The opinion
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION
CATHY RAY and )
DEBBIE GONZALEZ, )
)
Plaintiffs, )
) CIVIL ACTION NO.
v. ) 2:18cv828-MHT
) (WO)
PATE’S CHAPEL BAPTIST )
CHURCH AND CEMETERY, et )
al., )
)
Defendants. )
ORDER
This cause is now before the court on the plaintiffs’
motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis (Doc. 104).
28 U.S.C. § 1915(a) provides that, "An appeal may
not be taken in forma pauperis if the trial court
certifies in writing that it is not taken in good faith."
In making this determination as to good faith, a court
must use an objective standard, such as whether the
appeal is "frivolous," Coppedge v. United States, 369
U.S. 438, 445 (1962), or "has no substantive merit."
United States v. Bottoson, 644 F.2d 1174, 1176 (5th Cir.
Unit B May 15, 1981) (per curiam); see also Rudolph v.
Allen, 666 F.2d 519, 520 (11th Cir. 1982) (per curiam);
Morris v. Ross, 663 F.2d 1032 (11th Cir. 1981). Applying
this standard, this court is of the opinion, for the
reasons stated in the recommendation of the magistrate
judge, that the plaintiff's appeal is without a legal or
factual basis and, accordingly, is frivolous and not
taken in good faith. See, e.g., Rudolph v. Allen, supra;
Brown v. Pena, 441 F. Supp. 1382 (S.D. Fla. 1977), aff'd
without opinion, 589 F.2d 1113 (5th Cir. 1979).
***
Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the plaintiffs’
motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis (Doc. 104)
is denied; and that the appeal in this cause is certified,
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a), as not taken in good
faith.
DONE, this the 24th day of March, 2021.
/s/ Myron H. Thompson
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE