Case law

Little Rock Land Company v. Raper

245 Ark. 641 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 18, 1968

Co. v. Simpson, 87 Ark. 335 , 112 S. W. 875 . One boarding or alighting from a train has been held to be a passenger. Hot Springs St. Ry. Co. v. Jones, 234 Ark. 693 , 354 SW. 2d 278 ; Huckaby v. St. Louis I. M. & S. Ry. … See, also, Great American Indemnity Co. v. Deatherage, 175 Okla. 28 , 52 P. 2d 827 (1936); Brown v. George Pepperdine Foundation, 23 Cal. 2d 256 , 143 P. 2d 929 (1933); Northcross v. Theatre Co. & Const. Co., 3 Tenn.

Spence v. State

184 Ark. 139 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jul 13, 1931

Bolling v. State, 54 Ark. 588 , 16 S. W. 658 ; Shaeffer v. State, 61 Ark. 241 , 32 S. W. 679 ; Green v. State, 64 Ark. 523 , 43 S. W. 973 ; Byrd v. State, 76 Ark. 286 , 88 S. W. 974 ; Schuman v. … In State v.

City of Fort Smith v. Wade

578 S.W.3d 276 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jun 20, 2019

See Harris v. … Furthermore, in Harris v.

State Use Randolph County v. Pocahontas State Bank

184 Ark. 442 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 19, 1931

Brown and others as sureties thereon. … Rhodes, 230 Pa. 397 , 79 A. 634 ; Board of Commrs. v. Citizens’ Bank, 67 Minn. 236 , 69 N. W. 912 ; State v. U. S. F. & G. Co., 81 Kan. 660 , 106 p. 1040, 26 L. R. A. (N. S.) 865.” See also First National Bank v.

Monsanto Company v. Arkansas State Plant Board; And Arkansas State Plant Board Members in Their Official Capacities: Walter "Bruce" Alford; Kyle Baltz; Russellblack; Russell Bragg; Robert Campbell; Marty Eaton; John Fricke; Terry Fuller; Greg Hay; Jerry Hyde; Brad Koen; Matthew Marsh; Mark Morgan; Dennie Stokes; Sam Stuckey; Barry Walls; And Dr. Ken North

622 S.W.3d 166 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · May 6, 2021

McGhee v. Ark. … Martin v. Kohls, 2014 Ark. 427, at 8, 444 S.W.3d 844, 849; see also Jegley v.

Worsham v. Bassett

489 S.W.3d 162 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Apr 7, 2016

See Blake v. Shellstrom, 2012 Ark. 428, 424 S.W.3d 830. We turn to Worsham’s appeal from the Board’s decision. … See Mountain Pure, LLC v. Little Rock Wastewater Util., 2011 Ark. 258, 383 S.W.3d 347; Nelson v. Dir., Dep’t of Workforce Servs., 2013 Ark. App. 533.

Walker v. State

318 Ark. 107 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 3, 1994

See, e.g., Brown v. State, 316 Ark. 724 , 875 S.W.2d 828 (1994); Brown v. State, 315 Ark. 466 , 869 S.W.2d 9 (1994); Hickson v. State, 312 Ark. 171 , 847 S.W.2d 691 (1993); Middleton v. … State, 311 Ark. 307 , 842 S.W.2d 434 (1992); Pilcher v. State, 303 Ark. 335 , 796 S.W.2d 845 (1990); Taylor v. State, 299 Ark. 123 , 771 S.W.2d 742 (1989).

Biedenharn v. Hogue

338 Ark. 660 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 7, 1999

Quoting from Gantt v. Ark. … Brown, Imber, and Smith, JJ., dissent. The current situation should not be confused with the one presented in Massongill v. County of Scott, 337 Ark. 281 , 991 S.W.2d 105 (1999).

Terry v. Drainage District No. 6, Miller County

206 Ark. 940 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 29, 1943

Bradbury v. Dumond, supra. Effect of the two-year statute can only be avoided by overruling many cases, beginning with City of Fort Smith v. McKibbin, 41 Ark. 45 . See Board of Levee Inspectors of Chicot County v. … Brown, 129 Ark. 270 , 195 S.W. 673 ; Halliburton v. Brinkley, 135 Ark. 592 , 204 S.W. 213 ; Norwood v. Mayo, 153 Ark. 620 , 241 S.W. 7 ; Champion v. Williams, 165 Ark. 328 , 264 S.W. 972 ; Hutton v.

Mason v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

333 Ark. 3 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Apr 30, 1998

See Brown v. Tucker, 330 Ark. 435 , 954 S.W.2d 262 (1997); Cross v. Arkansas Livestock & Poultry Comm'n, 328 Ark. 255 , 943 S.W.2d 230 (1997); Belin v. West, 315 Ark. 61 , 864 S.W.2d 838 (1993); Nicholson v. … Simmons First Nat'l Corp., 312 Ark. 291 , 849 S.W.2d 483 (1993) (Holt, C.J., Newbern and Brown, JJ., dissenting opinion); W.E. Long Co. v.

Conte v. State

463 S.W.3d 686 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · May 21, 2015

Laswell v. State, 2012 Ark. 201 , 404 S.W.3d 818 . In Zinger v. … See Camargo v.

Brockwell v. State

260 Ark. 807 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Dec 20, 1976

Brown v. State, supra; Carpenter v. State, supra; Maples v. State, supra. … Brown v. State, supra. Hall v. State, supra.

McCutchen v. City of Fort Smith

425 S.W.3d 671 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Dec 6, 2012

In Arkansas Gazette v. … Gas Corp. v.

St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad v. Budd

112 Ark. 105 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Mar 16, 1914

In Newhall v. Sanger, 92 U. … Co. v. Whitney, 132 U.

Muskogee Bridge Co., Inc. v. Stansell

311 Ark. 113 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 16, 1992

Brown, Justice. … Derrick v. Mexico Chiquito, Inc., supra; Love v. H. F. Construction Co., 261 Ark. 831 , 552 S.W.2d 15 (1977).

Boland v. Stanley

88 Ark. 562 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jan 4, 1909

See Burnett v. Burkhead, 21 Ark. 77 ; Trumbull v. Trumbull, 98 N. W. 683 ; Payne v. Williams, 4 Bax. (Tenn.), 585, and other cases cited in Tiffany’s Persons & Domestic Rel., p. 77, note 116; Brown v. Brown, 124 N. … Brown v. Brown, supra; Tiffany’s Persons & Dom. Rel. 70.

Woodard v. State

273 Ark. 235 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jun 29, 1981

Although petitioner relies on Dunaway, which was decided about the time certiorari was denied in petitioner’s case, the Dunaway case was bottomed squarely upon the case of Brown v. Illinois, 422 U.S. 590 (1975). … It may be true that Dunaway v. New York, supra, had not been decided at that time but certainly Brown v. Illinois, supra, and Wong Sun v. United States, 371 U.S. 471 (1963), had been decided.

Dixon v. State

260 Ark. 857 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jan 10, 1977

If the State were contending that Dixon was an accomplice, under the circumstances, in the delivery of the brown sugar, its contention might be supported by our holding in Hartman v. … Clark v. State, 246 Ark. 876 , 440 S.W. 2d 205 (1969). We pointed out in Bailey v.

Land v. Arkansas Department of Health

282 Ark. 191 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Apr 9, 1984

Appellants were then granted a hearing before the Arkansas State Board of Health. … The Board approved the alternate plan. Appellants then sought a writ of certiorari in circuit court.

C. & A. Construction Co. v. Benning Construction Co.

256 Ark. 621 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · May 20, 1974

Miller v. Dyer, 243 Ark. 981 , 423 S.W. 2d 275 (1968). However, where the meaning of a written contract is ambiguous, parol evidence is admissible to explain the writing, Brown and Hackney v. … Fort Smith Appliance and Service Co. v. Smith, 218 Ark. 411 , 236 S.W. 2d 583 (1951); Brown and Hackney v. Daubs, supra; and Easton v.