Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
2.04s
1 So. 3d 15 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Apr 11, 2008
Brown , 496 So.2d 756 , 758 (Ala. 1986). … Advertiser Co. v. Hobbie, supra; Morgan County Board of Education v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedBradford v. Birmingham Electric Co.
227 Ala. 285 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jun 8, 1933
Smith v. Baggett, 218 Ala. 227 , 118 So. 283 ; Grauer v. A. G. S. R. R. Co., 209 Ala. 568 , 96 So. 915 . … X, and THOMAS and BROWN, JJ., concur.
Cited 19 timesPublishedChristensen v. Southern Normal School
790 So. 2d 252 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jan 12, 2001
Blane v. Alabama Commerical Coll. , supra. … See Houston v. Mile High Adventist Acad. , 872 F. Supp. at 833 ; and Cencor, Inc. v. Tolman , 868 P.2d at 399 .
Cited 6 timesPublishedWatson, Watson, Rutland/Architects, Inc. v. BD. OF EDUC.
559 So. 2d 168 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Feb 23, 1990
No. 621 v. … In Board of Educ. of Hudson City School Dist. v.
Cited 15 timesPublished240 Ala. 327 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Nov 28, 1940
Board of Revenue of Covington County v. Merrill, 193 Ala. 521, 544 , 68 So. 971 ; Ex parte Stickney, 40 Ala. 160 . … The subject in this and other jurisdictions was discussed in the case of Board of Revenue of Covington County v.
Cited 7 timesPublished737 So. 2d 443 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Mar 26, 1999
See Watkins v. Board of Trustees of Alabama State University, 703 So.2d 335 (Ala. 1997). The trial court granted a petition for the writ of quo warranto filed by Donald V. Watkins and Robert A. … In Cook v.
Cited 2 timesPublished684 So. 2d 681 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Sep 29, 1995
Howell, 410 U.S. 315 , 93 S.Ct. 979 , 35 L.Ed.2d 320 modified, 411 U.S. 922 , 93 S.Ct. 1475 , 36 L.Ed.2d 316 (1973), and Brown v. … Second, we note that in Shaw v.
Cited 2 timesPublished251 Ala. 349 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Nov 18, 1948
It is not always appropriate to make construction of an instrument on a *352 demurrer to the bill seeking a declaratory-judgment (Alabama State Milk Control Board v. … BROWN, ' LAWSON, SIMPSON, and STÁKELY, JJ., concur.
Cited 27 timesPublished253 Ala. 597 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Mar 2, 1950
Oxford v. Estes, supra. . … BROWN, LIVINGSTON, LAWSON, SIMPSON and STAKELY, JJ., concur.
Cited 9 timesPublished233 Ala. 310 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jan 7, 1937
Lay v. Fuller et al., 178 Ala. 375 , 59 So. 609 ; Moore v. Terry, 220 Ala. 47 , 124 So. 80 ; Duncan et al v. Watson, 198 Ala. 180 , 73 So. 448 ; Henry et al. v. … J., and BROWN and KNIGHT, JJ., concur. 1 Ante, p. 109.
Cited 9 timesPublishedLouisville N. R. Co. v. Maddox
236 Ala. 594 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jan 20, 1938
Montgomery would not have been in appellant’s waiting room at Montgomery to again board a train to Mobile if she had not been placed upon or permitted to board this section of defendant’s train in question at Birmingham by … J., and BROWN and KNIGHT, JJ., concur.
Cited 53 timesPublished30 Ala. 341 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jan 15, 1857
.” — Drake v. Goree, 22 Ala. 414 ; Casey v. Holmes, 10 Ala. 786 ; Phil, on Ev., Cow. & Hill’s notes, vol. 3, p. 1399, note 957; Doe v. Holton, 4 Ad. & Ellis, 81; Talliaferro v. Brown, 11 Ala. 707 . … . — Martin v. Knowllys, 8 T. R. 145; 1 Chit. Pl. 45.
Cited 19 timesPublishedAlmon v. Commission of Education
265 Ala. 489 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jan 17, 1957
City of Mobile v. Board of Revenue and Road Commissioners of Mobile County, supra; Schillinger v. Wickersham, 199 Ala. 612 , 75 So. 11 . … Champion v. Central of Georgia R. Co., 165 Ala. 551 , 51 So. 562, 563 ; Brown v. Ashworth, 237 Ala. 160 , 185 So. 754 . The record shows that immediately after the statement of the court, “Mr.
Cited 4 timesPublishedHenson v. HealthSouth Medical Center, Inc.
891 So. 2d 863 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Apr 30, 2004
The trial court granted the motions and dismissed Henson's action against HealthSouth, the Board, and the City. The trial court, citing as authority Doremus v. … HOUSTON, BROWN, JOHNSTONE, and WOODALL, JJ., concur. 1 Although HealthSouth, the Board, and the City of Birmingham are listed on the notice of appeal as appellees in this appeal, only HealthSouth has submitted a brief to
Cited 5 timesPublishedRivard v. UNIV. OF ALA. HEALTH SERVICES
835 So. 2d 987 · Supreme Court of Alabama · May 17, 2002
See Marsh v. Green , 782 So.2d 223 (Ala. 2000); Atkins v. Lee , 603 So.2d 937 (Ala. 1992). Finally, Dr. Rivard presented the expert testimony of Dr. Max Burr, a board-certified orthopedic surgeon. Dr. … Houston, See, Lyons, Brown, Johnstone, Harwood, Woodall, and Stuart, JJ., concur. *Page 990
Cited 16 timesPublishedState Ex Rel. Edmunds v. Moses
231 Ala. 215 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Nov 14, 1935
City of Mobile v. Smith, 223 Ala. 480 , 136 So. 851 ; Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland v. Farmers’ Hardware Co., 223 Ala. 477 , 136 So. 824 . … THOMAS, BOULDIN, and BROWN, JJ., concur.
Cited 4 timesPublished234 Ala. 446 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jun 14, 1937
application for rehearing our attention has been called for the first time to an act of the Legislature of Alabama, approved September 13, 1935, Gen.Acts 1935, p. 1064, entitled: “An Act “To provide authority for the State Board … J., and THOMAS and BROWN, JJ-, concur.
Cited 7 timesPublished823 So. 2d 640 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Dec 14, 2001
Co. v. Rice , 585 So.2d 859 (Ala. 1991). … Houston, Brown, Woodall, and Stuart, JJ., concur. Lyons and Harwood, JJ., concur in the result.
Cited 43 timesPublished224 Ala. 261 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Dec 3, 1931
Harry, 215 Ala. 458 , 111 So. 41 ; Kearley v. State ex rel. Hamilton, 223 Ala. 548 , 137 So. 424 . In support of the act, the appellee relies largely upon the cases of Board of Revenue v. … THOMAS, BOULDIN, BROWN, and KNIGHT, JJ., concur.
Cited 27 timesPublishedDallas County Bd. of Educ. v. Henry
507 So. 2d 911 · Supreme Court of Alabama · May 1, 1987
The Board sought to intervene as a party defendant as a matter of right pursuant to Rule 24(a), A.R.Civ.P. The trial court's denial of the Board's motion to intervene is an appealable order. Crossfield v. … In order to determine whether the trial court erred in denying the Board's motion to intervene, we must consider the interest of the Board in the pending action. United States Fidelity Guaranty Co. v. Adams , supra.
Cited 8 timesPublished
Ask Donna