Case law

Haley v. Hall

733 F. Supp. 1275 · District Court, E.D. Arkansas · Apr 3, 1990

Massachusetts Board of Retirement v. Murgia, 427 U.S. 307, 312 , 96 S.Ct. 2562, 2566 , 49 L.Ed.2d 520 (1976). … Massachusetts v. Feeney, 442 U.S. 256 , 99 S.Ct. 2282 , 60 L.Ed.2d 870 (1979).

Associated Milk Producers, Inc. v. Parr

528 F. Supp. 7 · District Court, E.D. Arkansas · Feb 1, 1979

The parties agree that the defendant is entitled to indemnity for fees and expenses incurred in the defense of a civil action styled Van Huss v. Committee to Re-elect the President, Parr, et al., No. … Nelson, by other employees of AMPI, and by at least some members of the Board of Directors. The verdict of the jury in favor of Mr.

Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. Arkansas Public Service Commission

584 F. Supp. 1087 · District Court, E.D. Arkansas · Mar 30, 1984

FTC v. Standard Oil Co. of Cal., 449 U.S. 232 , 101 S.Ct. 488 , 68 L.Ed.2d 416 (1980); Darr v. Carter, 640 F.2d 163 (8th Cir.1981). The balancing test for an exception to this requirement is discussed in West v. … V.

Hall v. Lowery

545 F. Supp. 1152 · District Court, E.D. Arkansas · Aug 25, 1982

During the same session, the Legislature also enacted Act 265 of 1981, creating a Judicial Reapportionment Board, and directing that the Board report to the General Assembly, using the new uniform system of case accounting … Texas Department of Community Affairs v. Burdine, 450 U.S. 248 , 101 S.Ct. 1089 , 67 L.Ed.2d 207 (1981).

Pickens v. Tucker

851 F. Supp. 363 · District Court, E.D. Arkansas · May 4, 1994

The Nebraska Board of Pardons was created by statute in 1969. [Neb.Rev.Stat. § 83-1,127 (Reissue 1987).] It is composed of the Governor, Secretary of State, and Attorney General. … His due process argument is vitiated by the Connecticut Board of Pardons v.

Little Rock School District v. Pulaski County Special School District No. 1

660 F. Supp. 637 · District Court, E.D. Arkansas · May 13, 1987

V. THE NEW POLICY OF THE LRSD BOARD LRSD went forward with making the massive teacher reassignments made on April 10, 1987. … See also, Cousin v. Board of Trustees of Houston Municipal Separate School, 726 F.2d 262, 265-66 (5th Cir.1984); and Lujan v. Franklin County Board of Education, 766 F.2d 917, 924 (6th Cir.1985). VII.

Blanks v. Waste Management of Arkansas, Inc.

31 F. Supp. 2d 673 · District Court, E.D. Arkansas · Apr 8, 1998

Richmond v. Board of Regents of Univ. of Minn., 957 F.2d 595 , 598 (8th Cir.1992); Herrero v. St. Louis University Hospital, 109 F.3d 481, 483-84 (8th Cir.1997) (same). … Wolff v. Brown, 128 F.3d 682 , 685 (8th Cir.1997). See also Majahad v. Reich, 915 F.Supp. 499 , 502 n. 3 (D.Mass.1996). The statements that plaintiffs assert are hearsay are not hearsay.

Hopkins v. Jegley

267 F. Supp. 3d 1024 · District Court, E.D. Arkansas · Jul 28, 2017

Weiss, M.D., are members of the Arkansas State Medical Board. The State Medical Board is responsible for licensing medical professionals under Arkansas law. Ark. Code Ann. § 17-95-410 . … Hazelrigg v. Board of Penitentiary Commissioners, 184 Ark. 154 , 40 S.W.2d *1072 998 (1931).

Tapley v. United States

636 F. Supp. 85 · District Court, E.D. Arkansas · Feb 20, 1986

Beevers v. Miller, 242 Ark. 541 , 414 S.W.2d 603 (1967). See, Woods, Comparative Fault, § 13.4 (1978). 5. … He is not board certified in any field of medicine and has no association with any hospital.

Missouri Pacific Railroad v. Tax Division

504 F. Supp. 907 · District Court, E.D. Arkansas · Dec 3, 1980

Arkansas Public Service Commission v. Pulaski County Board of Equalization, 266 Ark. 64 , 582 S.W.2d 942 (1979). … Ariz.1979); Ogilvie v. The State Board of Equalization of the State of North Dakota, 492 F.Supp. 446 (D.N.D. 1980) ; Louisville & Nashville Railroad Co. v. Louisiana Tax Comm., 498 F.Supp. 418 (M.D.

Arkansas State Highway Employees Local 1315 v. Smith

459 F. Supp. 452 · District Court, E.D. Arkansas · Jan 23, 1978

Ass’n v. Board of Ed., Portland, Ark. Sch. Dist., 446 F.2d 763, 766 (8th Cir. 1971); United Federation of Postal Clerks, AFL-CIO v. … Watson, 409 F.2d 462, 469-470 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 902 , 90 S.Ct. 212 , 24 L.Ed.2d 178 (1969); Smith v. Board of Education of Morrilton Sch. Dist. No. 32, 365 F.2d 770, 776-778 (8th Cir. 1966).

Smith v. Climer

341 F. Supp. 123 · District Court, E.D. Arkansas · Apr 10, 1972

Hadnott, 405 U.S. 1035 , 92 S.Ct. 1304 , 31 L.Ed.2d 576 ; Virginia State Board of Elections v. Bufford, 405 U.S. 1035 , 92 S.Ct. 1304 , 31 L.Ed.2d 576 ; Donovan v. … Board of Election Comrs. of City of Chicago, 405 U.S. 1036 , 92 S.Ct. 1305 , 31 L.Ed.2d 575 ; Cody v. Andrews, 405 U.S. 1034 , 92 S.Ct. 1306 , 31 L.Ed.2d 576 . See 40 L.W. 3479.

Federal Land Bank of St. Louis v. Hopmann

658 F. Supp. 92 · District Court, E.D. Arkansas · Mar 19, 1987

According to 12 C.F.R. § 614.4280 , the bank board sets the rates of interest. See also, 12 U.S.C. §§ 2015 and 2205. … See Hartman v. v. Farmers Production Credit Association, 628 F.Supp. 218 (S.D.Ind.1983).

Wyatt v. Federal Sav. and Loan Ins. Corp.

685 F. Supp. 196 · District Court, E.D. Arkansas · Mar 31, 1988

At that time the Bank Board also directed the Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation, in its corporate capacity (FSLIC-Corporate), to make payment on each insured account at First South. … Roy Bryant Battle Co. v. U.S., 463 F.2d 418 (5th Cir.1972).

Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. Manatt

688 F. Supp. 1327 · District Court, E.D. Arkansas · May 25, 1988

See FDIC v. Gardner, 606 F.Supp. 1484, 1488 (S.D.Miss.1985) (reference to the agreement must be specifically reflected in the minutes of the board or committee). … FDIC v. Wood, supra.

Grace v. MacArthur

170 F. Supp. 442 · District Court, E.D. Arkansas · Feb 16, 1959

Causby v. … Nebraska Board of Equalization and Assessment, supra.

Hughes v. Haynes

District Court, E.D. Arkansas · Jun 3, 2025

P. 56(a); Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 322-23 (1986); Anderson v. Liberty Lobby Inc., 477 U.S. 242, 249-50 (1986). … P. 56(c); Torgerson v. City of Rochester, 643 F.3d 1031, 1042 (8th Cir. 2011). Mr.

Dodd v. Martin

15 F. 338 · District Court, E.D. Arkansas · Oct 15, 1882

Barkman v. Simmons, 23 Ark. 1 ; Moir v. Brown, 14 Barb. 39 . This being so, it results that the deed of assignment, at the time of its execution and delivery, conveyed only a part of the assignor’s property. … The supreme court of this state, in Clayton v.

Lloyd v. American Airlines, Inc.

118 F. Supp. 2d 916 · District Court, E.D. Arkansas · Oct 27, 2000

In Eastern Airlines, Inc. v. … Likewise, in Jack v.

Filbert v. Arkansas & Missouri Highway Dist.

2 F.2d 114 · District Court, E.D. Arkansas · Oct 23, 1924

Marsh v. Fulton County, 10 Wall. (77 U. S.) 676, 684, 19 L. Ed. 1040 ; Kelley v. Milan. 127 U. S. 139, 159 , 8 S. Ct. 1101 , 32 L. Ed. 77 ; Forbes Boat Line v. Board of Commissioners, 258 U. S. 338 , 42 S. … In Thibault v.