Case law

Hill v. City of Montgomery, Alabama (NO DISCOVERY DOC 228) (CONSENT)

District Court, M.D. Alabama · Dec 14, 2022

See, e.g., Brown v. Bellinger, 843 F. … Terry, 392 U.S. at 11; see also Brown v. Texas, 443 U.S. 47, 51 (1979) (citations omitted).

MERCURY FIN. CORP. OF ALA. v. Aetna Cas. Co.

900 F. Supp. 390 · District Court, M.D. Alabama · Aug 22, 1995

See Shamrock Oil and Gas Corp. v. Sheets, 313 U.S. 100 , 61 S.Ct. 868 , 85 L.Ed. 1214 (1941); Butler v. Polk, 592 F.2d 1293 (5th Cir.1979); Paxton v. Weaver, 553 F.2d 936 (5th Cir.1977). … While the members of the board of directors met and lived in New York, the court found that the board had delegated its managerial or operational duties to a committee comprised of Pennsylvania residents.

Anderson-Free v. Steptoe

970 F. Supp. 945 · District Court, M.D. Alabama · Feb 27, 1997

See Johnson v. … Br. at 4. 4 .Plaintiffs have named the members of the Board of Trustees as defendants in this action.

Clayton v. Woodmen of the World Life Insurance Society

981 F. Supp. 1447 · District Court, M.D. Alabama · Oct 28, 1997

See Polish National Alliance, et al. v. National Labor Relations Board, 322 U.S. 643 , 64 S.Ct. 1196 , 88 L.Ed. 1509 (1944). … See Staples v.

Jacoby v. Hamm (INMATE 4)

District Court, M.D. Alabama · Feb 28, 2024

United States v. Bottoson, 644 F.2d 1174, 1176 (5th Cir. Unit B May 15, 1981) (per curiam); see also Rudolph v. … See, e.g., Rudolph v. Allen, supra; Brown v. Pena, 441 F. Supp. 1382 (S.D.

Kister v. Wynn (INMATE 1)

District Court, M.D. Alabama · Jan 19, 2024

United States v. Bottoson, 644 F.2d 1174, 1176 (5th Cir. Unit B May 15, 1981) (per curiam); see also Rudolph v. … See, e.g., Rudolph v. Allen, supra; Brown v. Pena, 441 F. Supp. 1382 (S.D.

United States v. $2,202.00 In United States Currency (MAG+)

District Court, M.D. Alabama · Jan 12, 2024

United States v. Bottoson, 644 F.2d 1174, 1176 (5th Cir. Unit B May 15, 1981) (per curiam); see also Rudolph v. … See, e.g., Rudolph v. Allen, supra; Brown v. Pena, 441 F. Supp. 1382 (S.D.

Ritter v. Speakman (INMATE 4)

District Court, M.D. Alabama · Oct 17, 2023

United States v. Bottoson, 644 F.2d 1174, 1176 (5th Cir. Unit B May 15, 1981) (per curiam); see also Rudolph v. … See, e.g., Rudolph v. Allen, supra; Brown v. Pena, 441 F. Supp. 1382 (S.D.

Smith v. Paris

257 F. Supp. 901 · District Court, M.D. Alabama · Aug 22, 1966

See United States v. State of Alabama, supra; Gomillion v. Lightfoot, supra; Sims v. Baggett, supra; Sellers v. Trussell, supra. … In a recent three-judge case from this district, tile Court held, for a variety of reasons, that the reapportionment principles did not • extend to the Boards of Revenue of Randolph and Houston Counties, Alabama.

Smith v. United States of America (INMATE 3)

District Court, M.D. Alabama · Jul 13, 2020

United States v. Bottoson, 644 F.2d 1174, 1176 Rudolph v. Allen, 666 F.2d 519, 520 (11th Cir. 1982) (per curiam); Morris v. … See, e.g., Rudolph v. Allen, supra; Brown v. Pena, 441 F. Supp. 1382 (S.D.

Ray v. Pate's Chapel Baptist Church and Cemetery (MAG+)

District Court, M.D. Alabama · Mar 24, 2021

United States v. Bottoson, 644 F.2d 1174, 1176 (5th Cir. Unit B May 15, 1981) (per curiam); see also Rudolph v. … See, e.g., Rudolph v. Allen, supra; Brown v. Pena, 441 F. Supp. 1382 (S.D.

Valley National Bank v. Czapla (MAG+)

District Court, M.D. Alabama · May 3, 2023

Thus, the Court will recommend an across-the-board rate appropriate for the more experience paralegals. as reasonable unchallenged paralegal rate of $80 per hour); Weekes-Walker v. Macon Cnty. … App’x 927, 931 (11th Cir. 2013) (upholding 25% across-the-board reduction where district court was unable to ascertain time spent on each task through billing records)); see also Nicholson v.

Washington v. Holman

245 F. Supp. 116 · District Court, M.D. Alabama · Jul 6, 1965

Brown, a deputy sheriff of the county, testified that he himself had put the subpoena in an envelope addressed to Jones at the above-stated address.” 2 For the reasons hereafter appearing, this Court has concluded that the … Wiggington v. State, 205 Ala. 147 , 87 So. 700 ; Wilson v. State, 140 Ala. 43 , 37 So. 93 ; Sims v. State, 139 Ala. 74 , 36 So. 138 .

Spann v. Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance

795 F. Supp. 386 · District Court, M.D. Alabama · Jul 27, 1992

In Schwartz v. … See also, Peckham v. Board of Trustees, etc., 653 F.2d 424 (10th Cir.1981).

Manuel v. Ivey (INMATE 1)(NO DISCOVERY)

District Court, M.D. Alabama · Feb 10, 2022

United States v. Bottoson, 644 F.2d 1174, 1176 (5th Cir. Unit B May 15, 1981) (per curiam); see also Rudolph v. … See, e.g., Rudolph v. Allen, supra; Brown v. Pena, 441 F. Supp. 1382 (S.D.

Morris v. Hamm (INMATE 4)

District Court, M.D. Alabama · Jul 14, 2023

United States v. Bottoson, 644 F.2d 1174, 1176 (5th Cir. Unit B May 15, 1981) (per curiam); see also Rudolph v. … See, e.g., Rudolph v. Allen, supra; Brown v. Pena, 441 F. Supp. 1382 (S.D.

Sullen v. Dunn (INMATE 2)

District Court, M.D. Alabama · Apr 21, 2020

United States v. Bottoson, 644 F.2d 1174, 1176 (5th Cir. Unit B May 15, 1981) (per curiam); see also Rudolph v. … See, e.g., Rudolph v. Allen, supra; Brown v. Pena, 441 F. Supp. 1382 (S.D.

Howard v. United States of America (INMATE 3)

District Court, M.D. Alabama · Apr 21, 2020

United States v. Bottoson, 644 F.2d 1174, 1176 (5th Cir. Unit B May 15, 1981) (per curiam); see also Rudolph v. … See, e.g., Rudolph v. Allen, supra; Brown v. Pena, 441 F. Supp. 1382 (S.D.

Campbell v. Bennett

340 F. Supp. 2d 1301 · District Court, M.D. Alabama · Sep 20, 2004

In this lawsuit, plaintiff Ray Campbell challenges a change in the deadline for independent-candidate registration, and the corresponding rejection of his candidacy by the State Election Board based on his failure to satisfy … Campbell v. Bennett, 212 F.Supp.2d 1339 (M.D.Ala.2002). Campbell *1303 and the defendants now move for summary judgment.

Dees v. Jones (INMATE 1)

District Court, M.D. Alabama · Nov 24, 2020

United States v. Bottoson, 644 F.2d 1174, 1176 (5th Cir. Unit B May 15, 1981) (per curiam); see also Rudolph v. … See, e.g., Rudolph v. Allen, supra; Brown v. Pena, 441 F. Supp. 1382 (S.D.