applying Illinois law and holding summary judgment was proper where the warning was plain, clear and accurate
How later courts described this case
- applying Illinois law and holding summary judgment was proper where the warning was plain, clear and accurate
- Dkt. 28 at App. 29
- addressing adequacy of the warning language
- “Therefore, the adequacy or inadequacy of the warning to inform a physician must, except in the more obvious situations, be proved by expert testimony.”
Written by the judges who cited it.
The opinion
I respectfully dissent and would approve the opinion of the Fourth District Court of Appeal.