Case law

Deslandes v. Scales

187 Ala. 25 · Supreme Court of Alabama · May 14, 1914

Co. v. Gonzalez., 183 Ala. 273 , 61 South. 85 . … —Brigham v. Carlisle, 78 Ala. 243 , 56 Am. Rep. 28 . *32 The profits per boarder to a boarding house keeper are essentially uncertain and contingent and inevitably unstable.

Holt v. State

229 Ala. 368 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Nov 1, 1934

Holt for certiorari to the Court of Appeals to review and revise the judgment and decision of that court in Holt v. State, 157 So. 449 . Writ denied. ANDERSON, C. J., and BROWN and KNIGHT, JJ., concur.

Harris v. State

248 Ala. 389 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Nov 7, 1946

BROWN, Justice. … Turk v. State, 140 Ala. 110 , 37 So. 234 ; Flanigan v. State, 247 Ala. 642 , 25 So.2d 685 .

Opinion of the Justices

280 Ala. 692 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Apr 17, 1967

Kendrick v. Boyd, 255 Ala. 53, 55 , 51 So.2d 694 . We therefore answer Question (1) in the negative and Question (2) in the affirmative. … Rogers v. City of Mobile, 277 Ala. 261, 281 , 169 So.2d 282 .

Miglionico v. Birmingham News Co.

378 So. 2d 677 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Dec 7, 1979

Executive or secret sessions of certain boards. … In Laman v.

Harrison v. Bird

621 So. 2d 972 · Supreme Court of Alabama · May 28, 1993

See Stiles v. Brown , 380 So.2d 792 (Ala. 1980); see, also, Snider v. Burks , 84 Ala. 53 , 4 So. 225 (1887). … See Stiles v. Brown , supra. From a careful review of the record, we conclude, as did the trial court, that the evidence presented by Ms. Harrison was not sufficient to rebut the presumption that Ms.

Rorerts v. Strang, Adriance & Co.

38 Ala. 566 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jan 15, 1863

In the case of Browning v. … Of similar import are the following cases: Couch v. Mills, 21 Wendell, 424 ; Dean v. Newhall, 8 Term Rep. 168 ; Rowleg v. Stoddard, 7 Johns. 207 ; Lane v. Owings, 3 Bibb, 247 ; Catskill Bank v.

Missildine v. Avondale Mills, Inc.

415 So. 2d 1040 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Dec 18, 1981

Fountain v. Phillips , 404 So.2d 614 (Ala. 1981); Butler v. Michigan Mutual Insurance Co. , 402 So.2d 949 (Ala. 1981); Amason v. First State Bank of Lineville , 369 So.2d 547 (Ala. 1979); Ragland v. … Fountain v. Phillips , 404 So.2d 614 (Ala. 1981); Browning v. Birmingham News , 348 So.2d 455 (Ala. 1977).

Scott v. Jackson Securities & Investment Co.

225 Ala. 90 · Supreme Court of Alabama · May 26, 1932

Taylor v. Mathews, 53 Fla. 776 , 44 So. 146 ; Wilcox v. Moudy, 82 Ind. 219 ; Phillips v. Jacobs, 145 Mich. 108 , 108 N. W. 899 ; Brown v. Tallman (N. J. Ch.) 54 A. 457 ; Willard v. Reas, 26 Wis. 540 . … J., and THOMAS and BROWN, JJ., concur.

Little v. State

252 Ala. 81 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Mar 24, 1949

Petition of Milton Little for certiorari to the Court of Appeals to review and revise the judgment and decision of that Court in the case of Little v. State, 39 So.2d 587 . Writ denied. … BROWN, FOSTER, and LAWSON, JJ., concur.

Jordan v. Sumners

222 Ala. 314 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jun 19, 1930

Dwine v. Brown, 35 Ala. 596 ; Norwood v. Kirby’s Adm’r, 70 Ala. 397 ; Houston v. Harris & McCurdy, 71 Ala. 570 ; Pugh v. Davis, 103 Ala. 316 , 18 So. 8 , 49 Am. St. Rep. 30 ; Nicrosi v. … Calhoun v. Fletcher, 63 Ala. 574 . Rehearing granted; judgment of reversal set aside, and cause affirmed. ANDERSON, C. J., and GARDNER and FOSTER, JJ., concur. SAYRE, THOMAS, and BROWN, JJ., dissent.

Elgin v. Alfa Corp.

598 So. 2d 807 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Apr 17, 1992

"The board of Alfa Corporation ('Alfa') is composed of eleven persons. Six of the directors serving on the Mutual Companies boards also serve as board members of Alfa. … In Davis v.

City of Birmingham v. Waits

706 So. 2d 1127 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Nov 7, 1997

See, e.g., City of Birmingham v. Benson, 631 So.2d 902 (Ala.1993); Thetford v. City of Clanton, 605 So.2d 835 (Ala.1992); Nail v. Jefferson County Truck Growers Association, Inc., 542 So.2d 1208 (Ala.1988). … City of Birmingham v. Hale, 574 So.2d 784 (Ala.1991); City of Birmingham v. Thompson, 404 So.2d 589 (Ala.1981); Wassman v. Mobile County Communications Dis *1131 trict, 665 So.2d 941 (Ala.1995); Craig v.

First Nat. Bank of Dothan v. Western Union Tel. Co.

225 Ala. 38 · Supreme Court of Alabama · May 26, 1932

Bank of Dothan v. Western Union Tel. Co., 142 So. 99 . Writ denied. ANDERSON, C. J., and THOMAS, BROWN, and KNIGHT, JJ., concur.

McCarty v. Harris

216 Ala. 265 · Supreme Court of Alabama · May 26, 1927

BROWN, J. This bill is filed by the appellees to require specific performance of a contract to sell and convey real property. … Co. v. Jones, 79 Ala. 475 .

Davis v. Southland Corp.

465 So. 2d 397 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Feb 8, 1985

Vaughn, the members of the Personnel Board, on November 18, 1982; weren't they? "A Yes. . . ." Davis argues that evidence of his prior arrests was improperly admitted. He cites Bracy v. … He also cites Dean v. Johnston , 281 Ala. 602 , 206 So.2d 610 (1968), and Meador v. State , 37 Ala.

Harris v. Jenkins

265 Ala. 315 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Nov 1, 1956

Co. v. Hall, 229 U.S. 511 , 33 S.Ct. 885 , 57 L.Ed. 1306 ; Brown Shoe Co. v. Schaefer, 242 Ala. 310 , 6 So.2d 405 ; Booth v. Bates, 215 Ala. 632 , 112 So. 209 . … In Brown Shoe Co. v.

Ex parte May

254 Ala. 626 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Dec 14, 1950

The majority of the Justices are of the opinion that the question presented in this case has become moot by reason of the decision in Bridges v. … BROWN, J., concurs specially.

Birmingham Realty Co. v. City of Birmingham

205 Ala. 278 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Feb 3, 1921

Southern Express Co. v. Brickman, 187 Ala. 637 , 65 South. 954 . … Winkler v. Courson, 160 Ala. 374 , 49 South. 341 ; Gray v. South. Ry. Co., 116 Ala. 654 , 22 South. 973 ; Pitard v. McDowell, 6 Ala. App. 236 , 60 South. 555 .

Wilson v. State

238 Ala. 496 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Nov 16, 1939

BROWN, Justice. The appeal is on the record, there being-no bill of exceptions. … Carmichael v. State, 213 Ala. 264 , 104 So. 638 ; Talbert v. State, 140 Ala. 96 , 37 So. 78 . The record and proceeding of the Circuit Court appearing in all things regular, the judgment will be affirmed. Affirmed.