Case law

Williams v. Alabama State University

865 F. Supp. 789 · District Court, M.D. Alabama · Oct 12, 1994

See, e.g., Harden v. Adams, 760 F.2d 1158, 1163-64 (11th Cir.1985) (Eleventh Amendment bars suit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against Troy State University’s Board of Trustees); Davis v. … Brown v. Frey, 889 F.2d 159, 170 (8th Cir.1989), ce rt. denied, 493 U.S. 1088 , 110 S.Ct. 1156 , 107 L.Ed.2d 1059 (1990) (citations omitted) (internal quotation marks omitted).

United States v. Two Parcels of Real Property Located in Russell County

868 F. Supp. 306 · District Court, M.D. Alabama · Aug 17, 1994

United States v. … United States v. A Single Family Residence, 803 F.2d 625 , 629 n. 4 (11th Cir.1986); see Baxter v.

Treadwell v. Dow-United Technologies

970 F. Supp. 962 · District Court, M.D. Alabama · Mar 12, 1997

See Polston v. Boomershine Pontiac-GMC Truck, Inc., 952 F.2d 1304, 1309 (11th Cir.1992). In his affidavit, Brown describes his credentials as well as plaintiffs course of treatment. … But see Robinson v.

Dillard v. Crenshaw County

640 F. Supp. 1347 · District Court, M.D. Alabama · May 28, 1986

Alabama Mental Health Board, 297 F.Supp. 291 (M.D. Ala.1969) (three-judge court) (state mental health board discriminated against black employees), cultural opportunities, Cobb v. … Dec. 22, 1971), and Brown v. Gallion, No. 69-697-E (N.D. Ala. Feb. 18, 1970), respectively.

Belk-Avery, Inc. v. Henry I. Siegel Co., Inc.

457 F. Supp. 1330 · District Court, M.D. Alabama · Oct 10, 1978

Finally he discussed the Brown Bag with another H.I.S. customer in Gadsden. These facts superficially resemble those in Girardi v. Gates Rubber Co. … The Fifth Circuit in Lehrman v.

Leonard v. Rumsfeld

146 F. Supp. 2d 1227 · District Court, M.D. Alabama · Jun 6, 2001

In Brown v. … See also Canino v. EEOC, 707 F.2d 468 , 472 (11th Cir.1983) (Brown holding extends to claims of retaliation) (citing Porter v. Adams, 639 F.2d 273, 278 (5th Cir.1981)); Newbold v.

United States v. City of Montgomery

201 F. Supp. 590 · District Court, M.D. Alabama · Jan 2, 1962

Baldwin v. Morgan, 5 Cir., 287 F.2d 750 ; Lewis et al. v. Greyhound Corporation et al., supra. … Rule 52(a) Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; Thomas v. Peyser, 73 App.D.C. 155 , 118 F.2d 369 ; Lindsey v.

Jones v. Hamic

875 F. Supp. 2d 1334 · District Court, M.D. Alabama · Jul 13, 2012

Maniccia v. Brown, 171 F.3d 1364, 1368 (11th Cir.1999) (citing Kremer v. Chem. Constr. Corp., 456 U.S. 461, 482 , 102 S.Ct. 1883 , 72 L.Ed.2d 262 (1982)); see also Ross v. … Barnes v.

James v. Three Notch Medical Center

966 F. Supp. 1112 · District Court, M.D. Alabama · Jun 5, 1997

Mounger, 541 So.2d 463 (Ala.1989), who represents the statutory distributees, Board of Trustees Univ. of Ala. v. … Brown, 541 So.2d 463, 463 (Ala.1989) (citing Holt v. Stollenwerck, 174 Ala. 213 , 56 So. 912 (1911)).

Yelverton v. Vargo

386 F. Supp. 2d 1224 · District Court, M.D. Alabama · Sep 7, 2005

In Vinyard, v. … See Troupe v.

Gilley v. Alabama Board of Pardons & Paroles (INMATE 2)

District Court, M.D. Alabama · Jul 24, 2019

He brings this pro se 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action against the Alabama Board of Pardons and Paroles and parole board members Cliff Walker and Eddie Cook, Jr. … Holland v. Florida, 560 U.S. 631, 649 (2010); Sandvik v.

TAKAYSIA COLLINS v. STATE OF ALABAMA BOARD OF PARDONS AND PAROLES

District Court, M.D. Alabama · Aug 31, 2026

The Board relies on McCullough v. … The Board’s Motion to Dismiss (doc. 19) is GRANTED as to Counts I, III, and V. Those claims are DISMISSED without prejudice.

Reynolds v. Gallion ex rel. Attorney General of Alabama

308 F. Supp. 803 · District Court, M.D. Alabama · Dec 31, 1969

See Kirkpatrick v. Preisler, 394 U.S. 526 , 89 S.Ct. 1225 , 22 L.Ed.2d 519 (1969); Wells v. Rockefeller, 394 U.S. 542 , 89 S.Ct. 1234 , 22 L.Ed.2d 535 (1969); Wesberry v. … Burns v. Richardson, 384 U.S. 73 , 86 S.Ct. 1286 , 16 L.Ed.2d 376 . The court declines to attempt any re-districting.

Coleman v. Alabama State University

904 F. Supp. 2d 1245 · District Court, M.D. Alabama · Oct 24, 2012

Dist. v. Breeden, 532 U.S. 268, 273 , 121 S.Ct. 1508 , 149 L.Ed.2d 509 (2001)). “Even a three-month interval between the protected expression and the employment action ... is too long.” Brown v. Ala. … See Brown v. Ala. Dep’t of *1255 Transp., 597 F.3d 1160, 1181-82 (11th Cir.2010) (noting that pretext becomes a relevant issue only after the plaintiff has established a prima facie case).

J.S. v. Autauga County Board of Education (LEAD)

District Court, M.D. Alabama · May 3, 2023

v. ) 2:22cv284-MHT ) (WO) AUTAUGA COUNTY BOARD OF ) EDUCATION … Four v.

Melton v. National Dairy LLC

705 F. Supp. 2d 1303 · District Court, M.D. Alabama · Mar 31, 2010

Fed.R.CivP. 56(e); Johnson v. Board of Regents of University of Georgia, 263 F.3d 1234, 1264 (11th Cir.2001). If the evidence is merely colorable or is not significantly probative, summary judgment may be granted. … Brown, 597 F.3d at 1179 -80 (quoting Chappell-Johnson v.

Bunke v. Alabama Bd. of Nursing State of Ala.

871 F. Supp. 1437 · District Court, M.D. Alabama · Dec 6, 1994

This is especially so in cases such as this where the decisions of an administrative body such as the Nursing Board, are subject to judicial review. § 41-22-20(a) Code of Alabama, Smith v. … Burney v. Polk Comm. College, 728 F.2d 1374 , 1378 n. 11 (11th Cir. 1984); Evers v. Brd. of Med.

Dunn v. Dunn

219 F. Supp. 3d 1163 · District Court, M.D. Alabama · Nov 25, 2016

Legal Servs., Inc. v. St. Elizabeth’s Hosp., 2005 WL 3275915 , at *5 (D.D.C. July 22, 2005) (Hogan, J.); see also Brown v. Stone, 66 F.Supp.2d 412, 425 (E.D.N.Y. 1999) (Block, J.) … United Food & Commercial Workers Union v. Brown Grp., Inc., 517 U.S. 544, 555-58 , 116 S.Ct. 1529 , 134 L.Ed.2d 758 (1996).

Kelly v. Montgomery Water Works and Sanitary Sewer Board (MAG+)

District Court, M.D. Alabama · May 1, 2025

Elite Roofing, LLC, et al., Case No. 2:24- cv-00388-MHT-JTA; Kelly v. Montgomery County and City Board, et al., Case No. 2:24-cv- 00362-ECM-KFP; Kelly v. … Kelly v.

Spivey v. Enterprise City Board of Education (CONSENT)

District Court, M.D. Alabama · Sep 21, 2021

The Board asserts Spivey was terminated for excessive, unauthorized absenteeism. (Doc. No. 72 at 22.) This is a legitimate, nondiscriminatory reason for the Board’s action. See Duckworth v. … In short, the Board is entitled to summary judgment. V.