Case law

Come v. Chancy

289 Ala. 555 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Dec 21, 1972

In Waters v. … As we stated in Grayson v.

Indian Rivers Community Health Center v. City of Tuscaloosa

443 So. 2d 894 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Dec 22, 1983

Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co. , 272 U.S. 365 , 47 S.Ct. 114 , 71 L.Ed. 303 (1926); Woodard v. City of Decatur , 431 So.2d 1173 (Ala. 1983); COME v. Chancy , 289 Ala. 555 , 269 So.2d 88 (1972). … This Court, in Leary v. Adams , 226 Ala. 472 , 147 So. 391 (1933), discussed Village of Euclid v.

BENEFICIAL MANAGEMENT CORP., ETC. v. Evans

421 So. 2d 92 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Aug 27, 1982

Bryan v. Brown , 339 So.2d 577 (Ala. 1976). … Co. v. Brown Service Funeral Homes Co. , 277 Ala. 251 , 254 , 168 So.2d 621 (1964).

Wetzel v. Hobbs

249 Ala. 434 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jul 31, 1947

Co. v. Orient Ins. Co., 188 Ala. 218, 224 , 66 So. 434 ; New York Life Ins. Co. v. Mason, 236 Ala. 44 , 180 So. 775 . … J., and BROWN and LIVINGSTON, JJ., concur.

Ex Parte Case

925 So. 2d 956 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Oct 14, 2005

Carroll v. … Board of Comm'rs of the Alabama State Bar v. State ex rel. Baxley , 295 Ala. 100 , 324 So.2d 256 (1975); Simpson v. Alabama State Bar , 294 Ala. 52 , 311 So.2d 307 (1975).

In Re Ashworth

291 Ala. 723 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jan 10, 1974

The Board of Control of the Retirement System through Mr. Charles A. … Moore v. Strickland, 289 Ala. 488 , 268 So.2d 766 . *727 If there is a conflict in the provisions of the same Act, the last provision in point of arrangement must control. Wilkins v. Woolf, 281 Ala. 693 , 208 So.2d 74 .

Ex Parte Cook

544 So. 2d 167 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Mar 10, 1989

such reallocation had the effect of conflicting with the pertinent provisions of United States v. … The court based its reversal on this Court's case of Stuart v.

McLeod v. Turner

230 Ala. 673 · Supreme Court of Alabama · May 9, 1935

Lynne v. Gurley et al., 217 Ala. 666 , 117 So. 297 ; Sherrod v. McGruder, 209 Ala. 260 , 96 So. 78 ; Louisville & Nashville R. R. Co. v. Shikle, 206 Ala. 494 , 90 So. 900 ; Chandler v. … J., and THOMAS and BROWN, JJ., concur.

Louisville & N. R. Co. v. Camody

203 Ala. 522 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Dec 18, 1919

Powell v. Robinson & Ledyard, 76 Ala. 423 . … McCLELLAN and BROWN, JJ., not sitting.

Roach v. Bynum

437 So. 2d 69 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jul 1, 1983

See, Roach v. Bynum , 403 So.2d 187 (Ala. 1981), and Ex parte Roach , 414 So.2d 80 (Ala. 1982). … In Roach v.

Barrington v. Barrington

200 Ala. 315 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Feb 15, 1917

The employment of that tense “expresses what has taken place, within some period of time not fully past, as T have seen him to-day.’ ” Brown’s Grammar, etc., 340. … Co. v.

Howard v. State Ex Rel. McGarry

226 Ala. 215 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jan 26, 1933

In a sense the statute was remedial (Miller-Brent Lumber Co. v. State et al., 210 Ala. 30 , 97 So. 97 ; Lehmann v. State Board of Public Accountancy et al., 208 Ala. 185 , 94 So. 94 ; Folsom v. … BROWN, J., concurs for reasons stated below.

McCay v. Big Town, Inc.

293 Ala. 582 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Feb 6, 1975

Baker v. Wheeler, Lacey & Brown, Inc., 272 Ala. 101 , 128 So.2d 721 ; Wheeler, Lacey & Brown, Inc. v. Baker, 269 Ala. 293 , 112 So.2d 461 ; Life & Casualty Ins. Co. of Tennessee v. … No. 57 v.

American Nat. Ins. Co. v. Rains

215 Ala. 378 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Dec 2, 1926

National Order, etc., Templars v. Lile, 200 Ala. 508 , 76 So. 450 ; Dominick v. Randolph, 124 Ala. 552, 553, 557 , 27 So. 481 ; Fountain v. Brown, 38 Ala. 72 ; Barker v. Coleman, 35 Ala. 221 ; Wilkinson v. … Mosley, 30 Ala. 562 ; Bennett v. Fail, 26 Ala. 605 ; Milton v. Rowland, 11 Ala. 732 .

Citizens & Southern Factors, Inc. v. Small Business Administration

375 So. 2d 251 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Sep 7, 1979

The certification opinion follows: CITIZENS AND SOUTHERN FACTORS , INC., Plaintiff-Appellant , v. The SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION , an Agency of the United States, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 77-1628. … Before BROWN, Chief Judge, COLEMAN and TJOFLAT, Circuit Judges.

Public Relations Counsel, Inc. v. City of Mobile

381 So. 2d 15 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Feb 8, 1980

In Brock v. … In Southern Railway Co. v.

Ellis v. Stickney

253 Ala. 86 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Oct 6, 1949

, Jr.,, 80/8640, subject to the life interest of respondent Joseph Brown, Sr.; (7) James. … BROWN, FOSTER and SIMPSON, JJ., concur.

Grissom v. State

249 Ala. 125 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Apr 17, 1947

Petition of Lula, alias Lula Adell, Grissom for certiorari to the Court of Appeals to review and' revise the judgment and decision of that Court in the case of Grissom v. State, 30 So.2d 19 . Writ denied. GARDNER, C. … J., and BROWN and LIVINGSTON, JJ., concur.

Mann Lumber Co. v. Bailey Iron Works

156 Ala. 598 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jul 3, 1908

If the engine levied upon was not liable to the attachment because the plaintiff had no lien upon it for the repairs, the proper remedy was “a motion in the court beloAV to dissolve the attachment. — Brown v. … . — Brown v. Coats, 56 Ala. 439 ; Watson v. Auerbach, supra; Giddens v. Bolling, 93 Ala. 92 , 9 South. 427 .

Lanier v. City of Newton

518 So. 2d 40 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Sep 18, 1987

Plump v. City of Birmingham , supra; Smith v. Town of Notasulga , [ 257 Ala. 382 , 59 So.2d 674 (1952)]; City of Birmingham v. West , 236 Ala. 434 , 183 So. 421 (1938)." … This ordinance is not repugnant or contradictory to the Board's regulation. The ordinance does not in any way abrogate or abandon the regulation. Gadsden Motor Co. v. City of Attalla, supra.