Case law

Smith v. Alabama Dry Dock & Shipbuilding Co.

293 Ala. 644 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Mar 6, 1975

Saenger Theatres Corp. v. McDermott et al., 237 Ala. 489 , 187 So. 460 ; Theater Company v. Manning et al., 236 Ala. 670 , 185 So. 171 ; Jefferson County v. Johnson, 232 Ala. 406 , 168 So. 450 . … City of Mobile v. Scott, 278 Ala. 388 , 178 So.2d 545 ; State ex rel. Baxley v. Johnson, 293 Ala. 69 , 300 So.2d 106 . In view of our decision, mandamus is appropriate, although perhaps unnecessary. Wood v.

Ray v. State

66 Ala. 281 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Dec 15, 1880

. — Clark’s Manual, § 883; Brown v. The State, 55 Ala. 123 ; 3 Greenl. Ev. § 76; 2 Russ, on Crimes, 9th ed., 2; 2 Bish. Or. Law, § 91.

Green v. State

241 Ala. 288 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Apr 17, 1941

BROWN, Justice. The petition seeks to review the Court of Appeals on a conclusion of fact. The writ is denied on the authority of Postal Tel.-Cable Co. v. Minderhout, 195 Ala. 420 , 71 So. 91 . Writ denied. GARDNER, C.

O'Neil v. State

134 Ala. 664 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Nov 15, 1902

Robison Brown, for appellant. From a judgment denying the petitioner’s discharge, he prosecutes the present appeal. . The judgment is affirmed on the authority of O’Neil v. The State, infra, 189, and White v.

Garrett v. Davis

216 Ala. 74 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Apr 14, 1927

Cowley v. Farrow, 193 Ala. 381, 384 , 69 So. 114 . … J., and THOMAS and BROWN, JJ., concur.

Hill v. Talladega College

502 So. 2d 735 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jan 30, 1987

Appraisal Services, Inc. v. Carmichael , 404 So.2d 666 (Ala. 1981). . . . … See Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth , 408 U.S. 564 , 92 S.Ct. 2701 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972).

Beyer v. National Building & Loan Ass'n

131 Ala. 369 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Nov 15, 1901

Asso. v. Brown, 128 Ala. 462 ; Barrett v. C. B. & L. Assn., 130 Ala. 294 . 3. … Asso. v. Brown, 128 Ala. 462 . *377 5.

Lawler v. Hyde

230 Ala. 467 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Mar 28, 1935

However, in Stickney v. … X, and THOMAS and BROWN, JJ., concur. _

Seals v. Rogers

172 Ala. 651 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jun 1, 1911

. — Murphree v. Summerlin, 114 Ala. 54 , *654 21 South. 470 ; Beatty v. Brown, 101 Ala. 695 , 14 South. 368 ; Beebe v. Button, 99 Ala. 117 , 12 South. 567 ; Burke v. Brewer, 133 Ala. 389 , 32 South. 602 ; Baker v.

Kitchen v. Moye

17 Ala. 143 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jun 15, 1849

In Wood v. Brown, 8 Ala. Rep. 563 , this court held that the statute ivas mandatory and imperative.

Lary v. Valiant Insurance Co.

864 So. 2d 1111 · Supreme Court of Alabama · May 16, 2003

BROWN, Justice. The petition for the writ of certiorari is denied. … Horsley v. Horsley, 291 Ala. 782 , 280 So.2d 155 (1973). WRIT DENIED. MOORE, C.J., and SEE, HARWOOD, and STUART, JJ., concur.

Mullins v. State

236 Ala. 578 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Oct 13, 1938

Petition of Jim Mullins for certiorari to the Court of Appeals to review and revise the judgment and decision of that Court in the case of Mullins v. State, 183 So. 894 . Writ denied. ANDERSON, C. … J., and BROWN and KNIGHT, JJ., concur.

Big Red Elephant v. Bryant

477 So. 2d 342 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Sep 27, 1985

.; Brown v. Wheeler, 437 So.2d 521 (Ala.1983).” … Brown v. Wheeler, 437 So.2d 521 (Ala.1983). For the foregoing reasons, the judgment is due to be, and it is hereby, affirmed. AFFIRMED. TORBERT, C.J., and FAULKNER, SHORES and HOUSTON, JJ„ concur. .

Pruett v. First Nat. Bank of Anniston

229 Ala. 441 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Dec 6, 1934

Perry v. Seals, 186 Ala. 514 , 65 So. 151 ; Costephens et al. v. Dean et al., 69 Ala. 385 ; Tompkins v. Drennen, 95 Ala. 463 , 10 So. 638 ; Brown v. Copeland, 206 Ala. 124 , 89 So. 274 ; Union Bank & Trust Co. v. … McMillan v. Aiken, 205 Ala. 35, 40 , 88 So. 135 . The judgment of the circuit court is affirmed. Affirmed. ANDERSON, O. J., and BROWN and KNIGHT, JJ., concur.

Town of Ragland v. Poe

222 Ala. 548 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Apr 2, 1931

BROWN, J. There are but two assignments of error on the record. The first is predicated on the refusal of the affirmative charge requested in writing by the defendant. … Garrett v. State, 215 Ala, 224, 110 So. 23 ; Sanders v. Steen, 128 Ala. 633 , 29 So. 586 ; Clardy v. Walker, 132 Ala. 264 , 31 So. 78 ; Davis v. State, 168 Ala. 53 , 52 So. 939 .

Bailes v. Bailes

216 Ala. 569 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Oct 13, 1927

BROWN, J. This bill is by the wife against the husband for alimony, without divorce. … Murray v. Murray, 84 Ala. 363 , 4 So. 239 ; Brady v. Brady, 144 Ala. 414 , 39 So. 237 ; Clisby v. Clisby, 160 Ala. 572 , 49 So. 445 , 135 Am. St. Rep. 110 ; Rearden v. Rearden, 210 Ala. 129 , 97 So. 138 .

Chappell v. State

71 Ala. 322 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Dec 15, 1882

We have not been able to find the Georgia statute in our library, but from a remark of the court in Brown v. The State, 60 Ga. 210 , we infer the statement was to be made without oath. … State v. Witham, 72 Me. 531 ; People v. Brown, 72 N. Y. 571 ; S. C. 28 Amer. Rep. 183; State v. Clinton, 67 Mo. 380 ; S. C. 29 Amer. Rep. 506; State v. Cohn, 9 Nev. 179 ; Hanoff v. The State, 37 Ohio Stat. 178.

Ingram Land Company v. T. A. Moore

218 Ala. 181 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Oct 11, 1928

The decisions in Ingram Land Co. v. Moore, 213 Ala. 19 , 104 So. 134 , and Gulf City Const. Co. v. L. & N. R. Co., 121 Ala. 621 , 25 So. 579 , on which was rested the decision in Ingram Land Co. v. … J., and SAYRE and BROWN, JJ., concur.

Griffith v. City of Birmingham

252 Ala. 129 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Mar 31, 1949

Petition of John Ike Griffith for certiorari to the Court of Appeals to review and revise the judgment and decision of that Court in the case of Griffith v. City of Birmingham, Ala.App., 39' So.2d 693. Writ denied. … BROWN, LAWSON, and STAKELY, JJ., concur.

McCoy v. L. & N. R. R.

146 Ala. 333 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Nov 29, 1905

. — Blann v. Cocheron, 20 Ala. 320 ; O'Neal v. Brown, 21 Ala. 482 ; Du Bose v. Marx, 52 Ala. 506 ; Smith v. Gayle, 58 Ala. 600 ; Lyman, v. Hendrix, 1 Ala. 212; Vandiver v. … In either case the sufferer is entitled to but one compensation for the same injury, and full satisfaction from one will operate as a discharge of the other.”— Brown v. Cambridge, 3 Allen 474 ; Abb v. N. P. R.