Case law

City of Birmingham v. McConnell

227 Ala. 438 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Oct 5, 1933

Acts 1923, p. 707) creating for cities of this size what is known as a “Park and Recreation Board.” The case of Dean v. … Section 2295, Code 1923; 20 Corpus Juris, 624; Dean v. County Board of Education, supra.

Enzor v. State

232 Ala. 257 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Mar 19, 1936

Enzor for certiorari to the Court of Appeals to review and revise the judgment and decision of that pourt in Enzor v. State, 167 So. 336 . Writ denied. ANDERSON, C. J., and BROWN and KNIGHT, JJ., concur.

Greater Friendship A.M.E. Church v. Spann

336 So. 2d 1087 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jun 11, 1976

Geiss v. Trinity Lutheran Church Congregation, 119 Neb. 745 , 230 N.W. 658 (1930); Grupe v. Rudisill, 101 N.J.Eq. 145, 136 A. 911 (1927). … Owens & Co. v. Blanks, 225 Ala. 566 , 144 So. 35 (1932), as quoted in the later case of Hooks v.

Forrester v. Forrester

39 Ala. 320 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jan 15, 1864

—Ex parte Remson, 31 Ala. 270 ; Harrell v. State, 26 Ala. 52 ; Brown and Wife v. Clements, 24 Ala. 354 ; Drinkard v. State, 20 Ala. 9 ; Wiswall v. Glidden, 4 Ala. 357 . [2.] … —Code, § 1361; Green v. Green, 7 Porter, 19 . But we da not think it is indispensable for it to appear from tbe decree tbat proof was made of tbe correctness of tbat statement.

Howard v. State Ex Rel. Andrews

238 Ala. 185 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jun 22, 1939

BROWN, Justice. … Ridge v. State ex rel. Tate, 206 Ala. 349 , 89 So. 742 ; Brown v. State ex rel. Wright, Solicitor, 222 Ala. 623 , 133 So. 913 .

Fourth Nat. Bank v. Woolfolk

220 Ala. 344 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Oct 17, 1929

Co. v. Westcott, 166 Ala. 192 , 52 So. 344 ; T. L. Brown Co. v. Tishomingo Banking Co., supra; Haase v. Bank, supra. … SAYRE, BOULDIN, and BROWN, JJ., concur.

American Nat. Ins. Co. v. Moss

215 Ala. 542 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Mar 24, 1927

BROWN, J. … Co. v. Lokey, 166 Ala. 174 , 52 So. 45 .

Kizer v. Lock

9 Ala. 269 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jan 15, 1846

[Case v. Barber, Sir T. Ray. 450; see also, Brown v. Barnes, 6 Ala. Rep. 694 .] From this view, it results, that the court erred in the decision made; its judgment is therefore reversed and the cause remanded.

Burnett Bean v. Miller

205 Ala. 606 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Apr 21, 1921

Co. v. Sprague, 196 Ala. 148 , 72 South. 96 ; Welch v. Evans Bros. Const. Co., 189 Ala. 548 , 66 South. 517 ; Krebs Mfg. Co. v. Brown, 108 Ala. 508 , 18 South. 659 , 54 Am. St. … Co. v. Mitchell, 181 Ala. 576, 585 , 61 South. 934 ; Houston v. Elrod, 203 Ala. 41 , 81 South. 831 ; A & B. A. L. Ry. Co. v. Brown, 158 Ala. 607 , 48 South. 73 ; Central of Ga. Ry. Co. v. Keyton, supra; Gosdin v.

Flagg v. Florence Discount Co.

228 Ala. 153 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Mar 1, 1934

Brown.” The complainant submitted the cause upon the original bill and exhibits thereto and upon the testimony of J. T. Flagg the complainant. … J., and THOMAS and BROWN, JJ., concur.

Dickinson v. City of Huntsville

822 So. 2d 411 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Nov 21, 2001

Dickinson argues that the City, through the mayor, was liable for Kennedy's presentation of inaccurate information at the personnel board hearing. … Moore, C.J., and Brown, Harwood, and Stuart, JJ., concur. 1 Kennedy conducted surveillance on Dickinson from August 1996 until January 1998.

American Refrigerating & Construction Co. v. Linn

93 Ala. 610 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Nov 15, 1890

Co. v. Woods, 88 Ala. 630 , we laid down certain rules which, it is claimed, require the injunction to be retained in this case. … Co. v. Wood.

Blythe v. Enslen

219 Ala. 638 · Supreme Court of Alabama · May 30, 1929

Bank of Bay Minette, 193 Ala. 341, 360 , 69 So. 452 , it was declared unnecessary to determine whether, under all circumstances and in every instance, liquidation must be by the banking board, and that all other methods of … J., and SAYRE and BROWN, JJ., concur.

Nix v. Winter

35 Ala. 309 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jun 15, 1859

The decision in Brown k Bimmock v. … The principle settled in McLane & Plowman v.

Ala. Great Southern Ry. Co. v. Guest

144 Ala. 373 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Dec 21, 1905

Co. v. Meadors, 95 Ala. 137 , 10 South. 141 ; L. & N. R. R. Co. v. Webb, 97 Ala. 308 , 12 South. 374 ; L. & N. R. R. Co. v. Anchors, 114 Ala. 492 , 22 South. 279 , 62 Am. St. Rep. 116 ; M. & C. R. R. Co. v. … Co. v. Brown, 121 Ala. 221 , 25 South. 609 .

Pace v. Smith

137 Ala. 511 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Nov 15, 1902

The case, therefore, is governed by the principles leclared in Brown v. Burnam, 99 Ala. 114 , and cases there-cited. Affirmed.

Boros v. Baxley

621 So. 2d 240 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Feb 26, 1993

See, Rule 50(a), Ala.R.Civ.P.; Alabama Power Co. v. Williams , 570 So.2d 589 (Ala. 1990); John R. Cowley Bros., Inc. v. Brown , 569 So.2d 375 , 376 (Ala. 1990); J. Hoffman S. Guin, Alabama Civil Procedure § 8.37 (1990). … Hartman v. Board of Trustees of the Univ. of Alabama , 436 So.2d 837 , 841 (Ala. 1983); Matter of Sheffield , 465 So.2d 350 , 357 (Ala. 1984). We have examined closely each of the remarks made by the trial court.

Summerhill v. Craft

425 So. 2d 1055 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Nov 19, 1982

Stiles v. Brown , 380 So.2d 792 , 796 (Ala. 1980). This presumption is rebuttable, but the mere fact that a will contestant had access to the will after the testatrix's death is not enough to overcome the presumption. … .; Lovell v. Lovell , 272 Ala. 409 , 132 So.2d 382 (1961). In Stiles v.

State v. Golden

283 Ala. 706 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Mar 13, 1969

In Denson v. … Citing State v.

Turbeville v. Mobile Light R. Co.

221 Ala. 91 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Mar 13, 1930

*93 BROWN, J. … Plaintiff’s intestate boarded defendant’s outbound car, in charge of Gene Touart as motorman and J. C.