Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersala

10,000+ results

0.49s

  • Trapp v. State ex rel. Thompson

    117 Ala. 227 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Nov 15, 1897

    on the treasurer for the payment of bills of costs, otherwise correct and within the limit of one hundred and fifty 'dollars, containing such solicitor’s fees. — Acts, 1896-97, p. 1532; Ex parte Lusk, 82 Ala. 519 ; Hogue v. … The judgment of the city court awarding mandamus to the President of the Board of Convict Inspectors must, therefore, be affirmed. Affirmed.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Montgomery v. Spears

    218 Ala. 160 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jun 30, 1928

    Ray v. Farrow, 211 Ala. 445 , 100 So. 868 ; Kidd v. Browne, 200 Ala. 299 , 76 So. 65 . In 1908 Theodosia Little conveyed the property to Carrie L. … Moxon, 167 Ala. 615 , 52 So. 527 ; Kidd v. Browne, 200 Ala. 299 , 76 So. 65 ; Stiff v. Cobb, 126 Ala. 381 , 28 So. 402 , 85 Am. St. Rep. 38 . This is not to be treated as “wild land.”

    Cited 22 timesPublished
  • Lanier v. City of Newton

    518 So. 2d 40 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Sep 18, 1987

    Plump v. City of Birmingham , supra; Smith v. Town of Notasulga , [ 257 Ala. 382 , 59 So.2d 674 (1952)]; City of Birmingham v. West , 236 Ala. 434 , 183 So. 421 (1938)." … This ordinance is not repugnant or contradictory to the Board's regulation. The ordinance does not in any way abrogate or abandon the regulation. Gadsden Motor Co. v. City of Attalla, supra.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Terrell v. Branch Bank at Mobile

    12 Ala. 502 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jun 15, 1847

    In Lucas v. … In the Washington Bank v. Lewis, 22 Pick.

    Cited 23 timesPublished
  • Davis v. State

    283 Ala. 686 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Mar 6, 1969

    In Berry v. … In the recent case of King v.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Gentry v. Swann Chemical Co.

    234 Ala. 313 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Apr 8, 1937

    BROWN, Justice. This is a common-law action on the case, by the servant against the master, to recover damages for personal injury. … Wood v. Coman et al., 56 Ala. 283 ; Alston v. Marengo County Board of Education et al., 224 Ala. 676 , 141 So. 658 .

    Cited 73 timesPublished
  • Brock v. Stimpson

    253 Ala. 138 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Dec 1, 1949

    Riddle v. Adams, supra; Mutual Savings Life Ins. Co. v. Osborne, 30 Ala. App. 399 , 7 So.2d 314 . … BROWN, FOSTER, and LIVINGSTON, JJ., concur.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Mann Lumber Co. v. Bailey Iron Works

    156 Ala. 598 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jul 3, 1908

    If the engine levied upon was not liable to the attachment because the plaintiff had no lien upon it for the repairs, the proper remedy was “a motion in the court beloAV to dissolve the attachment. — Brown v. … . — Brown v. Coats, 56 Ala. 439 ; Watson v. Auerbach, supra; Giddens v. Bolling, 93 Ala. 92 , 9 South. 427 .

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Wells v. State

    147 Ala. 140 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jun 6, 1906

    . — Hayes v. State, 107 Ala. 1 , 18 South. 172 ; Ned v. State, 7 Port. 187 ; Cook v. State, 60 Ala. 39 , 31 Am. Rep. 31 . … . — Brown v. State. 63 Ala. 97 .

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Ball v. Bank of Alabama

    8 Ala. 590 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jun 15, 1845

    From this view it results, that the Circuit Court rightly excluded Brown as a witness, upon the propositions of the defendant’s counsel. … Bank of Columbus v. Whitehead, 4 Ala. Rep. 637 .] The facts recited in the bill of exceptions very clearly show, that the defendant and Brown occupied that relation to each other. 4.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Middleton v. General Water Works & Electric Corp.

    227 Ala. 219 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jun 29, 1933

    Middleton v. General Water Works and Electric Corp., 25 Ala. App. 455 , 149 So. 351 . Writ denied. All the Justices concur, except BROWN, J., not sitting.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • State, Ex Rel. Abernathy v. City of Sheffield

    428 So. 2d 5 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Sep 17, 1982

    Jeter v. State ex rel. Carlisle, 218 Ala. 12 , 117 So. 460 (1928); State ex rel. Denson v. Miller, 204 Ala. 234 , 85 So. 700 (1920). … See, e.g., Corte v. State, 259 Ala. 536 , 67 So.2d 782 (1953); Knighton v. Knighton, 252 Ala. 520 , 41 So.2d 172 (1949).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Ex Parte Cook

    544 So. 2d 167 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Mar 10, 1989

    such reallocation had the effect of conflicting with the pertinent provisions of United States v. … The court based its reversal on this Court's case of Stuart v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Kolb v. Swann Chemical Corporation

    245 Ala. 438 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Mar 30, 1944

    Yates et al., 196 Ala. 657 , 72 So. 260 ; Ex parte Doak, 188 Ala. 406 , 66 So. 64 ; Ex parte Gay, 213 Ala. 5 , 104 So. 898 ; Brown v. Brown, 213 Ala. 339 , 105 So. 171 ; Gibson v. … Talladega Mercantile Co. v. McDonald, supra; Thompson v. Hill Grocery Co., 236 Ala. 66 , 181 So. 272 ; Garaca v.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • BROOKFIELD CONST. CO. v. Van Wezel

    841 So. 2d 220 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jun 28, 2002

    Brown v. … HOUSTON, LYONS, BROWN, JOHNSTONE, HARWOOD, and STUART, JJ., concur. MOORE, C.J., concurs in the result.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • International Harvester Co. v. Williams

    222 Ala. 595 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Mar 12, 1931

    BROWN, J. Affirmed on authority of International Harvester Co. et al. v. Elgin Williams, ante, p. 589, 133 So. 270 . ANDERSON, O. J., and SAYRE and THOMAS, JJ., concur.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Ex Parte Pardue

    661 So. 2d 268 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Sep 2, 1994

    Stewart said that Pardue told him that they left the motel in a stolen pick-up truck and went to Baldwin County to meet John Brown. … Theresa Lanier testified that Pardue did not shoot Rider but that he had handed the gun to Brown while Rider was opening the safe and that Brown shot Rider.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Sparks v. Parker

    368 So. 2d 528 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Feb 9, 1979

    Reinforcing this view of the lawyer's obligation to represent indigent defendants is the unique position of the Alabama Bar Association and the Board of Bar Commissioners as this Court pointed out in Wright v. … "This dependency was underscored in the opinion authored for the Court by Justice Shores in Board of Commissioners, Alabama State Bar v. State ex rel.

    Cited 49 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.