Case law

Tuscaloosa Manufacturing Co. v. Cox

68 Ala. 71 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Dec 15, 1880

The by-laws of the corporation require a meeting of the board of directors to be called whenever two members of the board request it. … —Dodge v. Woolsey, 18 How. U. S. 331; French v. Gifford, 30 Iowa, 148 ; Robinson v. Smith, 3 Paige 222 ; Cross v. Sackett, 16 How. Pr. 62 ; Atty. Gen’l v. Wilson, 1 Cr. & Phil. 1; Wright v.

Ex Parte Regions Bank

914 So. 2d 843 · Supreme Court of Alabama · May 27, 2005

The Bond Issues The essence of Blount's argument under this category is as follows: "[V]irtually all of the representation [by] Sellers had to do with bond issues involving the [Board] and related agencies, the structure … District Court, Middle District of Alabama, *Page 851 styled Southern Agcom, Inc. v.

In re: The Estate of Charles E. Milner, by and through its Administrator, Mary E. Milner v. Community Health Systems Professional Services Corporation, LLC d/b/a Grandview Medical Center

Supreme Court of Alabama · Mar 6, 2026

Patterson v. … Brown & Flowers v. Central of Georgia Ry., 197 Ala. 71, 75, 72 So. 366, 367 (1916).

Barrington v. Barrington

200 Ala. 315 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Feb 15, 1917

The employment of that tense “expresses what has taken place, within some period of time not fully past, as T have seen him to-day.’ ” Brown’s Grammar, etc., 340. … Co. v.

McNairy v. Sugar Creek Resort, Inc.

576 So. 2d 185 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Feb 1, 1991

Section 34-8-2 requires McNairy to have a license from the State Contracting Board. … See Aim Leasing Corp. v. Helicopter Medical Evacuation, Inc. , 687 F.2d 354 (11th Cir. 1982); Montgomery Traction Co. v.

Pierce v. City of Huntsville

185 Ala. 490 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Nov 27, 1913

In Garner v. … . — Hibben v. Smith, 191 U. S. 310 , 21 Sup. Ct. 88, 48 L. Ed. 195 ; Lent v. Tillson, 110 U. S. 316 , 11 Sup. 825, 35 L. Ed. 119 .

Parker v. Hayes Lumber Co.

221 Ala. 73 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Mar 13, 1930

As was said in Batson v. … X, and THOMAS and BROWN, JJ.,' concur.

Hawkins v. Roberts & Son

122 Ala. 130 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Nov 15, 1898

In Perkins v. … S. 27 ; Tinsley v. Anderson, 171 U. S. 101 ; Watson v. Nevin, 128 U. S. 578 ; Hays v. Missouri, 120 U. S. 68 .

Einstein, Hirsch & Co. v. Marshall

58 Ala. 153 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Dec 15, 1877

The known misrepresentation and its consequences consummate the fraud.— Foster v. Charles, 6 Bing. 396; Gorbet v. Brown, 8 Bing. 433; Polhill v. Walter, 3 B. & Adol. 122; Pontifex v. Rignold, 3 Scott, N. R. 390. … In the case of Boyd v. Brown, 6 Penn.

Bonds v. Bonds

234 Ala. 522 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jun 14, 1937

Hodge v. Joy, 207 Ala. 198 , 92 So. 171 ; Casey v. Cooledge and Macuk (Ala.Sup.) 175 So. 557 ; 1 Andrews v. Grey, 199 Ala. 152 , 74 So. 62 ; Howell v. City of Dothan, ante, p. 158, 174 So. 624 ; Wood v. … J., and BROWN and KNIGHT, JJ., concur. 1 Ante, p. 499.

City Bank of Alabama v. Eskridge

521 So. 2d 931 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Feb 5, 1988

Hammond v. City of Gadsden , 493 So.2d 1374 , 1378 (Ala. 1986). … Ridout's-Brown Service, Inc. v. Holloway , 397 So.2d 125 (Ala. 1981), citing Vest v. Gay , 275 Ala. 286 , 154 So.2d 297 (1963).

Rushing v. Alabama Nat. Bank

226 Ala. 621 · Supreme Court of Alabama · May 18, 1933

National Surety Co. v. State, 219 Ala. 609, 610 , 123 So. 202, 205 . That case involved a county treasurer of public school funds as the law then stood. … This is further indicated in that the present statute omits the provision of the statute considered in National Surety Co. v.

Town of Opp v. Donaldson

230 Ala. 689 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jun 27, 1935

See, also, In re Opinion of the Justices, 228 Ala. 140 , 152 So. 901 ; Oppenheim v. City of Florence, 229 Ala. 50 , 155 So. 859 ; Bankhead v. Town of Sulligent, 229 Ala. 45 , 155 So. 869 , 96 A. L. R. 1381; Smith v. … J., and BOULDIN, BROWN, and FOSTER, JJ., concur. GARDNER and THOMAS, JJ., dissent. KNIGHT,- J., not sitting.

McNutt v. State

219 Ala. 116 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Mar 28, 1929

Petition of the state of Alabama for certiorari to the Court of Appeals to review and revise the judgment and decision of that court in McNutt v. State, 121 So. 432 . Writ denied. ANDERSON, C. … J., and SAYRE, THOMAS, and BROWN, JJ., concur.

Jefferson Cty. Com'n v. Eco Preserv. Serv., LLC

788 So. 2d 121 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Dec 15, 2000

They cite Robinson v. … While the county commission does have general superintendence authority over public roads, see Water Works & Sewer Board of the City of Birmingham v. Shelby County, 624 So.2d 1047, 1050 (Ala.1993), and Barber v.

Ex Parte Pierce

851 So. 2d 618 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Sep 20, 2002

Pierce v. State , 586 So.2d 1005 (Ala.Crim.App. 1991). … Pierce v. State , 612 So.2d 514 (Ala.Crim.App. 1992).

Town of La Fayette v. Williams

232 Ala. 502 · Supreme Court of Alabama · May 21, 1936

municipality and asked him to see the other members of the town council and see if they would agree to .vote for a resolution to rescind the former action' and invest these funds in school tax warrants issued by the county board … BROWN, J., limits his concurrence to the result only.

Amberson v. Patterson

227 Ala. 397 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Oct 12, 1933

Parra v. Cooper, 213 Ala. 340 , 104 So. 827 ; Cudd v. Wood, 205 Ala. 682 , 89 So. 52 ; Bennett v. Brown, 219 Ala. 414 , 122 So. 414 ; O’Rear v. O’Rear, 219 Ala. 419 , 122 So. 645 ; Waller v. … J., and BROWN and KNIGHT, JJ., concur.

Cunningham v. Etowah Quality of Life Council

484 So. 2d 1075 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Feb 7, 1986

In Mathis v. … In Elgin v.

Blevins v. State

204 Ala. 476 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jun 30, 1920

Maxwell v. … The questions of fact involved, as we have already indicated, were for the jury; the applicable law is stated in Brown v.