Case law

Jordon v. McCabe

209 Ark. 788 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 18, 1946

On this appeal Jordon has waived all questions except the plea of res judicata, and relies most strongly on the ease of Browne-Hinton Wholesole Grocery Co. v. Grubbs, 172 Ark. 796 , 291 S. W. 65 . … There is no occasion at this time for us to comment on the holding in the Browne-Hinton case, supra, as compared with the holding in such cases as Jernigan v. Pfeifer Bros., 177 Ark. 145 , 5 S. W. 2d 941 , and Floyd v.

Helton v. Jacobs

346 Ark. 344 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 25, 2001

Brown, Justice. Pending before this court are two matters. … First, there is the appeal of appellants Roy Helton (Helton) and the members of the Phillips County Board of Election Commissioners (Election Commission) from the order of the circuit court, granting appellee Arlanda Jacobs

Philip Palade, Gregory Borse, and J. Thomas Sullivan, on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated v. Board of Trustees of the University of Arkansas System Ed Fryar, ph.D., in His Official Capacity as Trustee Steve Cox, in His Official Capacity as Trustee Tommy Boyer, in His Official Capacity as Trustee Sheffield Nelson, in His Official Capacity as Trustee C.C. Gibson, in His Official Capacity as Trustee Stephen Broughton, M.D., in His Official Capacity as Trustee Kelly Eichler, in Her Official Capacity as Trustee Morril Harriman, in His Official Capacity as Trustee Mark Waldrip, in His Official Capacity as Trustee And John Goodson, in His Official Capacity as Trustee

2022 Ark. 119 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jun 2, 2022

Baptist Health Sys. v. Rutledge, 2016 Ark. 121, 488 S.W.3d 507; Nelson v. Ark. Rural Med. Practice Loan & Scholarship Bd., 2011 Ark. 491, 385 S.W.3d 762. … As the Board asserts, however, a plaintiff making an overbreadth claim still must establish standing and an actual or impending injury. See, e.g., Advantage Media, LLC v.

Gates & Bro. v. Steele

48 Ark. 539 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 15, 1886

Brown v. Brown’s Administrator, 68 Mo., 388 ; Whitehead v. Tapp, 69 ib., 415; Pardo v. Bittorf, 48 Mich., 275 . 2. Same: temión.In" The other point presents a closer question. … .; Tomlinson v. Swiney, 22 Ark., 400; Euper v. Alkire; 37 ib., 283; Brown v. Watson, 41 ib., 309.

Dessert Seed Co. v. Drew Farmers Supply, Inc.

248 Ark. 858 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jun 1, 1970

Walcott & Steele, Inc. v. Carpenter, 246 Ark. 95 , 436 S. W. 2d 820 (Feb. 10, 1969). … White-Wilson-Drew Co. v. Egelhoff, 96 Ark. 105 , 131 S. W. 208 (1910). Affirmed.

Green v. Robertson

80 Ark. 1 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jul 9, 1906

Brown v. J. F. Reid, stating that the assignment had been made 1o him, and asking that his rights be protected. … Dunsmoor v. Furstenfeldt, 88 Cal. 522 ; Weaver v. Davis, 47 Ill. 235 ; Willard v. Decatur, 59 N. H. 137; Wilbur v.

Ark. State Highway Comm. v. Hughes

240 Ark. 962 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · May 30, 1966

Comm. v. Watkins, 229 Ark. 27 , 313 S. … In Burford v. Upton, 232 Ark. 456 , 338 S.

Smith v. State

169 Ark. 913 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 23, 1925

Brown asked him if he knew where the car was at that time, and Smith replied that he did not. Brown then told Smith that he was accused of being mixed up in the matter. … This view is in accord with Wills v. People, 3 Parker’s Cr. Rep. (N. Y.), p. 473.

Browning's Restaurant v. Kuykendall

263 Ark. 374 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · May 1, 1978

In accordance with Tri State Ins. v. … See Wooten v. Mohawk Rubber Co. et al, 259 Ark. 837 , 536 S.W. 2d 734 (1976). 4.

Kevonce Ephriam v. State of Arkansas

2024 Ark. 21 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 15, 2024

Armstrong v. State, 2020 Ark. 309, 607 S.W.3d 491. … Green v. State, 2013 Ark. 497, 430 S.W.3d 729.

Judicial Discipline & Disability Commission v. Thompson

341 Ark. 253 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · May 10, 2000

In Undem v. … See Western Foods, Inc. v. Weiss, 338 Ark. 140 , 992 S.W.2d 100 (1999); Brown v. Arkansas State (HFACR) Licensing Bd., 336 Ark. 34 , 984 S.W.2d 402 (1999).

Palmer v. State

213 Ark. 956 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 18, 1948

Supreme Court in the case of Ashcraft v. Tennessee, 4 Malinski v. New York, 5 and Haley v. Ohio. 6 In the case of State v. Browning, 206 Ark. 791 , 178 S. … Tennessee.” 8 This statement of counsel is bottomed on a thorough familiarity with the earlier cases of Brown v. Mississippi, 9 Chambers v. Florida, 10 McNabb v. U. S., 11 and Anderson v. U.

Dortch v. Robinson

31 Ark. 296 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 15, 1876

Brown. … Bradley v. Hume, 18 Ark., 284; Frank et al v. Hedrick, ib. 304.

Evans v. Blytheville, Leachville & Arkansas Southern Railroad

147 Ark. 28 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jan 10, 1921

Railway Co. v. Triplett, 54 Ark. 300 . … Briney, 58 Ark. 214 ; Railway Co. v. Triplett, supra; Bain v. Northern Pac. Ry. Co., 98 N. W. 244 ; International & G. N. R. Co. v. Hinzie, 18 S. W. 683 ; Smith v. Atlanta, etc., R. Co., 44 S. E. 664 ; Fort Smith Lbr.

Milner v. New Edinburg School District

211 Ark. 337 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Mar 24, 1947

W. 2d 353 ; Williams v. Kirby School District, 207 Ark. 458 , 181 S. W. 2d 488 ; Rose v. Marshall School District, 210 Ark. 211 , 195 S. W. 2d 49 ; Vandale Special School District v. Feltner, 210 Ark. 743 , 197 S. … Brown, who was to raze it, and remove the materials. Brown agreed to pay the district $1,500 for the materials. C. When J. H.

Bailey v. Rose Care Center

307 Ark. 14 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 21, 1991

Prater v. St. Paul Ins. Co., 293 Ark. 547 , 739 S.W.2d 676 (1987). Two prior opinions by this court, Sexton v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co., 275 Ark. 361 , 631 S.W.2d 270 (1982), and Brown v. St. Paul Mercury Ins. … To the extent that our opinion in Brown v. St. Paul Mercury Ins. Co., 292 Ark. 558 , 732 S.W.2d 130 is inconsistent with this holding, it is overruled.

Burleson v. McDermott

57 Ark. 229 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 4, 1893

Murray v. Ballou, 1 Johns. Ch. 566 ; Hayden v. Bucklin, 9 Paige, 512 . … Whiting v. Beebe, 12 Ark. 564 , 566; Montgomery v. Birge, 31 Ark. 491 ; Hale v. Warner, 36 Ark. 217 . 2. purchas. suit bouifcfby dfiCl"66.

Anderson v. State

210 Ark. 548 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 28, 1946

Bowser v. State, 194 Ark. 182 , 106 S. W. 2d 176 ; Morris v. State, 197 Ark. 778 , 126 S. W. 2d 93 ; Woodall v. State, 200 Ark. 665 , 140 S. W. 2d 424 ; Davis v. State, 202 Ark. 948 , 154 S. W. 2d 812 ; Krokrich v. … In Green v. State, 169 Ark. 330 , 275 S.

Red Bud Realty Co. v. South

153 Ark. 380 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · May 1, 1922

J. 416, 434 et seq. to 440 inclusive; Stewart v. Smith, 91 Pa. 667 ; Brown v. Guaranty & Trust Co., 128 U. S. 403 ; Horner-Gaylord Co. v. Miller & Bennett, 147 Fed. 295 ; Venner v. Great Northern Ry. Co., 136 N. … Such an action cannot ordinarily be maintained except by the corporation itself in an action authorized by its board of directors. Holmes v. Jewett, 134 Pac. 665 ; Dumpfel v. O. & M. R. Co., 110 U. S. 209 ; Smith v.

City of Bentonville v. Browne

108 Ark. 306 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · May 19, 1913

Browne v. Bentonville, 94 Ark. 80 . … Browne v. Bentonville, 94 Ark. 80 . The decree of the court is therefore reversed and this supplemental complaint is dismissed.