holding that no contract for sale of real estate existed where material terms, including the legal description of the property, were omitted
How later courts described this case
- holding that no contract for sale of real estate existed where material terms, including the legal description of the property, were omitted
- holding that "a party is precluded from claiming attorney’s fees under a contract which has been found to have never existed”
- holding that a party is precluded from claiming attorneys’ fees under a contract which the court found never existed
- financing terms in real estate transaction were essential terms of the contract for which there was no agreement, and thus, no assent and no contract was formed
Written by the judges who cited it.
The opinion
I dissent for the same reasons expressed in my dissent in Gibson v. Courtois, 539 So.2d 459 , 461 (Fla. 1989) (Barkett, J., dissenting).