Case law

Bell v. King

210 Ala. 551 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jan 17, 1924

In Brown v. Bell, 206 Ala. 182 , 89 South. 659 , this cause was here on appeal from a decree overruling the motion to dissolve the temporary injunction.' … Anniston Banking & Loan Co. v. Lapsley, 200 Ala. 377 , 76 South. 293 ; Seed v. Brown, 180 Ala. 8 , 60 South. 98 ; Pollard v. American Mtg. Co., 103 Ala. 289 , 16 South. 801 .

Phillips v. Adams

70 Ala. 373 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Dec 15, 1881

—Martin v. Wharton, 38 Ala. 637 ; Browne Stat. Fr. § 505 ; Price v. Weaver, 13 Gray, 273 . … —Browne Stat. Frauds, §§ 390-1; Sears v. Brink, 3 Amer. Dec. 475.

Chastang v. Moog

230 Ala. 452 · Supreme Court of Alabama · May 9, 1935

Board of School Com’rs of Mobile County v. American Surety Co. of New York, 220 Ala. 458 , 125 So. 906 ; City of Montgomery v. American Ry. Express Co., 219 Ala. 476 , 122 So. 639 . … Cobb et al. v. Vary, 120 Ala. 263 , 24 So. 442 ; Sheffield City Co. et al. v. Tradesman’s National Bank, 131 Ala. 185 , 32 So. 598 ; Union Central Life Ins. Co. v. State ex rel.

Walker v. Walker

264 Ala. 11 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Dec 22, 1955

Davidson v. Brown, 215 Ala. 205 , 110 So. 384 ; Chapman v. Turner, 255 Ala. 423 , 51 So.2d 867 . … City of Mobile v. Board of Revenue and Road Commissioners of Mobile County, 219 Ala. 60 , 121 So. 49 .

Cartwright v. Braly

218 Ala. 49 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jun 21, 1928

King v. Livingston Mfg, Co., 180 Ala. 118 , 60 So. 143 ; Shalian v. Brown, 167 Ala. 534 , 52 So. 737 ; Tillis v. … All the Justices concur, except BROWN, J., not sitting.

Sizemore v. Grimes

251 Ala. 702 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Dec 14, 1948

Exchange Distributing Co. v. Oslin

229 Ala. 547 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jan 17, 1935

In the case of Taylor v. … J., and THOMAS and BROWN, JJ., concur. ®=»For other cases see same topic and KEY NUMBER in all Key Number Digests and Indexes --

Butler v. ALABAMA JUDICIAL INQUIRY COM'N

802 So. 2d 207 · Supreme Court of Alabama · May 15, 2001

United States v. Associated Press, 52 F.Supp. 362, 372 (S.D.N.Y.1943)." Id. at 270-71 , 84 S.Ct. 710 . Discussing the First Amendment in the context of elections, the Supreme Court stated in Brown v. … The Alabama State Bar Disciplinary Board held that the appropriate discipline was public censure. This Court affirmed the conviction and the sentence.

Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Chamblee

122 Ala. 428 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Nov 15, 1898

Co. v. Daughtery, 89 Ala. 191 . … Pearsall v. W. U. Tel. Co., 124 N. Y. 256 ; s. c. 21 Am. St. Rep. 662 ; W. U. Tel. Co. v.

Vary v. Sensabaugh

156 Ala. 459 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jun 30, 1908

There was proof that Brown went into possession, but it was surrendered back to Smith before the purchase of either of the parties to this suit, and, as Brown did not reconvey to Smith, the defendants do not hold under Brown … The rule against recovery on a title acquired while the property was held adversely does not apply when the property was purchased at a judicial sale. — Sibley v. Alba, 95 Ala. 199 , 10 South. 831 ; Humes v.

Hines v. Miniard

204 Ala. 514 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jun 3, 1920

Co. v. Lee, 92 Ala. 262 ; 9 South. 230 . … Co. v. Brewer, 147 Ky. 166 , 143 S. W. 1014 , 39 L. R. A. (N. S.) 647, Ann. Cas. 1913D, 151; Meyer v. St. L., I. M. & S. Ry. Co., 54 Fed. 116 , 4 C. C.

Johnson v. Barnes

250 Ala. 292 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Feb 26, 1948

The successive statutory changes concerning the subject were reviewed in the recent case of City of Birmingham v. Brown, 241 Ala. 203 , 2 So. 2d 305 . … Greenwood et al. v. *293 State ex rel. Bailes, Solicitor, 229 Ala. 630 , 159 So. 9 . We must therefore dismiss the appeal. Appeal dismissed. GARDNER, C. J., and BROWN and SIMPSON, JJ., concur.

Ex Parte Cranman

792 So. 2d 392 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Nov 22, 2000

Wirtes, Jr., of Cunningham, Bounds, Yance, Crowder & Brown, L.L.C.; and S. … and city boards of education").

City Council v. Burnett

149 Ala. 119 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Feb 12, 1907

.” — Inge v. Board of Public Works, 135 Ala. 187, 200 , 33 South. 678 , 682, 93 Am. St. Rep. 20 . … A. 527). — Alameda Macadamising Co. v. Pringle, 130 Cal. 226 , 62 Pac. 394 , 52 L. R. A. 264, 80 Am. St. Rep. 124 , in which case Brown v.

Hall v. Underwood

258 Ala. 392 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Feb 26, 1953

Barnett, 247 Ala. 418 , 24 So.2d 665 , 667: “And in Board of Revenue v. … The Oden Act does not purport to make provisions “for the ‘conduct of elections’ Dunn v. Dean, 196 Ála. 486> 71 So. 709, 714 ; •State ex rel. Brown v.

Ladd v. Stockham

209 So. 3d 457 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Mar 25, 2016

Brown, 496 So.2d 756, 758 (Ala.1986). … See Walding v.

Freeman v. Holyfield

179 So. 3d 101 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Apr 17, 2015

Jones v. BP Oil Co., 632 So.2d 435, 439 (Ala.1993) (citing Allied Supply Co. v. Brown, 585 So.2d 33, 36 (Ala.1991), and Webb v. Renfrow, 453 So.2d 724, 727 (Ala.1984)). … Co. v. Joy Mfg. Co., 619 So.2d 1280, 1290 (Ala.1993). See also O’Dell v. State ex rel.

Burgin v. Sugg

204 Ala. 270 · Supreme Court of Alabama · May 20, 1920

Dexter v. Ohlander, 95 Ala. 467 , 10 South. 527 . … , and for that reason, no doubt, Brown has by amendment beén made a party defendant.

Mason v. Connecticut Gen. Life Ins. Co.

367 So. 2d 1374 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jan 26, 1979

Board of Water Sewer Commissioners of City of Mobile v. Alabama Power Company , 363 So.2d 304 (Ala. 1978); Fleming v. Alabama Farm Bureau Mutual Casualty Insurance Company , 293 Ala. 719 , 310 So.2d 200 (1975); Ray v. … Wilkey v. Aetna Life Insurance Co. , 269 Ala. 308 , 112 So.2d 458 (1959); Pan Coastal Life Insurance Co. v. Malone , 40 Ala.

Oden v. Bonner

93 Ala. 393 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Nov 15, 1890

On the trial, and after the testimony was concluded, plaintiff, by leave of the court, amended the complaint by striking out the name of Brown and the words, “late partners under the firm-name of Oden & Brown,” and also by … settled, that a partnership creditor may sue one of the members of the firm, for a debt contracted in, the partnership name, whether by account or otherwise, and declare upon the demand as his individual liability — Clark v.