Case law

Mobile County v. Maddox

195 Ala. 336 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Nov 4, 1915

. — Lee County v. … v.

Ex Parte Crestwood Hosp. & Nursing Home, Inc.

670 So. 2d 45 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Sep 8, 1995

This is because an administrative board or agency is purely a creature of the legislature, and has only those powers conferred upon it by its creator. Woodruff v. Beeland, 220 Ala. 652 , 127 So. 235 (1930)." … Alabama State Milk Control Board v. Graham, 250 Ala. 49 , 33 So.2d 11, 14 (1947).

Murray v. Fowler

205 Ala. 597 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Apr 21, 1921

Zimmerman v. Dunn, *598 151 Ala. 435 , 44 South. 533 ; Lowery v. … Payne v. Crawford, 102 Ala. 387, 397, 398 , 14 South. 854 ; Driver v. King, 145 Ala. 585 , 40 South. 315 . [6] The witness Jones testified that— “He did not know where the line between Mrs.

Drummond v. Franck

252 Ala. 474 · Supreme Court of Alabama · May 19, 1949

Shahan v. Brown, 179 Ala. 425 , 60 So. 891 , 43 L.R.A.,N.S., 792. … Shahan v. Brown, supra.

Rufus v. State

117 Ala. 131 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Nov 15, 1897

. — Johnson v. State, 69 Ala. 253 ; Page v. State, 69 Ala. 229 ; Brown v. State, 74 Ala. 42 . Affirmed,

Barton v. Fitzpatrick

187 Ala. 273 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Feb 12, 1914

A majority of the board of deacons, some of whom had been placed upon the board by questionable means, adhered to Fitzpatrick, so that those members of the congregation opposed to him found it hard to get the question at … —Morris Street Church v. Dart, 67 S. C. 338, 45 S. E. 753 , 100 Am. St. Rep. 727 ; State v. Bibb Street Church, 84 Ala. 23 , 4 South. 40 .

Moseley v. Neville

221 Ala. 429 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Apr 17, 1930

Rep. 110 ; Fuller v. American Supply Co., 185 Ala. 512 , 64 So. 5491 Mullins v. Baker, supra. … Ex parte Greshem, 82 Ala. 363 , 2 So. 486 : Cox v. Brown, 198 Ala. 641 , 73 So. 964 . And that, when a rehearing is granted, the cause stands as if no decree had been rendered. Cox v. Brown, supra.

Reynolds v. Reynolds

15 Ala. 398 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jan 15, 1849

Rep, 326; Brown v. Warnock, 5 Dana’s Rep. 492; Huff v. Parker, 4 Dall. Rep. 285 ; Gomez v. Garr, 6 Wend. Rep. 583 ; Id. 9 Wend. Rep. 649 ; Young v. Shook, 4 Rawle’s Rep. 299; Banks v. Adams, 10 Shep. Rep. 259. … Brown v. Warnock, 5 Dana’s Rep. 492. And an award for “the amount of the note” in controversy, has been held not obnoxious to the objection of uncertainty. Coxe v. Gent, 1 McMullen’s Rep. 302.

Blount v. Hawkins

19 Ala. 100 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jan 15, 1851

. — McKenzie v. Jackson, 4 Ala. 230 ; Brown v. Barnes, 6 Ala. 604 ; Leonard v. Vrendenbergh, 8 Johns. 23 ; 10 Johns. 412 ; Nelson v. Boynton, 3 Metc. 396 , and the cases there cited.

McCollum v. Birmingham Post Co.

259 Ala. 97 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Mar 13, 1953

This appeal presents the identical questions this day decided in McCollum v. Birmingham Post Company, 1 65 So.2d 689 . … J., and BROWN, SIMPSON, STAKELY, GOODWYN, and MERRILL, JJ., concur. . Ante, p. 88.

Indian Rivers Community Health Center v. City of Tuscaloosa

443 So. 2d 894 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Dec 22, 1983

Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co. , 272 U.S. 365 , 47 S.Ct. 114 , 71 L.Ed. 303 (1926); Woodard v. City of Decatur , 431 So.2d 1173 (Ala. 1983); COME v. Chancy , 289 Ala. 555 , 269 So.2d 88 (1972). … This Court, in Leary v. Adams , 226 Ala. 472 , 147 So. 391 (1933), discussed Village of Euclid v.

Ancora Corp. v. Miller Oil Purchasing Co.

396 So. 2d 672 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jan 30, 1981

Co. v. Moore, 349 So.2d 1113,1115 (Ala.1977); Dominey v. Mathison, 292 Ala. 293, 295 , 293 So.2d 472 (1974); Suggs v. … Beard v. Horton, 86 Ala. 202 , 5 So. 207 , 208 (1889); Walker v. Smith, 28 Ala. 569 (1856).

Henry v. Hartsfield

207 Ala. 485 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Mar 3, 1922

V. Henry, as the treasurer of Jefferson county, for $500, the amount of a warrant issued by the board of revenue for his salary for January, 1922. … Ravanaugh v. State, 41 Ala. 399 ; Andrews v. State, 78 Ala. 483 ; Gerald v. Walker, 201 Ala. 502 , 78 South. 856 ; Scruggs v. State, 111 Ala. 60 , 20 South. 642 .

Jacksonville Public Service Corp. v. Profile Cotton Mills

236 Ala. 4 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Apr 14, 1938

Forsyth, 216 Ala. 486, 491, 492 , 113 So. 516, 521 , and is stated as follows: “The right to control the election of the board of directors is a right inherent in majority ownership of stock, but the law exacts good faith … J., and BROWN and KNIGHT, JJ., concur. 1 Post, p. 146. 2 235 Ala. 226 .

Kinard Const. Co. v. Building Trades Council

258 Ala. 500 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Mar 13, 1953

But giving full force to the release of the board, supra , the effect is not that the Taft-Hartley Act does not apply. In the case of Montgomery Building and Const. Trades Council v. … Compare, Katz Drug Co. v. Kavner, Mo. Sup., 249 S.W.2d 166 ; National Labor Relations Board v. Denver Building and Construction Trades Council, 341 U.S. 675 , 71 S.Ct. 943 , 95 L.Ed. 1284 .

Lehigh Portland Cement Co. v. Higginbotham

232 Ala. 235 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Mar 19, 1936

*236 BROWN, Justice. The several counts of the complaint on which the case was submitted to the jury are in case. … Southern Railway Co. v. Hanby, 166 Ala. 641 , 52 So. 334 .

Lackland v. Rogers

113 Ala. 529 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Nov 15, 1896

-Sherry v. Brown, 66 Ala. 51 ; Toenes v. Moog, 78 Ala. 558 . The claim of homestead exemption was not made in this case until long after the order of sale had been entered by the circuit court.

Kilgore v. Gamble

253 Ala. 365 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Mar 2, 1950

The allegations of the bill are in material substance similar to those in Kilgore v. Gamble, ante, p. 334, 44 So.2d 767 . … BROWN, FOSTER, LAWSON and STAKELY, JJ., concur.

Crum v. Williams

29 Ala. 446 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jun 15, 1856

.” — Brown v. Beason, 24 Ala. R. 467; Williams v. Crum, 27 Ala. R. 468.

Delaney's, Inc. v. State

682 So. 2d 44 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jul 19, 1996

State v. Delaney’s, Inc., 668 So.2d 768 (Ala.Civ.App.1995). See § 40-7-25.1, Ala.Code 1975, regarding current use valuation. On remand from the Court of Civil Appeals, Roberts renewed her demand for a jury trial. … Section 40-3-25, Ala.Code 1975, provides, in pertinent part: “All appeals from the rulings of the board of equalization fixing value of property shall be taken within 30 days after the final decision of said board fixing