Case law

Robbins v. Horn

145 Ark. 475 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 25, 1920

Brown & Company. Cotton is delivered by sampies. Witness didn’t know anything about the appellees’ cotton. It was delivered to E. C. Brown & Company by samples. … Devine v. Warner, 96 Am. St. Rep. 216 . See, also, Rogers v. Jones, 129 Mass. 422 ; Taylor v. Godbold, 76 Ark. 395 ; Hodges v. Nall, 66 Ark. 135 ; Walnut Ridge Mercantile Co. v. Cohn, 79 Ark. 338 .

Miller v. State

253 Ark. 1060 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 19, 1973

Hubbard v. State, 10 Ark. 378 , 5 Eng. 378 (1850). In Price v. … “Ronnie [Brown, co-defendant] reached under the [car] seat and he gave it to Miller and Miller handed it to me, and I handed Miller the money and Miller handed the money to Ronnie Brown.” Miller was driving the car.

Pemberton v. State

292 Ark. 405 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jun 8, 1987

Parker v. State, 265 Ark. 315 , 578 S.W.2d 206 (1979); Stovall v. State, 233 Ark. 597 , 346 S.W.2d 212 (1961). … Ward v. State, 280 Ark. 353 , 658 S.W.2d 379 (1983); Blaney v. State, 280 Ark. 253 , 657 S.W.2d 531 (1983).

Browning's Restaurant v. Kuykendall

263 Ark. 374 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · May 1, 1978

In accordance with Tri State Ins. v. … See Wooten v. Mohawk Rubber Co. et al, 259 Ark. 837 , 536 S.W. 2d 734 (1976). 4.

Harris v. City of Fort Smith

359 Ark. 355 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 4, 2004

Neill v. Nationwide Mut. Fire Ins., Co., 355 Ark. 474 , 127 S.W.3d 484 (2003); BPS, Inc. v. Parker, 345 Ark. 381 , 47 S.W.3d 858 (2001). … Corp. v. Craighead County, 352 Ark. 76 , 98 S.W.3d 414 (2003); Cole v. Laws, 349 Ark. 177 , 76 S.W.3d 878 (2002).

James Winfield Wyatt v. Tyray Carr; Pulaski County Board of Election Commissioners; And John Thurston, in His Official Capacity as Secretary of State

592 S.W.3d 656 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jan 23, 2020

PC94-1-2137, State v. … No. 15 v.

Dortch v. Robinson

31 Ark. 296 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 15, 1876

Brown. … Bradley v. Hume, 18 Ark., 284; Frank et al v. Hedrick, ib. 304.

Dunn v. Dunn

114 Ark. 516 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 26, 1914

In the case of Brown v. … In this contention we think counsel are correct. (2) As was said in the case of Bell v.

Evans v. Blytheville, Leachville & Arkansas Southern Railroad

147 Ark. 28 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jan 10, 1921

Railway Co. v. Triplett, 54 Ark. 300 . … Briney, 58 Ark. 214 ; Railway Co. v. Triplett, supra; Bain v. Northern Pac. Ry. Co., 98 N. W. 244 ; International & G. N. R. Co. v. Hinzie, 18 S. W. 683 ; Smith v. Atlanta, etc., R. Co., 44 S. E. 664 ; Fort Smith Lbr.

Burton v. State

314 Ark. 317 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 4, 1993

Scroggins v. State, 312 Ark. 106 , 848 S.W.2d 400 (1993). The prosecutor’s responsibility is to provide reports of scientific tests and any information or materials concerning witnesses he or she intends to call. … The trial court allowed Lieutenant Brown’s and Mr. Kemper’s testimonies reasoning that the subpoenas issued in their names were sufficient notice to appellant that the state intended to call them as witnesses.

Thomas Ex Rel. Inmon v. Inmon

268 Ark. 221 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Mar 10, 1980

The parties offer only two Arkansas cases as authority in this matter, and we find no others, Rambo v. Rambo, 195 Ark. 832 , 114 S.W. 2d 468 (1938), and Brown v. Cole, 198 Ark. 417 , 129 S.W. 2d 245 (1939) . … However, we easily distinguish the Brown case, as the suit there was for an intentional tort.

Harrisburg School District No. 6 v. Neal

381 S.W.3d 811 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · May 26, 2011

See Couch v. Farmers Ins. Co., Inc., 375 Ark. 255 , 289 S.W.3d 909 (2008). … See Kinchen v. Wilkins, 367 Ark. 71 , 238 S.W.3d 94 (2006).

Robertson v. Lewis

195 Ark. 989 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Apr 4, 1938

Rodman v. Sanders, 44 Ark. 504 . … The court rendered a judgment against the Browns for $480 and they have not appealed. Perhaps they have already paid this judgment. Appellant sued only the Browns.

Bank of Jonesboro v. Hampton

92 Ark. 492 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Dec 6, 1909

Enc. of Eaw (2d Ed.) p. 711 and cases cited; Desty on Taxation, § 103; Orr v. State Board (Idaho), 28 Pac. 419 ; Hamilton v. State, 3 Ind. 452 . … Hacker v. Howe (Neb.), 101 N. W. 255 ; State v. Drexel (Neb.), 107 N. W. 110 . See, also, Adsit v. Lieb, 76 Ill. 200 ; Wells Fargo & Co. v. State Board of Equalization, 56 Cal. 194 ; Cummings v. Stark, 138 Ind. 94 .

Villines v. Harris

340 Ark. 319 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 10, 2000

Nora Harris, a property owner and taxpayer, appealed her reassessment to the Board of Equalization. … Dist. v. Speer, 75 F.2d 420 (8th Cir. 1935).

Railway Express Agency, Inc. v. Gee

197 Ark. 925 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Mar 6, 1939

Harvey Francis testified that he repaired the Gee car, and that the right door panel, the front and rear fenders and the running board were damaged, all on the right-hand side; the car had been struck about midship; the repair … The authorities on this question are discussed in McCord v. Bailey & Mills, 195 Ark. 862 , 114 S. W. 2d 840 .

Sewer Improvement District No. 1 v. Delinquent Lands

188 Ark. 738 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 5, 1934

Brown, 40 Ark. 423 : ‘The laws which are in force at the time when, and the place where, a contract is made and to be performed,. enter into and form a part of it. … S. v. City of Quincy, 4 Wall. 535 ; Sturges v. Crowninshield, 4 Wheat. 122 ; Bronson v. Kinzie, 1 How. 311 ; McCracken v. Hayward, 2 How. 608 ; Port of Mobile v. Watson, 116 U. S. 289 , 6 S. Ct. 398 .

Southall v. Little Rock Newspapers, Inc.

332 Ark. 123 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Mar 5, 1998

Daily Banner-News Publishing Co., Inc., 274 Ark. 145 , 622 S.W.2d 671 (1981) ), and a chairman of the board of governors of a county memorial hospital (see Drew v. … Brown and Imber, JJ., not participating. Appellants’ complaint also named Walter E.

Carson v. State

206 Ark. 80 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jul 12, 1943

Carson was standing in the office in the middle of the store leaning on a board which separates the store from the office and was facing the front. Mrs. Carson was in the east side of the office near the wall. … Simpson v. State, 56 Ark. 8 , 19 S. W. 99 ; Brown v. State, 34 Ark. 232 .’ . . .

Red Bud Realty Co. v. South

153 Ark. 380 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · May 1, 1922

J. 416, 434 et seq. to 440 inclusive; Stewart v. Smith, 91 Pa. 667 ; Brown v. Guaranty & Trust Co., 128 U. S. 403 ; Horner-Gaylord Co. v. Miller & Bennett, 147 Fed. 295 ; Venner v. Great Northern Ry. Co., 136 N. … Such an action cannot ordinarily be maintained except by the corporation itself in an action authorized by its board of directors. Holmes v. Jewett, 134 Pac. 665 ; Dumpfel v. O. & M. R. Co., 110 U. S. 209 ; Smith v.