Opinion

Jeanne Rodriguez v. County of San Bernardino

Court
District Court, C.D. California
Filed
Mar 8, 2023
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 16.4%

peace officers have constitutionally-based “privacy rights 5 [that] are not inconsequential” in their police personnel records

How later courts described this case

  • peace officers have constitutionally-based “privacy rights 5 [that] are not inconsequential” in their police personnel records

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

Case 5:21-cv-01471-MEMF-SHK Document 48 Filed 03/08/23 Page 1 of 18 Page ID #:367

1 Shannon L. Gustafson (SBN 228856)

sgustafson@lynberg.com

2 Anita K. Clarke (SBN 321015)

aclarke@lynberg.com

3 LYNBERG & WATKINS

A Professional Corporation

4 1100 W. Town & Country Road, Suite #1450

Orange, California 92868

5 (714) 937-1010 Telephone

(714) 937-1003 Facsimile

6

Attorneys for Defendant, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO

7

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

11 JEANNE RODRIGUEZ, KAYLA CASE NO. 5:21-cv-01471-MEMF-SHK

12 FERRER and THE ESTATE OF Assigned for All Purposes to:

JIMMY RAY FERRER, by and through Hon. Maame Ewusi-Mensah Frimpong

13 it successor in interest. JEANNE Courtroom 8B, Magistrate Shashi H.

Kewalramani

14 RODRIGUEZ

[DISCOVERY MATTER]

15 Plaintiff,

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE

16 vs. ORDER

17 COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, a

public entity, UNNAMED COUNTY Trial Date: TBD

18

DEPUTY SHERIFFS, individuals, and Complaint filed: April 19, 2022

19 DOES 1 through 50, Inclusive

20 Defendant.

21

22 TO THE HONORABLE COURT:

23 By and through their counsel of record in this action, Plaintiffs JEANNE

24 RODRIGUEZ, KAYLA FERRER and THE ESTATE OF JIMMY FERRER, by and

25 through it successor in interest, JEANNE RODRIGUEZ (“Plaintiffs”), and Defendant

26 COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO (“Defendant”), collectively “the parties” hereby

27 stipulate for the purpose of jointly requesting that the Honorable Court enter a

28

1

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER

Case 5:21-cv-01471-MEMF-SHK Document 48 Filed 03/08/23 Page 2 of 18 Page ID #:368

1 protective order re confidential documents in this matter (and pursuant to Fed. R. Civ.

2 P. Rules 5, 2, 7, and 26, as well as U.S. Dist. Ct. C.D. Cal. Local Rules 7-1 and 52-

3 4.1; and any applicable Orders of the Court) as follows:

4 1. A. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS

5 Discovery in this action is likely to involve production of confidential,

6 proprietary, or private information for which special protection from public disclosure

7 and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation may be warranted.

8 Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate to and petition the Court to enter the

9 following Protective Order. The parties acknowledge that this Order does not confer

10 blanket protections on all disclosures or responses to discovery and that the protection

11 it affords from the public disclosure and use extends only to the limited information

12 or items that are entitled to confidential treatment under the applicable legal

13 principles. The parties further acknowledge, as set forth in Section 12.3, below, that

14 this Stipulated Protective Order does not entitle them to file confidential information

15 under seal; Civil Local Rule 79-5 sets forth the procedures that must be followed and

16 the standards that will be applied when a party seeks permission from the court to file

17 material under seal.

18 B. GOOD CAUSE STATEMENT

19 This action is likely to involve interests of confidentiality and privacy in peace

20 officer personnel file records and associated investigative or confidential records for

21 the following reasons.

22 First, Defendant contends that peace officers have a federal privilege of privacy

23 in their personnel file records: a reasonable expectation of privacy therein that is

24 underscored, specified, and arguably heightened by the Pitchess protective procedure

25 of California law. See Sanchez v. Santa Ana Police Dept., 936 F.2d 1027, 1033-1034

26 (9th Cir. 1990); Hallon v. City of Stockton, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14665, *2-3, 12-

27 13 (E.D. Cal. 2012) (concluding that “while “[f]ederal law applies to privilege based

28

2

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER

Case 5:21-cv-01471-MEMF-SHK Document 48 Filed 03/08/23 Page 3 of 18 Page ID #:369

1 discovery disputes involving federal claims,” the “state privilege law which is

2 consistent with its federal equivalent significantly assists in applying [federal]

3 privilege law to discovery disputes”); Soto v. City of Concord, 162 F.R.D. 603, 613

4 n. 4, 616 (N.D. Cal. 1995) (peace officers have constitutionally-based “privacy rights

5 [that] are not inconsequential” in their police personnel records); cf. Cal. Penal Code

6 §§ 832.7, 832.8; Cal. Evid. Code §§ 1040-1047. Defendant further contends that

7 uncontrolled disclosure of such personnel file information can threaten the safety of

8 non-party witnesses, officers, and their families/associates.

9 Second, Defendant contend that municipalities and law enforcement agencies

10 have federal deliberative-executive process privilege, federal official information

11 privilege, federal law enforcement privilege, and federal attorney-client privilege

12 and/or attorney work product protection interests in the personnel files of their peace

13 officers – particularly as to those portions of peace officer personnel files that contain

14 critical self-analysis, internal deliberation/decision-making or evaluation/analysis, or

15 communications for the purposes of obtaining or rendering legal advice or analysis –

16 potentially including but not limited to evaluative/ analytical portions of Internal

17 Affairs type records or reports, evaluative/analytical portions of supervisory records

18 or reports, and/or reports prepared at the direction of counsel, or for the purpose of

19 obtaining or rendering legal advice. See Sanchez, 936 F.2d at 1033-1034; Maricopa

20 Audubon Soc’y v. United States Forest Serv., 108 F.3d 1089, 1092-1095 (9th Cir.

21 1997); Soto v. City of Concord, 162 F.R.D. 603, 613 n. 4 (1995); Kelly v. City of San

22 Jose, 114 F.R.D. 654, 668-671 (N.D. Cal. 1987); Tuite v. Henry, 181 F.R.D. 175, 176-

23 177 (D. D.C. 1998); Hamstreet v. Duncan, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 89702 (D. Or.

24 2007); Admiral Ins. Co. v. United States Dist. Ct., 881 F.2d 1486, 1492, 1495 (9th

25 Cir. 1988). Defendant further contends that such personnel file records are restricted

26 from disclosure by the public entity’s custodian of records pursuant to applicable

27 California law and that uncontrolled release is likely to result in needless intrusion of

28

3

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER

Case 5:21-cv-01471-MEMF-SHK Document 48 Filed 03/08/23 Page 4 of 18 Page ID #:370

1 officer privacy; impairment in the collection of third-party witness information and

2 statements and related legitimate law enforcement investigations/ interests; and a

3 chilling of open and honest discussion regarding and/or investigation into alleged

4 misconduct that can erode a public entity’s ability to identify and/or implement any

5 remedial measures that may be required.

6 Third, Defendant contends that, since peace officers do not have the same rights

7 as other private citizens to avoid giving compelled statements, it is contrary to the

8 fundamental principles of fairness to permit uncontrolled release of officers’

9 compelled statements. See generally Lybarger v. City of Los Angeles, 40 Cal.3d 822,

10 828-830 (1985); cf. U.S. Const., Amend V.

11 Accordingly, Defendant contends that, without a protective order preventing

12 such, production of confidential records in the case can and will likely substantially

13 impair defendant public entity’s interests in candid self-critical analysis, frank internal

14 deliberations, obtaining candid information from witnesses, preserving the safety of

15 witnesses, preserving the safety of peace officers and peace officers’ families and

16 associates, protecting the privacy officers of peace officers, and preventing pending

17 investigations from being detrimentally undermined by publication of private,

18 sensitive, or confidential information – as can and often does result in litigation.

19 1.2. Plaintiffs do not agree with and does not stipulate to Defendant’s

20 contentions herein above, and nothing in this Stipulation or its associated Order shall

21 resolve the parties’ disagreement, or bind them, concerning the legal statements and

22 claimed privileges set forth above. However, Plaintiffs agree that there is Good Cause

23 for a Protective Order consistent with the terms and provisions of this Stipulation so

24 as to preserve the respective interests of the parties without the need to further burden

25 the Court with such issues.

26 1.3. The parties jointly contend that there is typically a particularized need

27 for protection as to any medical or psychotherapeutic records and autopsy

28

4

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER

Case 5:21-cv-01471-MEMF-SHK Document 48 Filed 03/08/23 Page 5 of 18 Page ID #:371

1 photographs, because of the privacy interests at stake therein. Because of these

2 sensitive interests, a Court Order should address these documents rather than a private

3 agreement between the parties.

4 1.4. The parties therefore stipulate that there is Good Cause for, and hereby

5 jointly request that the Honorable Court issue/enter, a Protective Order regarding

6 confidential documents consistent with the terms and provisions of this Stipulation.

7 However, the entry of a Protective Order by the Court pursuant to this Stipulation

8 shall not be construed as any ruling by the Court on the aforementioned legal

9 statements or privilege claims in this section (§ 1), nor shall this section be construed

10 as part of any such Court Order.

11 Accordingly, to expedite the flow of information, to facilitate the prompt

12 resolution of disputes over confidentiality of discovery materials, to adequately

13 protect information the parties are entitled to keep confidential, to ensure that the

14 parties are permitted reasonable necessary uses of such material in preparation for and

15 in the conduct of trial, to address their handling at the end of the litigation, and serve

16 the ends of justice, a protective order for such information is justified in this matter.

17 It is the intent of the parties that information will not be designated as confidential for

18 tactical reasons and that nothing be so designated without a good faith belief that it

19 has been maintained in a confidential, non-public manner, and there is good cause

20 why it should not be part of the public record of this case.

21 2. DEFINITIONS

22 2.1 Action: Refers to this pending federal law suit Case No. 5:21-cv-02065-

23 JWH-SHK.

24 2.2 Challenging Party: a Party or Non-Party that challenges the designation

25 of information or items under this Order.

26 2.3 "CONFIDENTIAL" Information or Items: information (regardless of how

27

28

5

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER

Case 5:21-cv-01471-MEMF-SHK Document 48 Filed 03/08/23 Page 6 of 18 Page ID #:372

1 it is generated, stored or maintained) or tangible things that qualify for protection

2 under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c), and as specified above in the

3 Good Cause Statement.

4 2.4 Counsel: Outside Counsel of Record and House Counsel (as well as their

5 support staff).

6

2.5 Designating Party: a Party or Non-Party that designates information or

7

items that it produces in disclosures or in responses to discovery as

8

“CONFIDENTIAL”.

9

2.6 Disclosure or Discovery Material: all items or information, regardless

10

of the medium or manner in which it is generated, stored, or maintained (including,

11

among other things, testimony, transcripts, and tangible things), that are produced

12

or generated in disclosures or responses to discovery in this matter.

13

2.7 Expert: a person with specialized knowledge or experience in a matter

14

pertinent to the litigation who has been retained by a Party or its counsel to serve as

15

an expert witness or as a consultant in this Action.

16

2.8 House Counsel: attorneys who are employees of a party to this Action.

17

House Counsel does not include Outside Counsel of Record or any other outside

18

counsel.

19

2.9 Non-Party: any natural person, partnership, corporation, association, or

20

other legal entity not named as a Party to this action.

21

2.10 Outside Counsel of Record: attorneys who are not employees of a party

22

to this Action but are retained to represent or advise a party to this Action and have

23

appeared in this Action on behalf of that party or are affiliated with a law firm which

24

has appeared on behalf of that party, and includes support staff.

25

2.11 Party: any party to this Action, including all of its officers, directors,

26

employees, consultants, retained experts, and Outside Counsel of Record (and their

27

support staffs).

28

6

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER

Case 5:21-cv-01471-MEMF-SHK Document 48 Filed 03/08/23 Page 7 of 18 Page ID #:373

1 2.12 Producing Party: a Party or Non-Party that produces Disclosure or

2 Discovery Material in this Action.

3 2.13 Professional Vendors: persons or entities that provide litigation support

4 services (e.g., photocopying, videotaping, translating, preparing exhibits or

5 demonstratives, and organizing, storing, or retrieving data in any form or medium)

6 and their employees and subcontractors.

7 2.14 Protected Material: any Disclosure or Discovery Material that is

8 designated as "CONFIDENTIAL."

9 2.15 Receiving Party: a Party that receives Disclosure or Discovery Material

10 from a Producing Party.

11 3. SCOPE

12 The protections conferred by this Stipulation and Order cover not only

13 Protected Material (as defined above), but also (1) any information copied or

14 extracted from Protected Material; (2) all copies, excerpts, summaries, or

15 compilations of Protected Material; and (3) any testimony, conversations, or

16 presentations by Parties or their Counsel that might reveal Protected Material.

17 Any use of Protected Material at trial shall be governed by the orders of the

18 trial judge. This Order does not govern the use of Protected Material at trial.

19 4. DURATION

20 Even after final disposition of this litigation, the confidentiality obligations

21 imposed by this Order shall remain in effect until a Designating Party agrees

22 otherwise in writing or a court order otherwise directs. Final disposition shall be

23 deemed to be the later of (1) dismissal of all claims and defenses in this Action, with

24 or without prejudice; and (2) final judgment herein after the completion and

25 exhaustion of all appeals, rehearings, remands, trials, or reviews of this Action,

26 including the time limits for filing any motions or applications for extension of

27 time pursuant to applicable law.

28

7

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER

Case 5:21-cv-01471-MEMF-SHK Document 48 Filed 03/08/23 Page 8 of 18 Page ID #:374

1 5. DESIGNATING PROTECTED MATERIAL

2 5.1 Exercise of Restraint and Care in Designating Material for Protection.

3 Each Party or Non-Party that designates information or items for protection

4 under this Order must take care to limit any such designation to specific material

5 that qualifies under the appropriate standards. The Designating Party must designate

6 for protection only those parts of material, documents, items, or oral or written

7 communications that qualify so that other portions of the material, documents,

8 items, or communications for which protection is not warranted are not swept

9 unjustifiably within the ambit of this Order.

10 Mass, indiscriminate, or routinized designations are prohibited. Designations

11 that are shown to be clearly unjustified or that have been made for an improper

12 purpose (e.g., to unnecessarily encumber the case development process or to

13 impose unnecessary expenses and burdens on other parties) may expose the

14 Designating Party to sanctions.

15 If it comes to a Designating Party's attention that information or items

16 that it designated for protection do not qualify for protection, that Designating

17 Party must promptly notify all other Parties that it is withdrawing the inapplicable

18 designation.

19 5.2 Manner and Timing of Designations. Except as otherwise provided in this

20 Order (see, e.g., second paragraph of section 5.2(a) below), or as otherwise stipulated

21 or ordered, Disclosure or Discovery Material that qualifies for protection under this

22 Order must be clearly so designated before the material is disclosed or produced.

23 Designation in conformity with this Order requires:

24 (a) for information in documentary form (e.g., paper or electronic documents,

25 but excluding transcripts of depositions or other pretrial or trial proceedings), that the

26 Producing Party affix at a minimum, the legend "CONFIDENTIAL" (hereinafter

27 "CONFIDENTIAL legend"), to each page that contains protected material. If only a

28

8

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER

Case 5:21-cv-01471-MEMF-SHK Document 48 Filed 03/08/23 Page 9 of 18 Page ID #:375

1 portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing

2 Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate

3 markings in the margins).

4 A Party or Non-Party that makes original documents available for inspection

5 need not designate them for protection until after the inspecting Party has indicated

6 which documents it would like copied and produced. During the inspection and before

7 the designation, all of the material made available for inspection shall be deemed

8 "CONFIDENTIAL." After the inspecting Party has identified the documents, it wants

9 copied and produced, the Producing Party must determine which documents, or

10 portions thereof, qualify for protection under this Order. Then, before producing the

11 specified documents, the Producing Party must affix the "CONFIDENTIAL legend"

12 to each page that contains Protected Material. If only a portion or portions of the

13 material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly

14 identify the protected portions) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins).

15 (b) for testimony given in depositions that the Designating Party identify the

16 Disclosure or Discovery Material on the record, before the close of the deposition all

17 protected testimony.

18 (c) for information produced in some form other than documentary and for any

19 other tangible items, that the Producing Party affix in a prominent place on the exterior

20 of the container or containers in which the information is stored the legend

21 "CONFIDENTIAL." If only a portion or portions of the information warrants

22 protection, the Producing Party, to the extent practicable, shall identify the protected

23 portions).

24 5.3 Inadvertent Failures to Designate. If timely corrected, an inadvertent failure

25 to designate qualified information or items does not, standing alone, waive the

26 Designating Party's right to secure protection under this Order for such material.

27 Upon timely correction of a designation, the Receiving Party must make reasonable

28

9

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER

Case 5:21-cv-01471-MEMF-SHK Document 48 Filed 03/08/23 Page 10 of 18 Page ID #:376

1 efforts to assure that the material is treated in accordance with the provisions of this

2 Order.

3 6. CHALLENGING CONFIDENTIALITY DESIGNATIONS

4 6.1 Timing of Challenges. Any Party or Non-Party may challenge a designation

5 of confidentiality at any time that is consistent with the Court's Scheduling Order.

6 6.2 Meet and Confer. The Challenging party shall initiate the dispute resolution

7 process under Local Rule 37.1 et. seq.

8 6.3 The burden of persuasion in any such challenge proceeding shall be on the

9 Designating Party. Frivolous challenges, and those made for an improper purpose

10 (e.g., to harass or impose unnecessary expenses and burdens on other parties) may

11 expose the Challenging Party to sanctions. Unless the Designating Party has waived

12 or withdrawn the confidentiality designation, all parties shall continue to afford the

13 material in question the level of protection to which it is entitled under the Producing

14 Party's designation until the Court rules on the challenge.

15 7. ACCESS TO AND USE OF PROTECTED MATERIAL

16 7.1 Basic Principles. A Receiving Party may use Protected Material that is

17 disclosed or produced by another Party or by a Non-Party in connection with this

18 Action only for prosecuting, defending, or attempting to settle this Action. Such

19 Protected Material may be disclosed only to the categories of persons and under the

20 conditions described in this Order. When the Action has been terminated, a

21 Receiving Party must comply with the provisions of section 13 below (FINAL

22 DISPOSITION).

23 Protected Material must be stored and maintained by a Receiving Party at a

24 location and in a secure manner that ensures that access is limited to the persons

25 authorized under this Order.

26 7.2 Disclosure of "CONFIDENTIAL" Information or Items. Unless

27

28

10

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER

Case 5:21-cv-01471-MEMF-SHK Document 48 Filed 03/08/23 Page 11 of 18 Page ID #:377

1 otherwise ordered by the court or permitted in writing by the Designating Party, a

2 Receiving Party may disclose any information or item designated

3 "CONFIDENTIAL" only to:

4 (a) the Receiving Party's Outside Counsel of Record in this Action, as

5 well as employees of said Outside Counsel of Record to whom it is reasonably

6 necessary to disclose the information for this Action;

7 (b) the officers, directors, and employees (including House Counsel)

8 of the Receiving Party to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary for this Action;

9 (c) Experts (as defined in this Order) of the Receiving Party to whom

10 disclosure is reasonably necessary for this Action and who have signed the

11 "Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound" (Exhibit A);

12 (d) the court and its personnel;

13 (e) court reporters and their staff;

14 (f) professional jury or trial consultants, mock jurors, and Professional

15 Vendors to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary for this Action and who

16 have signed the "Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound" (Exhibit A);

17 (g) the author or recipient of a document containing the information or a

18 custodian or other person who otherwise possessed or knew the information;

19 (h) during their depositions, witnesses, and attorneys for witnesses, in the

20 Action to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary provided: (1) the deposing party

21 requests that the witness sign the form attached as Exhibit 1 hereto; and (2) they

22 will not be permitted to keep any confidential information unless they sign

23 the "Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound" (Exhibit A), unless otherwise

24 agreed by the Designating Party or ordered by the court. Pages of transcribed

25 deposition testimony or exhibits to depositions that reveal Protected Material may

26 be separately bound by the court reporter and may not be disclosed to anyone except

27 as permitted under this Stipulated Protective Order; and

28

11

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER

Case 5:21-cv-01471-MEMF-SHK Document 48 Filed 03/08/23 Page 12 of 18 Page ID #:378

1 (i) any mediator or settlement officer, and their supporting personnel,

2 mutually agreed upon by any of the parties engaged in settlement discussions.

3 8. PROTECTED MATERIAL SUBPOENAED OR ORDERED

4 PRODUCED IN OTHER LITIGATION

5 If a Party is served with a subpoena or a court order issued in other litigation

6 that compels disclosure of any information or items designated in this Action as

7 "CONFIDENTIAL," that Party must:

8 (a) promptly notify in writing the Designating Party. Such notification shall

9 include a copy of the subpoena or court order;

10 (b) promptly notify in writing the party who caused the subpoena or order to

11 issue in the other litigation that some or all of the material covered by the subpoena

12 or order is subject to this Protective Order. Such notification shall include a copy

13 of this Stipulated Protective Order; and

14 (c) cooperate with respect to all reasonable procedures sought to be pursued

15 by the Designating Party whose Protected Material may be affected.

16 If the Designating Party timely seeks a protective order, the Party served

17 with the subpoena or court order shall not produce any information designated in

18 this action as "CONFIDENTIAL" before a determination by the court from which

19 the subpoena or order issued, unless the Party has obtained the Designating Party's

20 permission. The Designating Party shall bear the burden and expense of seeking

21 protection in that court of its confidential material and nothing in these provisions

22 should be construed as authorizing or encouraging a Receiving Party in this Action

23 to disobey a lawful directive from another court.

24 9. A NON-PARTY’S PROTECTED MATERIAL SOUGHT TO BE

25 PRODUCED IN THIS LITIGATION

26 (a) The terms of this Order are applicable to information produced by a Non-

27 Party in this Action and designated as "CONFIDENTIAL." Such information

28

12

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER

Case 5:21-cv-01471-MEMF-SHK Document 48 Filed 03/08/23 Page 13 of 18 Page ID #:379

1 produced by Non-Parties in connection with this litigation is protected by the

2 remedies and relief provided by this Order. Nothing in these provisions should be

3 construed as prohibiting a Non-Party from seeking additional protections.

4 (b) In the event that a Party is required, by a valid discovery request, to produce

5 a Non-Party's confidential information in its possession, and the Party is subject to an

6 agreement with the Non-Party not to produce the Non-Party's confidential

7 information, then the Party shall:

8 (1) promptly notify in writing the Requesting Party and the Non-Party

9 that some or all of the information requested is subject to a confidentiality agreement

10 With a Non- Party;

11 (2) promptly provide the Non-Party with a copy of the Stipulated

12 Protective Order in this Action, the relevant discovery request(s), and a

13 reasonably specific description of the information requested; and

14 (3) make the information requested available for inspection by the Non-

15 Party, if requested.

16 (c) If the Non-Party fails to seek a Protective Order from this court within 14

17 days of receiving the notice and accompanying information, the Receiving Party may

18 produce the Non-Party's confidential information responsive to the discovery request.

19 If the Non- Party timely seeks a protective order, the Receiving Party shall not

20 produce any information in its possession or control that is subject to the

21 confidentiality agreement with the Non-Party before a determination by the court.

22 Absent a court order to the contrary, the Non-Party shall bear the burden and expense

23 of seeking protection in this court of its Protected Material.

24 10. UNAUTHORIZED DISCLOSURE OF PROTECTED MATERIAL

25 If a Receiving Party learns that, by inadvertence or otherwise, it has

26 disclosed Protected Material to any person or in any circumstance not authorized

27 under this Stipulated Protective Order, the Receiving Party must immediately (a)

28

13

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER

Case 5:21-cv-01471-MEMF-SHK Document 48 Filed 03/08/23 Page 14 of 18 Page ID #:380

1 notify in writing the Designating Party of the unauthorized disclosures, (b) use its best

2 efforts to retrieve all unauthorized copies of the Protected Material, (c) inform the

3 person or persons to whom unauthorized disclosures were made of all the terms of

4 this Order, and (d) request such person or persons to execute the "Acknowledgment

5 and Agreement to be Bound" that is attached hereto as Exhibit A.

6 11. INADVERTENT PRODUCTION OF PRIVILEGED OR OTHERWISE

7 PROTECTED MATERIAL

8 When a Producing Party gives notice to Receiving Parties that certain

9 inadvertently produced material is subject to a claim of privilege or other protection,

10 the obligations of the Receiving Parties are those set forth in Federal Rule of Civil

11 Procedure 26(b)(5)(B). This provision is not intended to modify whatever procedure

12 may be established in an e-discovery order that provides for production without prior

13 privilege review. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 502(d) and (e), insofar as the

14 parties reach an agreement on the effect of disclosure of a communication or

15 information covered by the attorney-client privilege or work product protection, the

16 parties may incorporate their agreement in the stipulated protective order submitted

17 to the court.

18 12. MISCELLANEOUS

19 12.1 Right to Further Relief. Nothing in this Order abridges the right of any

20 person to seek its modification by the Court in the future.

21 12.2 Right to Assert Other Objections. By stipulating to the entry of this

22 Protective Order no Party waives any right it otherwise would have to object to

23 disclosing or producing any information or item on any ground not addressed in this

24 Stipulated Protective Order. Similarly, no Party waives any right to object on any

25 ground to use in evidence of any of the material covered by this Protective Order.

26 12.3 Filing Protected Material. A Party that seeks to file under seal any

27 Protected Material must comply with Civil Local Rule 79-5. Protected Material may

28

14

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER

Case 5:21-cv-01471-MEMF-SHK Document 48 Filed 03/08/23 Page 15 of 18 Page ID #:381

1 only be filed under seal pursuant to a court order authorizing the sealing of the specific

2 Protected Material at issue. If a Party's request to file Protected Material under seal is

3 denied by the court, then the Receiving Party may file the information in the public

4 record unless otherwise instructed by the court.

5 13. FINAL DISPOSITION

6 After the final disposition of this Action, as defined in paragraph 4, within 60

7 days of a written request by the Designating Party, each Receiving Party must return

8 all Protected Material to the Producing Party or destroy such material. As used in this

9 subdivision, "all Protected Material" includes all copies, abstracts, compilations,

10 summaries, and any other format reproducing or capturing any of the Protected

11 Material. Whether the Protected Material is returned or destroyed, the Receiving Party

12 must submit a written certification to the Producing Party (and, if not the same person

13 or entity, to the Designating Party) by the 60 day deadline that (1) identifies (by

14 category, where appropriate) all the Protected Material that was returned or destroyed

15 and (2) affirms that the Receiving Party has not retained any copies, abstracts,

16 compilations, summaries or any other format reproducing or capturing any of the

17 Protected Material. Notwithstanding this provision, Counsel are entitled to retain an

18 archival copy of all pleadings, motion papers, trial, deposition, and hearing

19 transcripts, legal memoranda, correspondence, deposition and trial exhibits, expert

20 reports, attorney work product, and consultant and expert work product, even if such

21 materials contain Protected Material. Any such archival copies that contain or

22 constitute Protected Material remain subject to this Protective Order as set forth in

23 Section 4 (DURATION).

24 14. Any violation of this Order may be punished by any and all appropriate

25 measures including, without limitation, contempt proceedings and/or monetary

26 sanctions.

27

28

15

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER

Case 5:21-cv-01471-MEMF-SHK Document 48 Filed 03/08/23 Page 16 of 18 Page ID #:382

1 IT IS SO STIPULATED THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD

2 DATED: March 3, 2023

3 LYNBERG & WATKINS

A Professional Corporation

4

5

/s/ Anita K. Clarke

6 SHANNON L. GUSTAFSON

ANITA K. CLARKE

7 Attorneys for Defendant, COUNTY

SAN BERNARDINO

8

9

10

DATED: March 3, 2023

11

12

ADAMSON AHDOOT, LLP

13

/s/ Federico C. Sayre

14

ALAN A. AHDOOT

CHRISTOPHER B. ADAMSON

15

FEDERICO C. SAYRE

Attorneys for Plaintiffs JEANNE

16

RODRIGUEZ, KAYLA FERRER and

THE ESTATE OF JIMMY RAY

17

FERRER

18

19

FOR GOOD CAUSE SHOWN, IT IS SO ORDERED.

20

21 DATED: March 8, 2023

22

23

24 Shashi H. Kewalramani

United States District/Magistrate Judge

25

26

27

28

16

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER

Case 5:21-cv-01471-MEMF-SHK Document 48 Filed 03/08/23 Page 17 of 18 Page ID #:383

1 EXHIBIT A

2 ACKNWLEDGEMENT AND AGREEMENT OT BE BOUND

3 I, [print or type full name], of [print

4 or type full address], declare under penalty of perjury that I have read in its entirety

5 and understand the Stipulated Protective Order that was issued by the United

6 States District Court for the Central District of California on [date] in the

7 case of Kayla Ferrer, et al. v. County of San Bernardino, et al., 5:21-cv-

8 01471-MEMF-SHK. I agree to comply with and to be bound by all the terms of

9 this Stipulated Protective Order and I understand and acknowledge that failure to so

10 comply could expose me to sanctions and punishment in the nature of contempt. I

11 solemnly promise that I will not disclose in any manner any information or item

12 that is subject to this Stipulated Protective Order to any person or entity except in

13 strict compliance with the provisions of this Order. I further agree to submit to the

14 jurisdiction of the United States District Court for the Central District of

15 California for the purpose of enforcing the terms of this Stipulated Protective

16 Order, even if such enforcement proceedings occur after termination of this

17 action. I hereby appoint [print or type full

18 name] of [print or type full address

19 and telephone number] as my California agent for service of process in connection

20 with this action or any proceedings related to enforcement of this Stipulated

21 Protective Order.

22 Date:

23 City and State where sworn and signed:

24

25 Printed name:

26

27 Signature:

28

17

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER

Case 5:21-cv-01471-MEMF-SHK Document 48 Filed 03/08/23 Page 18 of 18 Page ID #:384

1 I CERTIFY THAT ALL PARTIES TO THIS DOCUMENT HAVE CONSENTED

2 TO ITS FILING AND TO THE LANGUAGE CONTAINED HEREIN AND

3 HAVE AUTHORIZED THE UNDERSIGNED TO AFFIX THEIR ELETRONIC

4 SIGNATURES.

5 DATED: March 3, 2023 LYNBERG & WATKINS

A Professional Corporation

6

7

By: /s/ Anita K. Clarke

8 SHANNON L. GUSTAFSON

ANITA K. CLARKE

9 Attorneys for Defendant, COUNTY OF

SAN BERNARDINO

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

18

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.