Opinion

United States v. Brown

Court
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Filed
Sep 30, 1999
Status
Unpublished
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-6728

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

JAMES ALBERT BROWN,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Columbia. Dennis W. Shedd, District Judge.

(CR-95-443)

Submitted: September 21, 1999 Decided: September 30, 1999

Before MURNAGHAN, HAMILTON, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James Albert Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Henry Douglas Knight, Jr.,

Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

James Albert Brown appeals the district court’s order granting

the Government’s motion for payment of restrained funds to defray

legal expenses associated with his criminal trial. We have re-

viewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

district court. See United States v. Brown, No. CR-95-443 (D.S.C.

May 7, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.