Opinion

James v. Baldwin County Board of Education

Court
District Court, S.D. Alabama
Filed
Jun 17, 2022
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 16.6%

“Under the Federal Rules, an amended complaint supersedes the original complaint.”

How later courts described this case

  • “Under the Federal Rules, an amended complaint supersedes the original complaint.”

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

MICHAEL R. JAMES, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

vs. ) CIVIL ACTION No. 22-0031-CG-N

)

BALDWIN COUNTY BOARD OF )

EDUCATION, )

)

Defendant. )

ORDER

After due and proper consideration of the issues raised, and a de novo

determination of those portions of the recommendation to which objection is made,

the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. 16) made under 28

U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B)–(C), Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b), and S.D. Ala.

GenLR 72(a)(2)(S), and dated May 18, 2022, is ADOPTED as the opinion of this

Court.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Defendant Baldwin County Board of

Education’s motion to dismiss (Doc. 5) is GRANTED. Plaintiff Michael R. James

shall file an amended complaint, if any, addressing the defects set out in the Report

and Recommendation no later than July 1, 2022. The amended complaint, which

will become the operative complaint in this action,1 “must reproduce the entire

1 “As a general matter, ‘[a]n amended pleading supersedes the former pleading;

the original pleading is abandoned by the amendment, and is no longer a part of the

pleader's averments against his adversary.’ ” Pintando v. Miami-Dade Hous. Agency,

501 F.3d 1241, 1243 (11th Cir. 2007) (per curiam) (quoting Dresdner Bank AG,

pleading as amended and may not incorporate any prior pleading by reference.” See

S.D. Ala. CivLR 15(a).

DONE and ORDERED this 17th day of June, 2022.

/s/ Callie V. S. Granade

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Dresdner Bank AG in Hamburg v. M/V OLYMPIA VOYAGER, 463 F.3d 1210, 1215

(11th Cir. 2006) (citation and quotation omitted)); see also, e.g., Fritz v. Standard Sec.

Life Ins. Co. of New York, 676 F.2d 1356, 1358 (11th Cir. 1982) (“Under the Federal

Rules, an amended complaint supersedes the original complaint.”).

2

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.