Case law

Hudmon v. Slaughter

70 Ala. 546 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Dec 15, 1881

Lewis v. Commissioners, 22 Amer. Rep. 275 (s. c., 16 Kan. 102 ); Kister v. Cameron, 39 Ind. 488 , supra. In the case of the Attorney-General v. … —State v. State Canvassers, 36 Wis. 498 ; Phelps v. Schroeder, 26 Ohio St. 549 .

Myatt v. Lockhart

13 Ala. 338 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jan 15, 1848

See Hallet and Walker v. O’Brien, 3 Ala. Rep. 455 ; Holman v. Arnet, 4 Por. Rep. 53. This view does not conflict with the principle settled in Scott, Slough & Co. v. … Frow & Ferguson v. Downman, 11 Ala. Rep. 880 ; Brown v. Brown, 5 Ala. Rep. 508 . Judgment reversed.

Courtney v. Alabama State Bar.

492 So. 2d 1002 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jun 20, 1986

Haynes v. Alabama State Bar , 447 So.2d 675 , 677 (Ala. 1984); Trammell v. Disciplinary Board of the Alabama State Bar , 431 So.2d 1168 , 1172 (Ala. 1983). … Disciplinary Board of Alabama State Bar , 424 So.2d 1305 , 1307 (Ala. 1982); Dodd v.

Brasier v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RY. CO., INC.

896 So. 2d 471 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Aug 20, 2004

Phillips v. CSX Transp., Inc. , 190 F.3d 285 , 288 (4th Cir. 1999); Angell v. … NABERS, C.J., and BROWN, HARWOOD, and STUART, JJ., concur. 1 Brasier did not contest Norfolk Southern's motion for a summary judgment as to the negligence claim; therefore, the negligence claim is not before us on appeal.

Ex parte Chesnut

208 So. 3d 624 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jan 22, 2016

Merritt, 167 So.3d 283 (Ala.2013)(same); Board of Zoning Adjustment of Trussville v. … Advertiser Co. v. Hobbie, supra; Morgan County Board of Education v. Alabama Public School & College Authority, 362 So.2d 850 (Ala.1978).

Harrison v. Jones

80 Ala. 412 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Dec 15, 1885

In O'Donnell v. … .” — Shippey v. Eastwood, 9 Ala. 198 ; Milton v. Haden, 32 Ala. 30 ; Woods v. Armstrong, 54 Ala. 150 ; Renfro v. Loyd, 64 Ala. 94 . There is no error in the record. Affirmed.

Unum Life Ins. Co. of America v. Wright

897 So. 2d 1059 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Sep 24, 2004

Vincent v. … Sciences [v. Board of Trustees of Leland Stanford Junior Univ.] , 489 U.S. [468 ] at 471 n. 2, 109 S.Ct. [1248 ] at 1251 n. 2 [ 103 L.Ed.2d 488 ] [(1989)]; Perry v.

State v. Tuscaloosa County

233 Ala. 611 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Feb 18, 1937

County Board of Education v. Slaughter, 230 Ala. 229, 232 , 160 So. 758 ; Dean v. County Board of Education, 210 Ala. 256 , 97 So. 741 ; Kimmons v. … Jefferson County Board of Education et al., 204 Ala. 384 , 85 So. 774 ; Allred v. Dunn, Tax Collector, 207 Ala. 469 , 93 So. 390 .

State Ex Rel. Wright v. Campbell

212 Ala. 493 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Mar 19, 1925

It was so applied in Everts v. Township, etc., supra, to the records of a township board of school directors. … It is of course to be conceded that the recitals of the minutes of the county board are presumed to be true, prima facie, and the burden of disproof is upon him who asserts the contrary. South School District v.

Gotlieb v. Klotzman

369 So. 2d 798 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Apr 20, 1979

The appellants contend that prior to this Court's decisions in McCaleb v. Brown , 344 So.2d 485 (Ala. 1977), Zimmerman v. … The appellants further argue that McCaleb v. Brown, Zimmerman v. First National Bank of Birmingham and Southside Baptist Church v. Drennen should be applied prospectively only.

State v. Southern Railway Co.

115 Ala. 250 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Nov 15, 1896

—Ballentyne v. Wickersham, 75 Ala. 583 ; Ex parte Reynolds, 87 Ala. 138 ; Ex parte Cowert, 92 Ala. 94 ; Woolf v. Taylor, 98 Ala. 254 ; Ex parte Gayles, 108 Ala. 514 . 2. Section 7 of Art. … —Elyton Land Co . v. Mayor, &c., 89 Ala. 477 ; Hare v. Kennerly; 83 Ala. 608 ; Schultes v. Eberly, 82 Ala. 246 .

Torian v. Ashford

216 Ala. 85 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Mar 24, 1927

J., and THOMAS and BROWN, JJ., concur. On Rehearing. … Co. v. Hayes, 198 Ala. 601 , 73 So. 945 . For the reasons stated, the application for rehearing will be overruled. ANDERSON, C. J., and THOMAS and BROWN, JJ., concur.

Alabama High School Athletic Ass'n v. Rose

446 So. 2d 1 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jan 6, 1984

DECISION In Scott v. … See Tennessee Secondary School Athletic Association, et al. v. Cox, et al. , [221] Tenn. [164], 425 S.W.2d 597 ; Morrison v. Roberts , 183 Okla. 359 , 82 P.2d 1023 ; Robinson v.

State Ex Rel. Shirley v. Lutz

226 Ala. 497 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Mar 9, 1933

Vaughan v. State ex rel. Dawson, 212 Ala. 258, 259 , 102 So. 222 ; Ward v. State ex rel. Lea, 224 Ala. 242 , 139 So. 416, 417 ; State ex rel. Ward v. Henry, 224 Ala. 224 , 139 So. 278 ; State ex rel. Camp v. … Board of Revenue of Jefferson County v. Huey, 195 Ala. 83, 91 , 70 So. 744 .

Liao v. Harry's Bar

574 So. 2d 775 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Dec 28, 1990

Martin v. Watts , 513 So.2d 958 (Ala. 1987). Ala. Code 1975, § 28-3-49 (a), states that the rules promulgated by the Alabama Alcoholic Beverage Control Board "have the full force and effect of law." … Brown v. Vanity Fair Mills, Inc. , 291 Ala. 80 , 277 So.2d 893 (1973).

Jefferson County v. City of Birmingham

235 Ala. 199 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jan 13, 1938

and to further provide for and define the rights, powers, duties, procedure, jurisdiction and authority of such cities and of the officers, courts, and bodies thereof, and of the State and county offipers, courts, bodies, boards … Jean v. Sandiford, 39 Ala. 317 . But it is so on the amount of á claim for damages which is measured by an ascertainable standard. Atlanta & B. Ry. v. Brown, 158 Ala. 607, 621 , 48 So. 73 ; Alabama Power Co. v.

White v. Hewlett

143 Ala. 374 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Nov 15, 1904

—Hallifield v. Robbins, 79 Ala. 419, 422 ; Jefferson Publishing Co. v. Hilliard, 105 Ala, 576, 578.” … The power of the board is necessarily exclusive.’ To the same effect is Platter v. The Board of Commissioners, 103 Ind. 360 .

Silvey & Co. v. Cook

191 Ala. 228 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Dec 17, 1914

—Creel v. … Brown to the extent that the statement Avas made by Bain on that occasion. Naturally ,Ayers is an interested witness, and Bain and Brown do not appear biased in the premises.

Bullen v. Bullen

231 Ala. 192 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Nov 7, 1935

Brown v. Roberson, 214 Ala. 18 , 106 So. 181 . In line with the last statement, it was observed by Bouldin, J., in the case of Brown v. Roberson, supra, that: “There must be a memorandum of the ‘property.’ … THOMAS, BROWN, and FOSTER, JJ., concur.

Ex Parte Travis

414 So. 2d 956 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Feb 5, 1982

Hayes v. Kennedy , 292 Ala. 362 , 294 So.2d 739 (1974). The "scintilla" rule applies in these cases. Bonds v. Brown , 368 So.2d 536 (Ala. 1979). IV. … Then, in Winn-Dixie Store No. 1501 v. Brown , 394 So.2d 49 (Ala.Civ.App. 1981), the Court of Civil Appeals reversed a judgment for the plaintiff in a slip-and-fall case.