Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersark

10,000+ results

1.28s

  • Cole, Jones, and Bean v. State

    211 Ark. 836 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jun 9, 1947

    In Smith and Brown v. State, 207 Ark. 104 , 179 S. W. 2d 185 , it was said that the Act was not open to constitutional objections. … In Gurein v. State, 209 Ark. 1082 , 193 S. W. 2d 997 , the provisions of the Act formerly dealt with were treated as constitutional upon authority of the Smith-Brown case.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Salmon v. Atkinson

    355 Ark. 325 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Dec 11, 2003

    See, e.g., Crockett & Brown, P.A. v. Courson, 312 Ark. 363 , 849 S.W.2d 938 (1993); Lancaster v. Fitzhugh, 310 Ark. 590 , 839 S.W.2d 192 (1992); Lockley v. … Crockett & Brown, P.A. v. Courson, 312 Ark. 363 , 377-A, 849 S.W.2d 938, 946 (1993) (supplemental opinion denying rehearing). See abo McDermott v. McDermott, 336 Ark. 557 , 986 S.W.2d 843 (1999); Finnegan v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Davis v. State

    320 Ark. 329 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Apr 10, 1995

    See also Penn v. State, 319 Ark. 739 , 894 S.W.2d 597 (1995); Brooks v. State, 308 Ark. 660 , 827 S.W.2d 119 (1992); Ferrell v. State, 305 Ark. 511 , 810 S.W.2d 29 (1991). … See Crawford v. State, 309 Ark. 54 , 827 S.W.2d 134 (1992); Rudd v. State, 308 Ark. 401 , 825 S.W.2d 565 (1992), citing LaFave and Israel, 3 Criminal Procedure, § 23.6(a) (1984).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Little Rock Newspapers, Inc. v. Fitzhugh

    330 Ark. 561 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 13, 1997

    In Brown v. Tallahassee Democrat, Inc., 440 So. 2d 588 (Fla. … Brown and Imber, JJ., not participating.

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Newman v. State

    380 S.W.3d 395 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Mar 17, 2011

    See T.C. v. State, 2010 Ark. 240 , 364 S.W.3d 53 . … Brown testified that she then called Bobbi Richmond, the owner of the daycare, who praised Newman. Ms. Brown testified that Ms.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Arkansas Department of Health v. Westark Christian Action Council

    322 Ark. 440 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Nov 13, 1995

    Brown, Justice. … (b) The board may authorize by regulation the disclosure of information contained in vital records for research purposes.

    Cited 26 timesPublished
  • Wilkerson v. Mobley

    152 Ark. 124 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 20, 1922

    Bickham v. Kosminsky, 74 Ark. 413 . … It was then agreed that the execution should not be levied on the property of Brown, but that Brown would be given until the 15th of February, 1921, before an execution should be levied upon his property.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Stevenson v. Christie

    64 Ark. 72 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Apr 24, 1897

    United States v. Arredondo, 6 Peters, 709 ; Brown, Jurisdiction, § 1, pp. 2 and 3. “There are three indispensable requisites touching the exercise of jurisdiction that must always exist. … Brown, Jurisdiction .§ l,pp. 3, 4 and cases, note 1. “Jurisdiction over the subject-matter is the right of the court to exercise judicial power over that class of cases.” Brown, Jurisdiction, § la, p. 4.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Health Facilities Management Corp. v. Hughes

    365 Ark. 237 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 9, 2006

    Brown, Justice. … In Advocat, Inc. v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Texas Company v. Williams

    178 Ark. 1110 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Feb 4, 1929

    Brown, R. E. Wood.” … Co. v. Brown, 73 Ark. 42 , 83 S. W. 332 ; Bearden v. St. L. I. M. & S. R. Co., 103 Ark. 341 , 146 S. W. 84 ; or St. L. I. M. & S. R. Co. v. Reilly, 110 Ark. 182 , 161 S.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • STATE DEPT. OF FIN. AND ADMIN. v. Staton

    325 Ark. 341 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 28, 1996

    Board of Directors, 172 Ark. 414 , 288 S.W. 910 (1926), but that exception is not applicable to the case at bar. The reasoning underlying our cases is sound. … See State v. Staton, 325 Ark. 341 , 925 S.W.2d 418 (1996). Affirmed in part and reversed and remanded in part for proceedings consistent with this opinion. Newbern, Corbin, and Brown, JJ., dissent.

    Cited 19 timesPublished
  • Beaver v. John Q. Hammons Hotels, L.P.

    355 Ark. 359 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Dec 11, 2003

    The trial court’s reliance on Brown v. Dow Chemical was misplaced, however, because while that case involved a similar situation, it is distinguishable from the case at bar. In Brown v. … The trial court’s decision rested entirely on the case of Brown v. Dow Chemical Co., supra.

    Cited 19 timesPublished
  • Pryor v. Lowe

    258 Ark. 188 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · May 27, 1975

    Butler v. Board of Directors of Fourche Drainage District, 99 Ark. 100 , 137 S.W. 251 ; Webb v. State, 176 Ark. 722 , 3 S.W. 2d 1000 . … Justice Brown joins in this opinion. J. Fred Jones, Justice. I agree with the majority opinion that Act 16 of 1975 is unconstitutional and has no salvage value through severability.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Walker v. State

    280 Ark. 17 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jul 5, 1983

    BROWN: That’s fine with me. Go ahead. MR. … Robinson v. State, 256 Ark. 675 , 509 S.W.2d 808 (1974). Although the record reflects that a subpoena was served on the witness, Ark. Stat.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Casteel v. McCuen

    310 Ark. 568 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 9, 1992

    the respective boards can place this issue on the November 3, 1992 General Election ballot. … Czech, City Clerk v. Munson, Chancellor, 280 Ark. 219 , 656 S.W.2d 696 (1983); Dixon v. Hall, Secretary of State, 210 Ark. 891 , 198 S.W.2d 1002 (1946).

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Kay v. Kay

    306 Ark. 322 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jul 15, 1991

    In Coleman v. … Co. v.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Mortensen v. Ballard

    218 Ark. 459 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Mar 5, 1951

    See McGaughey v. Brown, 46 Ark. 25 ; Leach v. Moore, 57 Ark. 583 , 22 S. W. 173 ; and Sprigg v. Wilmans, 204 Ark. 863 , 165 S. W. 2d 69 . In 34 Am. … Mortensen based his claim on a resolution purportedly adopted on August 12, 1929, at a meeting of the Board of Directors of the corporation.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. Love

    74 Ark. 528 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Mar 18, 1905

    Co. v. … Martin v. Wakefield, 42 Minn. 176 ; Hale v. Brown, 59 N. H. 551” In Choctaw & Memphis Ry. Co. v.

    Cited 20 timesPublished
  • Bank of Corning v. Nimnich

    122 Ark. 316 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jan 31, 1916

    Co., Per Henry Brown, .Sec. & Treas. Henry Brown, Director. W. T. Griffith, Director. •Earnest Hartwig, Director. Porter Larkins, Director. G. A. Hoffman, Director. J. T. Montgomery, Director. H. D. 'Chappell, Director. … A. 496; Castle v. Belfast Foundry Co., 72 Me. 167 ; Draper v. Massachusetts Steam Heating Co., 5 Allen (Mass.) 338; Reeve v. First National Bank of Glassboro, 54 N. J. L. 208, 16 L. R. A. 143; Miller v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Warren, Administratrix v. Hale

    203 Ark. 608 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jan 26, 1942

    Co. v. Davenport, 80 Ark. 244 , 96 S. … See, also, Mississippi River Fuel Corp. v. Young, 188 Ark. 575 , 67 S. W. 2d 581 . In Dishman v. Whitney, et al., 121 Wash. 157 , 209 Pac. 12 , 29 A. L.

    Cited 7 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.