Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
1,831 results
4.95s
323 F. Supp. 728 · District Court, E.D. Arkansas · Jan 28, 1971
See Monroe v. Pape, 365 U.S. 167 , 81 S.Ct. 473 , 5 L.Ed.2d 492 (1961); McNeese v. Board of Education, 373 U.S. 668 , 83 S.Ct. 1433 , 10 L.Ed.2d 622 (1963); Richards v. … Apparently Brown was sent home and got a haircut. The principal, Mr.
Cited 8 timesPublishedBrown v. Penske Truck Leasing Co LP
District Court, E.D. Arkansas · Sep 29, 2023
(cleaned up). 96 Grey v. City of Oak Grove, Mo., 396 F.3d 1031, 1034 (8th Cir. 2005). 97 Anderson v. … See also John v.
Cited 0 timesUnknown709 F. Supp. 902 · District Court, E.D. Arkansas · Mar 31, 1989
VI, clauses 2, 3, there is no reason to prolong this litigation. 1 Amendment 44 *904 was the product of the demagoguery that followed the Supreme Court’s decision in Brown v. … In Ableman v.
Cited 2 timesPublished156 F. Supp. 220 · District Court, E.D. Arkansas · Sep 21, 1957
On May 20, 1954 (three days after the Supreme Court’s first decision in the public school segregation cases, Brown v. … This plan is set forth verbatim in this Court’s opinion entered in this case on August 27, 1956 (Aaron v.
Cited 13 timesPublishedRobinson v. Arkansas Parole Board
District Court, E.D. Arkansas · Mar 16, 2022
asserts that the Arkansas Parole Board incorrectly made him serve five additional months of parole.1 A district court has the authority to dismiss a case sua sponte for failure to state a claim.2 “The Arkansas Parole Board … See Anton v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · Oct 20, 2025
Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009); Reynolds v. Dormire, 636 F.3d 976, 979 (8th Cir. 2011). 2 Brown writes Nurse Owens’s name as “Nurse Handy.” (Doc. 2 at 4). … See Howlett v. Rose, 496 U.S. 356, 365 (1990); McDowell v. Dawson, 221 Fed. Appx. 497, 498 (8th Cir. 2007) (unpublished) (Missouri Department of Corrections was not “person” under § 1983); Brown v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · Jul 2, 2026
PLAINTIFF V. … Jones v. Bock, 549 U.S. 199, 218 (2007). B.
Cited 0 timesUnknown730 F. Supp. 196 · District Court, E.D. Arkansas · Jan 26, 1990
The Board’s members in 1981 were Governor Frank White, Secretary of State Paul Riviere, and Attorney General Clark. The plan presently in effect (except as modified as to Crittenden County by Smith v. … State Representatives Irma Hunter Brown and Grover Richardson, who in 1981 were two of the three black members serving in House district 62-64, both told the State Board of Apportionment that they preferred the existing multi-member
Cited 57 timesPublishedWright v. Whitehall School District
92 F.R.D. 80 · District Court, E.D. Arkansas · Nov 9, 1981
In Foster v. … In Martin v.
Cited 3 timesPublishedLittle Rock School District v. Pulaski County Special School District No. 1
726 F. Supp. 1544 · District Court, E.D. Arkansas · Dec 11, 1989
The initial reaction of the school board of the Little Rock School District Board of Education to the landmark case, Brown v. Board of Education 347 U.S. 483 , 74 S.Ct. 686 , 98 L.Ed. 873 (1954), was one of reason. … Armstrong v. Board of Education, 616 F.2d 305, 321-322 .
Cited 8 timesPublishedDreyfus Co., Inc. v. Royster Co.
487 F. Supp. 531 · District Court, E.D. Arkansas · Apr 1, 1980
Corp. v. … Stressing the plaintiff’s purchase of merchandise from defendant over a long period of time, Judge Henley found that defendant was “transacting business” in this state.); Brown v. Buckingham Mfg. Co., No.
Cited 5 timesPublishedDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · Apr 1, 2026
The licensing board placed Brown on probation for one year as a result of the ethics complaint. … Further, the Licensing Board placed Brown on probation for one year as a result of the ethics complaint.
Cited 0 timesUnknownJackson v. First Federal Sav. of Arkansas, FA
709 F. Supp. 887 · District Court, E.D. Arkansas · Jan 13, 1989
The decision which lays the foundation for resolution of this question is Chrysler Corp. v. Brown, 441 U.S. 281 , 99 S.Ct. 1705 , 60 L.Ed.2d 208 (1979), the case which brought Section 1905 “out of the closet.” … See Federal Home Loan Bank Board v. Superior Court of the State of Arizona, 494 *894 F.Supp. 924, 927 (D.Ariz.1980); Colonial Savings and Loan Association v. St.
Cited 1 timesPublished472 F. Supp. 1056 · District Court, E.D. Arkansas · Jun 13, 1979
Davis v. Board of Trustees, 270 F.Supp. 528 (W.D.Ark.1967), aff’d 396 F.2d 730 (8th Cir.), cert. denied 393 U.S. 962 , 89 S.Ct. 401 , 21 L.Ed.2d 375 (1968). … Counsel for plaintiffs having prevailed in this action are entitled to a reasonable attorneys’ fee based upon the criteria set forth in Brown v. Bathke, 588 F.2d 634 (8th Cir. 1978).
Cited 7 timesPublishedGovernment Employees Insurance v. Bates
414 F. Supp. 658 · District Court, E.D. Arkansas · Jun 25, 1975
A full exposition of the construction of the Act is set forth in United States v. Moore, 469 F.2d 788 (3rd Cir., 1972), cert. den. 411 U.S. 905 , 93 S.Ct. 1528 , 36 L.Ed.2d 195 .
Cited 5 timesPublishedBrown v. Robinson Nursing and Rehabilitation Center LLC
District Court, E.D. Arkansas · Apr 17, 2023
PLAINTIFF V. … McKnight v. Johnson Controls, Inc., 36 F.3d 1396, 1400 (8th Cir. 1994).
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · Apr 20, 2026
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS NORTHERN DIVISION SONYA BROWN PLAINTIFF Vv. … § 405(¢); Melkonyan v. Sullivan, 501 U.S. 89, 98, 101-02 (1991). D.P. Marshall Jr.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · Jun 16, 2026
Brown’s motion, Doc. 19, is therefore granted. … . § 2412(d); Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586, 591 (2010). The check must be made payable to Brown. And it should be mailed to Brown’s lawyer. So Ordered. D.P.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · Jun 2, 2026
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS NORTHERN DIVISION SONYA BROWN PLAINTIFF Vv. … But Brown hasn’t submitted an itemized bill from her lawyer for the Court to review. That's required. 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)(1)(B); Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586, 594 (2010).
Cited 0 timesUnknownNewton County Wildlife Ass'n v. Rogers
948 F. Supp. 50 · District Court, E.D. Arkansas · Aug 13, 1996
In Maxey , the court found that the plaintiff had fallen short of the necessary showing although he presented evidence that there was short notice by the Board, uncertainty as to whether one Board member had enough knowledge … Environmental Coalition of Ojai v. Brown, 72 F.3d 1411, 1414 (9th Cir.1995). Substantive decisions should be reviewed under the arbitrary and capricious standard. Id. In County of Suffolk v.
Cited 5 timesPublished
Ask Donna