Case law

Selma Medical Center, Inc. v. Manayan

733 So. 2d 382 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Apr 23, 1999

Sciences, Inc. v. Board of Trustees of Leland Stanford Junior Univ., 489 U.S. 468 , 478 (1989). Whether arbitration applies to a dispute between parties `is to be determined by the contract entered into by the parties.' … Hooper, C.J., and Houston, See, Lyons, and Brown, JJ., concur. Maddox, J., concurs specially.

Waller v. Jones

107 Ala. 331 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Nov 15, 1894

Co. v. Dangain, 103 Ala. 388 . To this we may add the following citations : Spratt v. Wilson, 94 Ala. 608 ; Adams v. Sayre, 76 Ala. 509 , S. C. 70 Ala. 318 ; Pearce v. Gamble, 72 Ala. 341 ; Firestone v. … Brown, (Ala.) 17 So. Rep. 731 . Tlio suit was brought within ten years from the purchase of the tax titles, and ■ within a much shorter time after the repudiation of the trust relation. It was not barred. — Beadle v.

Wheeler v. Wheeler

254 Ala. 611 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Oct 12, 1950

BROWN, Justice. … Pinney, 76 Ala. 291 , 294— 295; Bogacki v. Welch, 94 Ala. 429, 431 , 10 So. 330 ; Brown v. Olsson et al., 252 Ala. 670 , 42 So.2d 619 .

Stewart v. Lewis

16 Ala. 734 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jun 15, 1849

And the same doctrine was re-asserted in Dawes v. Howard, et al. 4 Mass. … In Reeves v. Brymer, 6 Vesey, 425, a father was allowed for expenditures made in support of his infant daughter, before the master’s report.

Thomas v. Thomas

246 Ala. 484 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Mar 1, 1945

Brown, 198 Ala. 638 , 73 So. 964 ; Robertson v. State, 29 Ala.App. 399 , 197 So. 73 , certiorari denied 240 Ala. 51 , 197 So. 75 ; 5 C.J.S., Appeal and Error, p. 264, § 1533), we will so assume. … Birmingham Loan & Auction Co. v. First Nat. Bank of Anniston, supra (4). Affirmed. GARDNER, C. J., and BROWN and LIVINGSTON, JJ., concur. 1 31 Ala.App. 287 .

Ex Parte McGahee

632 So. 2d 981 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Dec 17, 1993

McGahee v. State , supra. This Court affirmed the judgment of the Court of Criminal Appeals. McGahee v. State , 554 So.2d 473 (Ala. 1989). … After shooting and beating Brown and Lee, McGahee turned to Duncan and beat her.

Royal Ins. v. All States Theatres, Inc.

242 Ala. 417 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Feb 19, 1942

Co. v. Talley-Bates Const. Co., 162 Ala. 396 , 50 So. 341 ; Ware v. Hamilton Brown Shoe Co., 92 Ala. 145 , 9 So. 136 .” In the sustaining of demurrer to plea 23, there was error to reverse. … J., BROWN, and FOSTER, JJ., concur.

Adams v. Coe

123 Ala. 664 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Nov 15, 1898

. — Code, §. 5208; Brown v. State, 63 Ala. 97 ; Rhodes v. King, 52 Ala. 272 ; Crosby v. Hawthorn, 25 Ala. 221 ; Williams v. State, 88 Ala. 80 ; Ewing v. Sanford, 19 Ala. 605 ; Field v. Ireland, 21 Ala. 240 ; Brown v. … —Rhodes v. King, 52 Ala. 272, 274-5 ; Spear v. State, 120 Ala. 351 .

Locke v. Wheat

350 So. 2d 451 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Sep 30, 1977

League of Women Voters v. Renfro, 292 Ala. 128 , 290 So.2d 167 (1974); City of Montgomery v. Montgomery City Lines, 254 Ala. 652 , 49 So.2d 199 (1950); Street v. Cloe, 207 Ala. 631 , 93 So. 591 (1922). … Kusper v. Pontikes, supra; Southwest Airlines Co. v. Texas International Airlines, 546 F.2d 84 (5th Cir. 1977).

Cooper v. Watson

73 Ala. 252 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Dec 15, 1882

State, 38 Ala. 600 ; Dillingham v. Brown, Ib. 311; Wright v. Mattison, 18 How. (U. S.) 50; Pillow v. Roberts, 13 How. (U. S.) 472. … Cases, supra; Mather v. Trinity Church, 3 Serg. & Rawle, 509 ; Baker v. Howell, 6 Ib. 476; Brown v. Caldwell, 10 Ib. 114; Powell v. Smith, 2 Watts, 126 ; Brothers v. Hurdle, 10 *255 Ired. (Law) 490; Branch v.

Wright v. Turner

351 So. 2d 1 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Nov 4, 1977

all schools, colleges and universities of the State; members of city and county industrial boards, planning and zoning boards, school boards, boards of adjustment, utility boards, housing boards, public hospital boards, and … In State v.

State ex rel. Tyson v. Houghton

142 Ala. 90 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Nov 15, 1904

Bank of Mobile, 33 Ala. 693 ; George v. Skeaters, 19 Ala. 738 ; Brick. Dig. p. 463, §§ 44, 45; Sedgwick’s Stat. and Const. … In Parker v. Hubbard, 64 Ala. 207 , it was said, there quoting from Sedgwick on Stat. & Con.

Ex Parte Watkins

109 So. 2d 671 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Feb 19, 1959

Ferlita v. Figarrota, supra; Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York v. Plumbing Department Store, 117 Fla. 119 , 157 So. 506 ; People ex rel. Macauley v. … See Byars v. Town of Boaz, supra. We have carefully reviewed the record and we cannot say that the action of the Personnel Board—affirmed by the circuit court—was not supported by substantial legal evidence.

Ex Parte Tennessee Coal, Iron R. Co.

206 Ala. 403 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jun 30, 1921

Shanan v. Brown, 179 Ala. 432 , 433 , 60 So. 891 , 43 L.R.A. (N.S.) 792, supra; 27 R. C. L. pp. 1149, 1150, § 78; Vanderwiele v. Taylor, 65 N.Y. 341 , 346 ; Reilly v. Stephenson, 222 Pa. 252 , 70 A. 1097 , 22 L.R.A. … Shanan v. Brown, supra; 27 R. C. L. p. 1150; Reilly v. Stephenson, supra.

Spear v. State

120 Ala. 351 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Nov 15, 1898

—Murphy v. State, 55 Ala. 252 . In the case of Brown v. … In Brown v. The State, 109 Ala. 86 , it is said the warrant "must also state the offense either by name or so that it can be clearly inferred.” In Williams v.

Tuscaloosa Veneer Co. v. Martin

233 Ala. 567 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jan 7, 1937

Brown & Sons Lumber Co. v. … Martin v. Republic Steel Co., supra; Birmingham Post Co. v. Sturgeon, 227 Ala. 162 , 149 So. 74 ; W. P. Brown & Sons Lumber Co. v. Crossley, supra.

Dowdle v. Aurora Loan Services, Inc.

872 So. 2d 810 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Mar 28, 2003

State v. Cobb, 288 Ala. 675, 678 , 264 So.2d 523, 526 (1972) (quoting State v. Williams, 69 Ala. 311, 316 (1881)). … See Walker v.

Hasting v. Roberts

230 So. 3d 391 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Feb 17, 2017

Discussion In South Alabama Gas District v. … (citing National Collegiate Athletic Ass’n v. Jones, 1 S.W.3d 83, 86 (Tex. 1999)).’ “Chapman v. Gooden, 974 So.2d 972, 983 (Ala. 2007) (first emphasis, added). See also Steffel v.

Ex parte Teachers' Retirement System of Alabama PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS (In re: Teachers' Retirement System of Alabama and Employees' Retirement System of Alabama v. Baldwin County Planning and Zoning Department; Baldwin County Board of Adjustment No. 1; and Point Clear Property Owners Association, Inc.) (Baldwin Circuit Court: CV-21-900858; Civil Appeals CL-2022-0697).

Supreme Court of Alabama · May 2, 2025

See Hanes v. … ("PCPOA"), to appeal to the Baldwin County Board of Adjustment ("the Board") as a "person aggrieved" was not an issue that implicated the Board's subject-matter jurisdiction. See Lexmark Int'l, Inc. v.

Ex Parte Johnson

507 So. 2d 1351 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Oct 3, 1986

Dorsey v. State , 406 So.2d 457 (Ala.Cr.App. 1981). We have also held, however, in Brown v. … Initially, in its opinion, the Court of Criminal Appeals correctly acknowledged that the defendant's conviction would be reversed on the authority of Brown v.