Case law

City of Tuscaloosa v. Marcum

283 Ala. 440 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jan 23, 1969

As noted by the Supreme Court of Arizona, in Taylor v. … Green v.

Ex Parte Bush

474 So. 2d 168 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jul 12, 1985

See Estes v. State , 358 So.2d 1050 (Ala.Crim.App.), cert. denied, 358 So.2d 1057 (Ala. 1978). Second, there must be a showing that the test was performed according to methods approved by the State Board of Health. … Parker v. State , 397 So.2d 199 (Ala.Crim.App. 1981), Patton v. City of Decatur , 337 So.2d 321 (Ala. 1976).

McDonald v. Lyle

270 Ala. 715 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jun 30, 1960

In 1955, Act No. 84 abolished the Highway Board and created in lieu thereof a Board of Revenue. … Sweeney v. Tritsch, 151 Ala. 242 , 44 So. 184 ; Griffin v.

Beech v. State

205 Ala. 342 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jan 15, 1921

Co. v. Friedman, 187 Ala. 567 , 67 South. 939 ; Cowart v. State, 16 Ala. App. 119 , 75 South. 711 . The result is that the judgment must be affirmed. Affirmed. ANDERSON, C. … BROWN, J., dissents. GARDNER, J., not sitting. 1 Ante, p. 216.

Moulton v. Reid

54 Ala. 320 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Dec 15, 1875

—Cochr an v. McLeary, 22 Iowa, 75 ; Detroit v. Board of Public Works, 23 Mich. 546 ; Tappan v. Gray, 9 Paige, 507 ; S. C. 7 Hill, 259 ; People v. Draper, 24 Barb. 265 ; Undergraft v. Craus, 47 Penn. 103 ; Mickles v. … Where positive law in point of fact injures, it is tbe legislature which must furnish tbe corrective; courts cannot.” — Brown’s Appeal, 66 Penn. 157 .

Morrow v. Shuff

219 Ala. 395 · Supreme Court of Alabama · May 23, 1929

Bluthenthal & Bickart v. Columbia, 175 Ala. 401 , 57 So. 814 ; Brown v. Bank, 103 Ala. 123 , 15 So. 435 . … THOMAS and BROWN, JJ., concur. ■

Decatur Mineral Land Co. v. Palm

113 Ala. 531 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Nov 15, 1896

In the case of Tuscaloosa Manufacturing Co. v. … -Porter v. Pittsburg Bessemer Steel Co., 120 U. S. 670 .

Barnett v. Dowdy

207 Ala. 641 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jun 8, 1922

Brown, incorporated in their answer; and from an adverse decree these respondents appeal. … Brown. Filed March 26, 1921. J. H. Carter, Register." The bill as amended does not show J. G. Barnett and J. W.

Hail v. Regency Terrace Owners Ass'n

782 So. 2d 1271 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Oct 27, 2000

Management of the building was the responsibility of the Association, which is governed by a board of directors and elected officers. … See, also, Calvert v. Casualty Reciprocal Exch. Ins. Co., 523 So.2d 361 (Ala. 1988); Nettles v. Henderson, 510 So.2d 212 (Ala.1987); Wilson v. Brown, 496 So.2d 756 (Ala.1986).

Gray v. Lincoln Industrial Insurance Co., Inc.

295 Ala. 157 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jan 2, 1976

Garrow v. Toxey, 188 Ala. 572 , 66 So. 443 (1914). … Ballentine v. Bradley, supra. This case must be distinguished from Brown v.

Fletcher v. DeLoach

360 So. 2d 316 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jun 30, 1978

Knox, supra , 95 Ala. at 503 -04 , 11 So. at 128 ; Fountain v. Brown , 38 Ala. 72 , 75 (1861). … Fountain v. Brown, supra at 74. This court, in Councill v.

State Ex Rel. Day v. Bowles

217 Ala. 458 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jan 12, 1928

Askew, 172 Ala. 160 , 54 So. 605 ; Board of Revenue v. Kayser, 205 Ala. 289 , 88 So. 19 ; Jackson v. Sherrod, 207 Ala. 245 , 92 So. 481 ; Riley v. State, 209 Ala. 505 , 96 So. 599 ; Polytinsky v. … Board of Revenue v. Parson, 197 Ala. 375 , 72 So. 613 , L. R.

Rudulph v. Brewer

96 Ala. 189 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Nov 15, 1892

In the case of Boit v. … The court ruled properly in refusing to allow the witness Holmes to testify “that Brown [one of the payees of the note], while in the possession of the note, had stated to witness that he, Brown, had tried to sell the note

Health Care Authority for Baptist Health v. Davis

158 So. 3d 397 · Supreme Court of Alabama · May 17, 2013

Thus, the Authority contends, it shares the immunity of its “authorizing subdivision,” the Board. See Cox v. … Co. v. University of Alabama Health Servs. Found., P.C., 881 So.2d 1013 (Ala.2003); Sarradett, supra; and Hutchinson v. Board of Trs. of Univ. of Alabama, 288 Ala. 20 , 256 So.2d 281 (1971). See also White v.

Baker v. Central of Georgia Railway Co.

165 Ala. 466 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Feb 10, 1910

. — Wood v. Brown, 8 Ala. 563 ; Kitchen v. Moye, 17 Ala. 143 ; Haden v. Brown, 22 Ala. 572 ; Markland v. Albes, 81 Ala. 433 , 2 South. 123 ; Bryant v. State, 36 Ala. 270 ; Union Co. v. Mitchell, 37 Ala. 314 ; Bass v. … Glasscock, 86 Ala. 244 , 6 South. 430 ; Ladd’s Case, 92 Ala. 58 , 9 South. 401 ; Rosson v. State, 92 Ala. 76 , 9 South. 357 ; Cooley v. U. S., etc., Ass’n, 132 Ala. 590 , 31 South. 521 ; Driver v.

Shorter v. Urquhart

28 Ala. 360 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jan 15, 1856

Brown, 2 Ala. 127 ; English v. … Roberds, 7 Ala. 719 ; Del Barco v. Br. Bk. at Mobile, 12 Ala. 238 ; Savage v. Walshe, 26 Ala. 619 .

King v. Reid

428 So. 2d 611 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Mar 4, 1983

In Dorough v. … Brown v. Sieber , Ala.Civ.App., 379 So.2d 620 (1980). Thus it must be seen that Mrs. King did possess a statutory homestead exemption even though that homestead had been devised by her husband.

State v. Tuscaloosa County

233 Ala. 611 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Feb 18, 1937

County Board of Education v. Slaughter, 230 Ala. 229, 232 , 160 So. 758 ; Dean v. County Board of Education, 210 Ala. 256 , 97 So. 741 ; Kimmons v. … Jefferson County Board of Education et al., 204 Ala. 384 , 85 So. 774 ; Allred v. Dunn, Tax Collector, 207 Ala. 469 , 93 So. 390 .

Ex Parte Greenberg

395 So. 2d 1000 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jan 9, 1981

Emack to participate as a board member in the hearing against her. In Board of Dental Examiners v. … The United States Supreme Court in Withrow v.

Nance v. Lary

5 Ala. 370 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jun 15, 1843

There, Parsons wrote his name on a piece of paper and gave it to Brown; Brown made a note on the other side, for the payment of money to Sumner; Sumner then wrote a guaranty of the note over Parsons’ signature, and sued him … [Brahan & Atwood v. Ragland, et al. 3 Stew. Rep. 260 ; Roberts v. Adams, 8 Porter’s Rep. 297; Herbert v. Huie, 1 Ala. Rep. N. S. 18.] So Putnam v. Sullivan, [ 4 Mass.