot be sustained. Kruse v. … Newton v. Calhoun County Sch. Dist., 232 Ark. 943 , 341 S.W. 2d 30 (1960); Barham v. Welch, 478 F. Supp. 1246 (E.D. Ark. 1979).

Chandler v. Perry-Casa Public Schools District No. 2

286 Ark. 170 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jun 3, 1985

Mourot, Freeman and Bailey v. Arkansas Board of Dispensing Opticians, 285 Ark. 128 , 685 S.W.2d 502 (1985). … Bunting v. Tedford, 261 Ark. 638 , 550 S.W.2d 459 (1977); Karoley v. Reed, 233 Ark. 538 , 345 S.W.2d 626 (1961).

Missouri Pacific Railroad v. Conway County Bridge District

134 Ark. 292 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · May 13, 1918

The point is ruled in Huddleston v. Coffman, 90 Ark. 219 , and Sharum v. Fry, 95 Ark. 385 . In the case of St. Louis & San Francisco Rd. Co. v. … Board of Improvement Waterworks Imp. Dist. v. Southwestern Gas & Electric Co., 121 Ark. 105 .

Crawford v. Davis

147 Ark. 126 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jan 24, 1921

survey of the land in December, 1885, and later saw him fencing the land with barbed wire in February, 1886; that Engles had cattle on .the land in the years 1886-1887, and 1888; that Andy Allen offered him $10' an acre and board … See Brown v. Bocquin, 57 Ark. 97 ; John Henry Shoe Co. v. Williamson, 64 Ark. 100 ; Driver v. Martin, 68 Ark. 551 ; Boynton v. Ashabranner, 75 Ark. 415 ; Earle Improvement Co. v. Chatfield, 81 Ark. 296 .

Rodgers v. La Quinta Motor Inn

316 Ark. 644 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Apr 18, 1994

On the other hand, La Quinta argues that Rodgers failed to prove that it had the required knowledge that brown recluse spiders were present on the premises. For support, La Quinta cites Kay v. … Here, Rodgers failed to present evidence that La Quinta knew the brown recluse spider was prevalent in the area where the motor inn is located, and that La Quinta or its employees had ever seen a brown recluse spider on the

Babers v. State

164 Ark. 381 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · May 19, 1924

The law of this subject was reviewed, and a similar question held incompetent, in the case of Murray v. State, 151 Ark. 331 . See also Doran v. State, 141 Ark. 442 ; Crofton v. State, 144 Ark. 164 ; Garrison v. … Moreover, we said in the case of Patrick v.

Harkey v. Mechanics' & Traders' Insurance

62 Ark. 274 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Apr 11, 1896

Brown v. Hartford Fire Ins. Co., 117 Mass. 479 ; Home Ins. Co. v. Howard, 111 Ind. 544 ; Vandervelden v. Chicago & N. W. Ry., 61 Fed. Rep. 54. … Gould v. Cayuga Co. National Bank, 86 N. Y. 75 ; Home Ins. Co. v. Howard, 111 Ind. 544 ; Brown v. Hartford Fire Ins. Co., supra; Bowden v. Spellman, 59 Ark. 259 ; Desha v. Robinson, 17 id. 240.

Goode v. Universal Plastics, Inc.

247 Ark. 442 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 27, 1969

Brown Broadcast, Inc. v. Pepper Sound Studio, Inc., 242 Ark. 701 , 416 S. W. 2d 284 (1967). Also, § 64-1202 is not applicable to contracts in which the transaction is wholly in interstate commerce. W. T. … Brown Broadcast, Inc. v. Pepper Sound Studio, Inc., supra. The evidence also supports the trial court’s determination that the performance of the contract involved an interstate transaction.

Atwood v. State

184 Ark. 469 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 26, 1931

Brock v. State, 171 Ark. 282 , 284 S. W. 10 ; Stribling v. State, 171 Ark. 184 , 284 S. W. 38 ; Chambers v. State, 168 Ark. 248 , 270 S. W. 528 ; Spivey v. State, 133 Ark. 314 , 198 S. W. 101 . … See also Satterfield v. State, 174 Ark. 733 , 296 S. W. 63 . Here a witness named Brown testified that he was a deputy sheriff, but did not state for what county.

Bright v. Johnson

202 Ark. 751 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jun 23, 1941

Hoshall v. Brown, 102 Ark. 114 , 143 S. W. 1081 . … The statement is quoted from an opinion by Chief Justice Bunn, the case 'being Jackson v. Gorman, 70 Ark. 88 , 66 S. W. 346 . It was held in the Hoshall-Brown Case, written by Mr. Justice Carroll D.

Patrick v. Arkansas National Bank

172 Ark. 1103 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 21, 1927

Lenon v. Brodie, 81 Ark. 208 , 98 S. W. 979 ; Sanders v. W. B. Worthen, 122 Ark. 104 , 182 S. W. 549 ; Massey v. Kissire, 149 Ark. 215 , 232 S. W. 24 ; McMillan v. Brookfield, 150 Ark. 518 , 234 S. W. 621 . … Crawford & Moses’ Digest, § 7795; Hamilton v. Brown, 88 Ark, 97, 113 S. W. 1014 ; Fox v. State, 102 Ark. 451 , 145 S. W. 228 ; First National Bank v. Allen, 141 Ark. 328 , 216 S. W. 1039 .