Case law

Morgan Plan Co. v. Beverly

255 Ala. 235 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Mar 1, 1951

BROWN, Justice. Petition of Morgan Plan Company, Inc., for certiorari to the Court of Appeals to review and revise the judgment and decision of that Court in the case of Morgan Plan Co., Inc., v. … Allen v. State, 249 Ala. 201 , 30 So.2d 483 ; Commercial Inv. Trust, Inc., v. East, 217. Ala. 626, 117 So. 160 ; Code of 1940, Title. 7, p. 133 (1949 Pocket Part). The motion is therefore denied. LIVINGSTON, C.

Rambo v. State

134 Ala. 71 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Nov 15, 1901

The difference was pointed out in Adams v. The State, 133 Ala. 166 ; 31 So. Rep. 851 . … Code; Morris v. The State, 97 Ala. 82 ; Allen v. The State, 58 Ala. 98 ; Thomas v. The State, 91 Ala. 34 ; Brown v. The State, 120 Ala. 432 .

Pound v. Gaulding

237 Ala. 387 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Mar 16, 1939

Brown, 234 U.S. 542 , 34 S.Ct. 955 , 58 L.Ed. 1457 . … Industrial Acc’t Board, 87 Mont. 191 , 286 P. 408 ; Employers’ Liability Assur. Corp. v. Dileo, Mass., 10 N.E.2d 251 . The Texas court in Texas Employers’ Ins. Ass’n v.

Waller v. Mastin

220 Ala. 479 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jan 23, 1930

Stewart, 109 Ala. 566 , 75 So. 1 ; Hemphill v. Moody, 64 Ala. 468 ; Trapp & Hill v. Moore & Border, 21 Ala. 693 ; Larkins v. Biddle, 21 Ala. 252 ; Page v. Whatley, 162 Ala. 473 , 50 So. 116 ; Hataway v. … X, and SAYRE and BROWN, JJ., concur.

Johnson v. State

223 Ala. 332 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jun 25, 1931

BROWN, J. In Provo v. … Prince v. State, 100 Ala. 144 , 14 So. 409 , 410, 46 Am. St. Rep. 28 ; Hatch v. State, 144 Ala. 50 , 40 So. 113 .

Ex Parte Woodward

859 So. 2d 425 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Mar 21, 2003

against him in his individual capacity. [4] Parker v. … Parker v. Amerson, 519 So.2d 442, 442-43 (Ala. 1987).

Williams v. State

83 Ala. 68 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Dec 15, 1887

Harrison v. State, 37 Ala. 154 ; Lancaster v. State, 53 Ala. 398 ; Golding v. State, 82 Ala. 48 . 2. … The court did not err in refusing to permit counsel, in the course of his argument, to read to the jury the facts as reported in Brown v. State, 46 Ala. 176 .

Walker v. Jones

250 Ala. 396 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Mar 25, 1948

Gary for certiorari to the Court of Appeals to review and revise the judgment and decision of that Court in the case of Walker et al. v. Jones, 34 So.2d 608 . Writ denied. GARDNER, C. … J., and BROWN and SIMPSON, JJ., concur.

Public Relations Counsel, Inc. v. City of Mobile

381 So. 2d 15 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Feb 8, 1980

In Brock v. … In Southern Railway Co. v.

South & North Ala. R. R. v. State

193 Ala. 149 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jun 18, 1915

Jackson County, 65 Ala. 142 ; State v. Board of Revenue, etc., 73 Ala. 65 ; N. & D. R. R. Co. v. State, 129 Ala. 142 , 39 South. 619 . … Auditor v.

Mikell v. State

242 Ala. 298 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Nov 6, 1941

It was pointed out in Brown v. … Counsel for defendant in brief quote from Brown v.

Parr v. City of Birmingham

264 Ala. 224 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Dec 22, 1955

In our recent case of City of Bay Minette v. … See also Williams v.

State Ex Rel. Riley v. Lorillard Tobacco Co.

1 So. 3d 1 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Mar 28, 2008

Reynolds Tobacco Company, Inc., Lorillard Tobacco Company, Inc., and Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corporation. … State Board of Equalization, 162 Cal.App.3d 1182, 1188 , 208 Cal.Rptr. 837, 840 (1984)). “Additionally, this Court will interpret the terms of a contract to give ‘effect to all terms used.’” Medical Servs., LLC v.

Allstate Insurance Co. v. Amerisure Insurance Companies

603 So. 2d 961 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Aug 7, 1992

Co. v. Foremost Ins. … The automobile was involved in an accident with an automobile driven by Brown. Brantley settled his claim against Brown for the limits of Brown’s automobile insurance policy.

Knight v. State

241 Ala. 152 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Apr 17, 1941

Knight for certiorari to the Court of Appeals to review and revise the judgment and decision of that Court in the case of Knight v. State, I So.2d 668. Writ denied. THOMAS, BROWN, and FOSTER, JJ. concur.

Stewart v. Capital Fertilizer Co.

207 Ala. 596 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jun 1, 1922

Dunklin v. Wilson, 64 Ala. 162 ; Brown v. Turner, 11 Ala. 752 . This rule does not. of course, preclude the sheriff from amending his return in proper cases so as to make it speak the truth. … Thompson v. U. S. Guano Co., 202 Ala. 327 , 80 South. 409 ;. Brown v. Chemical Co. (Ala.

Dollins & Adams v. Pollock & Co.

89 Ala. 351 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Nov 15, 1889

Dig. 162, §§ 108, 113; Clapp v. Bell, 4 Mass. 99; Suydam v. Huggeford, 23 Pick. 465 ; Franklin Bank v. Bachelder, 39 Amer. Dec. 609, note. *360 In Brown v. Harris, 2 G. Greene, 505; s. c., 52 Amer. … In Harrow v. Lyon, 3 G. Greene, 157, the case of Brown v. Harris was followed, the same judge delivering the opinion. These decisions were rendered in 1850, 1851. In the case of Danforth v.

Couch v. Rodgers

257 Ala. 560 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jun 30, 1952

Pioneer Lumber Co., 207 Ala. 522 , 93 So. 427 ; Wallace v. Screws, 225 Ala. 187 , 142 So. 572 ; Gladden v. Columbiana Sav. Bank, 235 Ala. 541 , 180 So. 548 ; Biddle v. … BROWN, LAWSON and STALELY, JJ., concur.

Reaves v. Garrett's Adm'r

34 Ala. 558 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jun 15, 1859

The adjudged cases would not justify the implication of an election from such facts as are before us. — Wake v. Wake, 3 Brown’s C. C. 255; Hall v. Hall, 2 McCord’s Ch. 280; Driscoll v. Koger, 2 Des. 295 ; Upshaw v. … Hayne, Cheves, 41; Leonard v. Crommelin, 1 Edw. Ch. 207 ; Butrick v. Brodhurst, 3 Brown’s Ch. 88; Upshaw v. Upshaw, 2 H. & M. 390; Stark v. Hunton, 1 Sax. Ch. 227. [3.] The agreement of Mrs.

Boyd v. Martin

10 Ala. 700 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jun 15, 1846

[Eccleston v. Clipsham, 1 Saund. 153, in note; Brown on Actions at Law, 116 ; 1 Chitty’s P. 2, 11.] … The case of Gayle v.