Case law

Burton v. State

314 Ark. 317 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 4, 1993

Scroggins v. State, 312 Ark. 106 , 848 S.W.2d 400 (1993). The prosecutor’s responsibility is to provide reports of scientific tests and any information or materials concerning witnesses he or she intends to call. … The trial court allowed Lieutenant Brown’s and Mr. Kemper’s testimonies reasoning that the subpoenas issued in their names were sufficient notice to appellant that the state intended to call them as witnesses.

Johnson v. Butler

494 S.W.3d 412 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jun 9, 2016

State Claims Comm’n v. Duit Constr. Co., 2014 Ark. 432, at 8 , 445 S.W.3d 496, 503 . Here, Butler’s complaint does not identify any conduct attributable to either Johnson or the Board that violates the AWBA. … Also, á suit against the board of trustees of a state university is a suit against the State. Id.

Paul Hardeman, Inc. v. JI Hass Company

246 Ark. 559 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Apr 7, 1969

Lyee Brown, Justice. … For example, Union Gold Mining Co. v. Crawford, 69 P. 600 (Colo. 1902); People v. Halbert, 248 P. 969 (Calif. 1926); and Smart v. Raymond, 142 S.W. 2d 100 (Mo. 1940).

Sewer Improvement District No. 1 v. Delinquent Lands

188 Ark. 738 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 5, 1934

Brown, 40 Ark. 423 : ‘The laws which are in force at the time when, and the place where, a contract is made and to be performed,. enter into and form a part of it. … S. v. City of Quincy, 4 Wall. 535 ; Sturges v. Crowninshield, 4 Wheat. 122 ; Bronson v. Kinzie, 1 How. 311 ; McCracken v. Hayward, 2 How. 608 ; Port of Mobile v. Watson, 116 U. S. 289 , 6 S. Ct. 398 .

Thomas Ex Rel. Inmon v. Inmon

268 Ark. 221 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Mar 10, 1980

The parties offer only two Arkansas cases as authority in this matter, and we find no others, Rambo v. Rambo, 195 Ark. 832 , 114 S.W. 2d 468 (1938), and Brown v. Cole, 198 Ark. 417 , 129 S.W. 2d 245 (1939) . … However, we easily distinguish the Brown case, as the suit there was for an intentional tort.

First Commercial Bank, N.A. v. Walker

333 Ark. 100 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Apr 30, 1998

Crockett & Brown, P.A. v. Wilson, 314 Ark. 578 , 864 S.W.2d 244 (1993). Here, the chancery court rendered a judgment for the Bank on the merits, but we reversed that decision for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. … In Schmidt v.

Chappell v. Chappell

83 Ark. 533 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jul 22, 1907

Rie v. Rie, 34 Ark. 37 ; Brown v. Brown, 38 Ark. 324 ; Scarborough v. Scarborough, 54 Ark. 20 . The evidence shows that appellee gets drunk occasionally.

Marshall v. Marshall

285 Ark. 426 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Apr 22, 1985

And in a more recent Arkansas case, Gentry v. … In a somewhat analogous situation in Williford v.

J.T. v. Arkansas Department of Human Services

329 Ark. 243 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jun 30, 1997

In Burdette v. Dietz, 18 Ark. … Appellant relies on Quilloin v.

Stephens v. Arkansas School for the Blind

341 Ark. 939 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jul 7, 2000

Simmons First Bank v. Bob Callahan Servs., Inc., 340 Ark. 692 , 13 S.W.3d 570 (2000); Myrick v. Myrick, 339 Ark. 1 , 2 S.W.3d 60 (1999). … See, e.g., State of Washington v. Thompson, 339 Ark. 417 , 6 S.W.3d 82 (1999); Fulmer v. State, 337 Ark. 177 , 987 S.W.2d 700 (1999); Loyd v. Knight, 288 Ark. 474 , 706 S.W.2d 393 (1986).

Barksdale v. State

255 Ark. 272 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 15, 1973

Lyle Brown, Justice. This is an appeal from a robbery conviction. Appellant advances five points for reversal. We find them to be without merit. … A brown bag containing money was found along the trail used by the two men. Appellant gave the officers a fictitious name.

Doster v. Manistee National Bank

48 L.R.A. 334 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jan 13, 1900

Brown to determine which of them has the superior right to certain lots in Little Rock. … ’s estate, just as though the legal title had been all the time in Brown.

Collin County Grain Co. v. Andrews

110 Ark. 597 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jan 12, 1914

The court erred in permitting the letters purporting to have been written by Brown Crain Company after the alleged sale of the car of oats in controversy to the appellant. … See, also, Cox Wholesale Grocery Co. v. National Bank of Pittsburg, 107 Ark. 601 , 156 S. W. 187 .

Arkansas Presbytery of the Cumberland Presbyterian Church v. Hudson Ex Rel. Jones

344 Ark. 332 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Mar 29, 2001

Churches v. … Brown, Imber, and Hannah, JJ„ dissent.

Ivy v. Republican Party

318 Ark. 50 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Sep 23, 1994

Brown, Justice., dissenting. I would deny the petition. … Buttolph Trust v. Jarnagan, 302 Ark. 393 , 789 S.W.2d 466 (1990); State v. Craighead County Board of Election Commissioners, 300 Ark. 405 , 779 S.W.2d 169 (1989); Gober v. Daniels, 295 Ark. 199 , 748 S.W.2d 29 (1988).

Jones v. Capers

231 Ark. 870 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Mar 21, 1960

In support of this appellee cites Monroe County v. Brown, 118 Ark. 525 , 177 S. … In the case of Strawn v. Campbell, 226 Ark. 449 , 291 S.

Travelers Casualty & Surety Co. of America v. Arkansas State Highway Commission

353 Ark. 721 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jun 19, 2003

Brown v. Arkansas State HVACR Licensing Bd., 336 Ark. 34 , 984 S.W.2d 402 (1999). However, sovereign immunity can be waived when the State is the moving party seeking affirmative relief. … Indeed, this court has held that a suit against the director, commission board members, and chief engineer for the State Highway Department was a suit against the State. See Solomon v.

U. S. Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Dorman

232 Ark. 749 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 21, 1960

In Herron Lumber Company v. Neal, 205 Ark. 1093 , 172 S. … In Bettendorf v. Kelly, supra, Kelly was engaged in driving nails into boards when he suffered his heart attack. Repeating our language in the Bryant Stave and Heading Company v.

Willis v. Circuit Court

342 Ark. 65 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Sep 15, 2000

Petitioners Arnell “Buck” Willis and the Phillips County Board of Election Commissioners have filed, alternatively, petitions for writ of certiorari, writ of prohibition, or writ of mandamus, asking this court to prevent

Clark v. Michael Motor Co., Inc.

322 Ark. 570 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Dec 4, 1995

Brown took the car to appellant Harold Clark, d/b/a Harold Clark & Son, an auto repair shop, for repair and storage. Brown defaulted, and in late 1992, Michael Motors filed a replevin complaint against Brown and Clark. … Id.; B & F Engineering v. Controneo, 309 Ark. 175 , 830 S.W.2d 835 (1992).