Case law

Clayton v. State

31 Ala. App. 106 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Jun 30, 1942

Copeland, a member of the County Board of Education, and numerous others. … Sup., 5 So.2d 825 1 ; Elliott v. State, 26 Ala. 78 ; Lindsey et al. v. State, 48 Ala. 169 ; McGehee v. State, 58 Ala. 360 ; Cox v. State, 76 Ala. 66 ; Johnson v. State, 44 Ala. 414 .

Allison v. Briskey

36 Ala. App. 225 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Oct 2, 1951

Alabama Baptist Hospital Board v. Carter, 226 Ala. 109 , 145 So. 443 . … Acklen[’s Executor] v.

Andala Company v. Ganus

40 Ala. App. 455 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Jun 17, 1958

See also Alabama Textile Products Corporation v. Rodgers, 38 Ala.App. 206 , 82 So.2d 267 . In Bunny’s Waffle Shop v. … Alabama Mills v. Carnley, 35 Ala.App. 46 , 44 So.2d 622 , 14 A.L.R.2d 1301 .

Moragne v. State

16 Ala. App. 351 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Jan 22, 1918

BROWN, P. J. … Co., supra), and the further holding in Crane v.

Brasher v. State

33 Ala. App. 13 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Jun 18, 1946

App. 349 , 197 So. 75 , certiorari denied 240 Ala. 52 , 197 So. 81 ; Lee v. State, 31 Ala. App. 91 , 13 So.2d 583 , certiorari denied 244 Ala. 401 , 13 So.2d 590 ; Brown v. State, Ala.App., 22 So.2d 445 ; 1 Lee v. … State, 246 Ala. 69 , 18 So.2d 706 ; Daniels v. State, 243 Ala. 675 , 11 So.2d 756 ; Robinson v. State, 243 Ala. 684 , 11 So.2d 732 ; Johnson v. State, 242 Ala. 278 , 5 So.2d 632 ; Jackson v.

Continental Gin Co. v. Milbrat

10 Ala. App. 351 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Apr 23, 1914

. — Huy ck v. McNerney, 163 Ala. 244 , 50 South. 926 ; Sloss-Sheffield Steel & Iron Co. v. Mobley, 139 Ala. 425 , 36 South. 181 . … Co. v. Brantley, 168 Ala. 579, 590 , 53 South. 305 .

Veitch v. Illinois Cent. R. R.

14 Ala. App. 146 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Apr 6, 1915

BROWN, J. (1) The appeal in this case was sued out in term time on the 1st day of April, 1914, and was therefore returnable on the first Monday next after the expiration of 20 days *148 from suing out the appeal, or April … —McAnally v.

Chambers v. State

17 Ala. App. 178 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Jun 10, 1919

BROWN, P. J. In Kuykendall v. State, 76 South. 487 , 1 and Evans v. State, 201 Ala. 693 , 79 South. 240 , it was held that the purpose and effect of the act of the Legislature approved August 18, 1909 (Acts Spec. … State, 61 Ala. 201 ; Weston v. State, 63 Ala. 157 ; Billingslea v. State, 68 Ala. 490 ; Hall v.

Gray v. State

44 Ala. App. 12 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Apr 11, 1967

See also Williams v. State, 34 Ala.App. 253 , 39 So.2d 29 ; Holland v. State, 24 Ala.App. 199 , 132 So. 601 ; Griffin v. State, 90 Ala. 596 , 8 So. 670 ; Williams v. State, 18 Ala. App. 573 , 93 So. 284 ; Moulton v. … State, 199 Ala. 411 , 74 So. 454 ; Neal v. State, 36 Ala.App. 156 , 54 So.2d 613 ; and Nix v. State, 40 Ala.App. 357 , 114 So.2d 286 . In Davis v.

Louisville & Nashville R. R. v. Myers

14 Ala. App. 310 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Nov 4, 1915

Co. v. Cockrell, 10 Ala. App. 578 , 65 South. 704 . See, also, Birmingham Ry., L. & P. Co. v. Barrett, 179 Ala. 274 , 60 South. 262; Birmingham Ry., L. & P. Co. v. Barrett, 4 Ala. App. 347 , 58 South. 760 ; A. G. S. R. … Co. v. Hill, 93 Ala. 514 , 9 South. 722 , 30 Am. St. Rep. 65 ; C. & E. R. R. Co. v. Mallette, 92 Ala. 209 , 9 South. 363 ; G. & A. U. Ry. Co. v. Causler, 97 Ala. 235 , 12 South. 439 .

City of Birmingham v. Edwards

18 Ala. App. 459 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Apr 4, 1922

SlossSheffield Co. v. Smith, 175 Ala. 260 , 57 South. 29 ; Fealy v. City of Birmingham, 15 Ala. App. 367 , 73 South. 296 ; and Bracely v. Noble, 201 Ala. 74 , 77 South. 368 . … The cases of Montgomery v. Davis, 15 Ala. App. 606 , 74 South. 730 , Ex parte Davis, 200 Ala. 436 , 76 South. 368 , and Culpepper v. Adams, 1 Ala.

United Security Life Insurance v. Dupree

41 Ala. App. 601 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Oct 18, 1962

Reliance Life Insurance Company v. Russell, 208 Ala. 559 , 94 So. 748 ; Cassady v. Williams, 234 Ala. 299 , 174 So. 485 ; Kurn v. Counts, 247 Ala. 129 , 22 So.2d 725 , Rule 34, Circuit Court practice. … Roe v. Brown, 249 Ala. 425 , 31 So.2d 599 ; Mercantile Life Insurance Company v. Johnson, ante, p. 307, 132 So.2d 248 .

Penn Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. Cobbs

23 Ala. App. 205 · Alabama Court of Appeals · May 14, 1929

Love v. State, 16 Ala. App. 44 , 75 So. 189 ; Brown v. State, 142 Ala. 287 , 38 So. 268 ; Jackson v. State, 94 Ala. 89 , 10 So. 509 ; Wigmore Ev. § 300. … Co. v.

Lumpkin v. State

19 Ala. App. 272 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Jun 12, 1923

Bush v. State, 168 Ala. 81 , 53 South. 266 ; Walker v. State, 117 Ala. 85 , 23 South, 670 ; Thomas v. State, 15 Ala. App. 408 , 73 South. 558 ; Childress v. State, supra; Sanderson v. State, supra. … Franklin v. State, supra ; Brown v. State, 137 Ala. 99 , 34 South. 822 . There is no merit in assignments 6, 7, 8, and 9.

Lawman v. State

18 Ala. App. 569 · Alabama Court of Appeals · May 16, 1922

See also Morea's Case 2 Ala. 275 ; Parsons v. State, 21 Ala. 300 ; McAllister v. State, 17 Ala. 434 , 52 Am. Dec. 180 ; Winter v. State, 123 Ala. 1 , 11 , 26 So. 949 ; Huckabee v. State v. … Miller v.

Rector v. State

11 Ala. App. 333 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Dec 17, 1914

BROWN, J. The law (Acts Sp. … And what is thus known, juries are permitted to find, without specific proof being adduced in its support.” — Wall v. State, 78 Ala. 418 ; City Council v. Wright, 72 Ala. 411 , 47 Am. Rep. 422 ; Watson v.

Caffey v. Alabama MacHinery & Supply Co.

19 Ala. App. 189 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Nov 21, 1922

Wks. v. Lacy & Sons, 12 Ala. App. 464 , 67 South. 754 ; 2 R. C. L. p. 456, par. 202; Hogan v. Thorington, S Port. 428; Munroe v. … Bell v. Reynolds, 78 Ala. 511 56 Am. Rep. 52 ; Reynolds v.

Lloyd's of London v. Fidelity Securities Corp.

39 Ala. App. 596 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Oct 7, 1958

See Code 1940, T. 7, § 260 (second and third sentences); Browne v. Giger, 221 Ala. 176 , 128 So. 174 . … Rawleigh Co. v.

Central of Georgia Ry. Co. v. Knight

3 Ala. App. 436 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Nov 30, 1911

Co. v. Garthright, 151 Ala. 413 , 44 South. 212 . … —Daugherty v. Am. U. Tel. Co., 75 Ala. 168 , 51 Am. Rep. 435 .

Mullins v. State

28 Ala. App. 288 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Jun 21, 1938

One day the old man who is the appellant, as it seems was his wont, “got tight” — by which 'we mean he took on board too much intoxicating liquor. This little spree of his occurred in the morning of the day in question. … Scoggins et al. v. State, 120 Ala. 369 , 25 So. 180 .