Opinion

Ex Parte Shoemaker

  • 644 So. 2d 958
  • 1993 WL 496008
Court
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama
Filed
Dec 3, 1993
Status
Published
Author
Robertson
On the bench
Robertson, Thigpen
Cited by
11 cases
Authority
More cited than 15.2%

Reversed by Ex Parte Anderson, 644 So. 2d 961 (1994)

The opinion

Loyd L. Anderson filed a petition pursuant to Rule 27, A.R.Civ.P., in the Circuit Court of Shelby County. Following a hearing on the petition and the respondent's motion in opposition to the petition, the trial court ordered the parties named in the petition to comply with certain discovery requests.

A writ of prohibition was sought from this court. After calling for an answer, the majority of this court issued the writ.

Prohibition is proper to prevent a usurpation or abuse of power where a trial judge or court undertakes to act in a manner in which the judge or the court has no jurisdiction. Ex parte Strickland , 401 So.2d 33 (Ala. 1981). I cannot find that the trial judge is usurping or abusing his power in this proceeding which is clearly within his jurisdiction and which is allowed by Rule 27, A.R.Civ.P. See also, § 36-12-40 , Ala. Code 1975. *Page 961

The writ of prohibition should be denied, therefore, I respectfully dissent.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.