Opinion

Brown v. State

  • 689 S.W.2d 219
  • 1985 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1221
Court
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Filed
Jan 30, 1985
Status
Published
On the bench
Teague, Miller
Cited by
3 cases
Authority
More cited than 54.3%

stating it was “an established scientific fact that eyewitness identification testimony may be unreliable”

How later courts described this case

  • stating it was “an established scientific fact that eyewitness identification testimony may be unreliable”

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

Appellant's motion for rehearing on petition for discretionary review denied.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.